Channel
@yan_shevv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
163subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002422778202 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yan_shevv |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yan_shevv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 163 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 166 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 162 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 163 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 163 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 32 | 51.6% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 22.6% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Запустили с учеником трафик 5 дней назад, за это время пришло уже больше 50 заявок! 🔥 - составили смыслы для привлечения людей - вместе продумали воронку - вместе ее разработали - нашли подрядчиков и запустили трафик Кто хотел бы себе также? @yanshevv
❤🔥2❤1
Posted without readable text
❤🔥3👍1🔥1
🚀 Открываю одно место на личное сопровождение по выстраиванию системы привлечения клиентов Через мои руки прошло более 30 млн ₽ рекламного бюджета. За это время мы с командой поработали более чем с 300 проектами. Для многих из них мы выстраивали систему привлечения клиентов, а с некоторыми сотрудничали годами. Последние полгода я практически перестал брать проекты в долгосрочную работу. В основном работаю в формат…
❤🔥5❤3🤣2
Развернутый отзыв о личной работе со мной от психолога Андрея Запольского 🔥 «Тот результат, который мы уже получили, он для меня очень ценен. Я разобрался в своей программе, понял, как вообще нужно психологию продавать. Сейчас работаем над запуском, уверен, что у нас все получится!» Вот если что контакт Андрея: @ZapolskyAndrey #отзывы
❤2❤🔥1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤1❤🔥1
Почему ты понимаешь, что делать, но всё равно ничего не делаешь? 😵💫 Я это видел десятки раз у своих учеников. Да и что греха таить, у себя тоже. Загорелся идеей, прописал план, определил ключевые действия… и всё. Конец. Вместо реальных действий переключаешься на имитацию бурной деятельности: докрутить сайт, изучить курс, посмотреть видео на YouTube А реальных действий меняющих баланс на твоем кошельке: ноль Зна…
❤🔥2🔥2
Вот за что я люблю Threads. Только вчера выложил инфу о том, что собираю марафон денежных действий и сегодня уже 10+ заявок Если оффер хороший, люди сразу реагируют 🔥
❤5❤🔥1
Хочу провести Марафон Денежных Действий. Будем 2 недели делать только денежные действия с максимальным фокусом на доход Внутри будет: • моя поддержка • короткие уроки • а также соревновательная система между участниками для максимального результата 🏆 Кто хотел бы присоединится? Напишите «ДА» в личку: @yanshevv 🔥
🔥4❤🔥2👍1
А это небольшой видео-отчёт о завершении группы в сообществе Х10! 2 месяца работы позади 🔥 Ребята капитальные красавчики, каждый из них продвинулся к своим целям! А я как наставник дал все, чтобы это движение было более легким и интересным 🚀
❤🔥1🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥2👍1
Всем спасибо за ответы! Мне светлый тоже больше нравится 😻
❤🔥2
Делаем сайт, какой вариант лучше?)
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @yan_shevv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YAN | Рост без суеты ❤️🔥” (@yan_shevv), 163 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yan_shevv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.