Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 阳阳伊甸园

Channel

阳阳伊甸园

@yangyang9901

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

429subscribers

+352 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003753659860
TypeChannel
Username@yangyang9901
Created19 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yangyang9901

Growth

7742925320 August 2026 — 77 subscribers20 August 2026 — 77 subscribers28 August 2026 — 306 subscribers6 September 2026 — 429 subscribers20 August 20266 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +352. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 09:14429+123
28 Aug 2026, 01:39306+229
20 Aug 2026, 13:3477no change
20 Aug 2026, 13:1577first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 19 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.5%
avg views ÷ 429 subscribers
Avg views / post
182
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held10 (19 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total1,094
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC69 viewsread 20 August 2026

现在有空了哥哥们,服务好与不好只有来过才知道呀,不要老是问我类似的问题哦!😘想体验深喉喉射的可以试试😘

19 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC196 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

哥哥们有时候信息回复不及时肯定是在忙,忙完都会回信息的,不要一直发一直问些无聊的问题,课表价格都在置顶,仔细看下再约课哦!最后祝大家七夕快乐!

19 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC255 viewsread 20 August 2026

新人刚来开课,会用最好的态度对待每一位哥哥,课表内容全部真实,希望哥哥们给个机会来体验一下😘

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @yangyang9901. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“阳阳伊甸园” (@yangyang9901), 429 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yangyang9901.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.