Меня и так все знают. y7.hk
Пишу о технологиях, бизнесе, путешествиях, искусстве, дизайне. Занимаюсь в свободное время.
Рекламы нет, совсем.
✉️ @yakushevhk если нужен
Created
30 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 91 days, net +4,659. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,599–22,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 08:50
9,699
-206
2 Nov 2026, 07:48
9,905
-120
1 Nov 2026, 09:57
10,025
-82
31 Oct 2026, 11:49
10,107
-92
30 Oct 2026, 11:55
10,199
-128
29 Oct 2026, 11:19
10,327
-107
28 Oct 2026, 09:06
10,434
-94
27 Oct 2026, 08:50
10,528
-129
26 Oct 2026, 06:36
10,657
-115
25 Oct 2026, 10:06
10,772
-75
24 Oct 2026, 13:28
10,847
-151
23 Oct 2026, 10:28
10,998
-96
22 Oct 2026, 12:27
11,094
-185
21 Oct 2026, 08:09
11,279
-306
20 Oct 2026, 04:47
11,585
+518
19 Oct 2026, 03:35
11,067
-146
18 Oct 2026, 00:01
11,213
+5,880
14 Oct 2026, 15:48
5,333
+402
11 Oct 2026, 01:58
4,931
-21
4 Oct 2026, 16:40
4,952
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 9,699 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,110
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
37 (16 May 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
16,869
Reactions total
509
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 22:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
264
Videos
32
Links
79
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,451 reactions across 37 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
267
18.4%
🥰
243
16.7%
👍
193
13.3%
🎉
160
11.0%
😍
116
7.99%
🤩
109
7.51%
❤🔥
100
6.89%
💯
90
6.20%
😁
27
1.86%
👏
26
1.79%
⚡
24
1.65%
🐳
19
1.31%
🤔
13
0.896%
🤯
7
0.482%
✍
6
0.414%
😱
6
0.414%
🍾
5
0.345%
🍓
4
0.276%
👻
4
0.276%
🌚
3
0.207%
17 further kinds
29
2.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,451 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
324
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 37 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
212
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yakushev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 May 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (37.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В Telegram для macOS встроили ИИ, и это не просто чат-бот 🙃
Сразу оговорюсь: пока это эксперимент, который сейчас тестирую в закрытой сборке. Выкатят ли такое на все платформы — покажет реакция комьюнити
По сути это что-то между Hermes и Grok Bot, потому что посмотрел я внутрянку, очень уж похоже. Плюс создание виртуальных машин — довольно удобно
— Плавающий Utya: Ассистент висит на экране поверх окон и умеет рабо…
Ограбление века на $6,3 миллиарда: как северные корейцы развели инженеров Binance на тестовом задании ❔
Сегодня Binance официально выкатила отчет о том, как у них на прошлой неделе увели рекордные $6,3 миллиарда.
Главную криптобиржу планеты вскрыли с помощью LinkedIn, фейкового собеседования и левого Homebrew из контекстной рекламы.
Хроника этого цирка выглядит так:
— Собеседование мечты: Северокорейские хакеры н…
Как найти работу в 2026-м, пока остальные бомбят резюме в черную дыру 😈
Собрал тут на коленке сервис. Для друзей спозиционировал его просто: как инструмент, чтобы наконец найти нормальную работу (а сейчас это спорт номер один — даже те, у кого всё стабильно, одной ногой поглядывают по сторонам).
Для меня же это кое-что помасштабнее — топливо для создания огромной нетворкинг-машины.
И вот к какому выводу я пришел, …
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как взломать всё что угодно с помощью нейросетей 💻
Если вы ждали готовую пошаговую инструкцию, как поломать чужой сайт в три клика — сразу скажу: её здесь не будет. Никаких хакерских мануалов и вредоносных скриптов я не выкладываю.
Понимание методов современных атак нужно в первую очередь для того, чтобы вовремя увидеть бреши в собственной инфраструктуре и грамотно выстроить защиту. Все упомянутые техники рассматри…
Эпоха цифровых зубочисток: почему софт больше не должен жить вечно 😵💫
Представьте ситуацию: вам нужно свести две кривые таблицы с данными, наглядно сравнить характеристики пяти ноутбуков или собрать интерактивный дашборд под один конкретный звонок с инвестором.
Раньше сценарий был мучительным: вы либо полдня искали готовый сервис (и бесились, что там нет нужной кнопки), либо садились писать скрипт на вечер, либо с…
Как обойти предел сцепления шин, если у тебя под боком есть завод SpaceX❤️
Девять лет публика ждала новый Tesla Roadster. 15 октября 2026 года в Техасе машину наконец выкатили на трек. Без пиротехники, без огня и керосина: аппарат сделал в воздухе кикфлип над фурой, прокатился по рампе колесами к небу и снял разгон до 100 км/ч за 0,81 секунды.
Любой суперкар за миллионы долларов в итоге упирается в одну и ту же ску…
С юбилеем меня (какое страшное слово), теперь влубе 30-ти 😎
Если честно, то из-за ковида и всего того, что творится в мире — ощущаю себя на 23
И может быть это и хорошо. Только к этому возрасту мозг начал работать на каких-то бешенных оборотах, на максимум, по многим показателям это прям пик. Мне кажется, что этим надо воспользоваться
В остальном могу сказать, что время летит очень быстро, и если вы многое отклады…
Мой сетап для работы с агентами ⚡
Мне часто пишут в личку с вопросами про harness: что я использую и как всё устроено на практике.
Удивился, что многие до сих пор знают только Codex и вообще не представляют, как сейчас выглядит нормальная разработка с агентами. Делюсь своим сетапом, на котором сижу каждый день.
Главная проблема в разработке сегодня — это не скорость печати кода, а когнитивная нагрузка. Когда ты о…
Закат индийской фабрики кода 🇮🇳
Двадцать пять лет мировая экономика держалась на предельно простой и выгодной сделке. Западный банк, страховщик или телеком звонил в Бангалор и говорил: «Нам нужно еще пятьсот программистов на поддержку легаси». Через месяц на проект выкатывали толпу дешевых джунов, а клиенту выставляли пухлый счет за отработанные часы.
Модель называлась Time & Materials (T&M), в народе — бодишоп. Че…
Токены, жадность и правила парето 🤔
Последнее время моим роутером моделей пользовалось довольно много людей — миллион запросов, 80 миллиардов токенов и 100 тысяч долларов в эквиваленте API
85% созданных ключей — были бесплатные для людей из раздач, помощи и прочее (для использования Fair use). Но в основном 20-25% от этой бесплатной массы — использовали тысячи запросов суточно, иногда десятки тысяч на человека, и з…
SEO + GEO автоматизация
Работает очень быстро (вывод в топы) и хорошо по нужным гео. В связке с любым Harness + китайскими сервисами 😔 Автоматически подбор конкурентов, добавление беклинков и прочего, эксперимент получился довольно удачный, запускаю тогда на сотню доменов, несколько в день на автомате
Очень эффективно это работает именно с нейронками на поиск, потому что алгоритм внутри заставляет их петлять внутри…
😍13🎉11🥰9👍7❤🔥3👌3💯3🤩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @yakushev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Якушев Герман” (@yakushev), 9,699 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yakushev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.