Channel
@yangyangdxyt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
406subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004292598473 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yangyangdxyt |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 26 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yangyangdxyt |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 406 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 410 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 407 | +18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 389 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 386 | -19 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 405 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 406 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 406 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀 野寻上海互推抽奖活动第三期已圆满结束 😀 😀 恭喜所有获奖的小伙伴，奖金已全部发放，获奖名单和领奖截图都已公开，感谢大家的支持！❤️ 😀 第四期8月7日晚22：00开奖 快快参与起来吧！ 😀 报名人数越多，奖金池越高！ 😀 不看邀请人数 😀 报名即可参与抽奖 😀 最高可得 2️⃣3️⃣3️⃣3️⃣元现金红包！ 活动方案 : https://t.me/chasesh_xlb/988 上海交流 : https://t.me/chasesh_jlq 上海报名 : 野寻·星野 @chase_yx 双向联系 @chase_yx_bot
😀 野寻上海SB撒币互推活动强势来意~ 😀 报名参与人数越多，总奖金池越高，不看邀请人数，报名参与即可，奖金多少纯看运气，最高可得 2️⃣3️⃣3️⃣3️⃣ 现金 活动方案 : https://t.me/chasesh_xlb/988 上海交流 : https://t.me/chasesh_jlq 上海报名 : 野寻·星野 @chase_yx 双向联系 @chase_yx_bot
休息两天
抽奖黄浦 【佳佳@yangyangzpt】半价卷（编号L178505154651）已成功开奖： 创建人：蕉哥 上海 (新)[5671550577] 已参与人数：84 中奖名单如下： *[64683911**]（奖品为7折优惠卷） n*[79643303**]（奖品为半价卷） 皇帝皇*[84487099**]（奖品为6折优惠卷）
佳佳的小鱼塘 pinned «中奖的哥哥们可以预约时间了保存记录找我兑换优惠»
中奖的哥哥们可以预约时间了保存记录找我兑换优惠
🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号：H178516098802 🎰 上海佳佳的打折券 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 更多抽奖活动详见活动公告群 💁 参与情况：20达标 / 22报名 🎅 联系领奖：野寻·星野 1. 风吹 蛋蛋凉 奖品：佳佳的6折券 2. Diane Scho... 奖品：佳佳的6折券 3. y y y 奖品：佳佳的7折券 4. 咪咕trois 奖品：佳佳的7折券 5. 明明 奖品：佳佳的7折券 6. james john 奖品：现金红包10.8 祝大家心想事成好运连连！
佳佳的小鱼塘 pinned a photo
✨ 命运揭晓时刻 ✨ 黄浦【佳佳 @yangyangzpt】老师福利 开奖了 抽奖人数：40，抽奖号数：77 1. Lucky樂 中得：五折通用优惠券 2. NeOs【祝福6次】 中得：六折通用优惠券 3. 风吹蛋蛋凉【祝福20次】 中得：七折通用优惠券 抽奖说明： 刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、撤回内容等，一律视为无效发言，不计入统计！ 再次重申：灌水无意义发言都不兑奖！请用心交流。 活动最终解释权归上海修车协会管理团队所有。 中奖的联系 老师 约时间 工兵优惠出击必须写报告 24小时内预约时间，三天内出击，过时自动作废 炸号需找管理验证，无法验证，奖品放回奖池重新抽奖 中奖需本人出击不得转让 中将联系：@yangyangzpt 🔍 杜绝黑幕，点击查看本次开奖全程验证
佳佳的小鱼塘 pinned a photo
✨ 命运揭晓时刻 ✨ 萝莉岛（@shlldq） 萝莉岛 浦东 佳佳 老师优惠券抽奖 开奖了 抽奖人数：27，抽奖号数：27 1. WoCaO 中得：1p五折优惠劵 2. DaoDao 中得：1p六折优惠劵 3. 小H是个摄影师 中得：1p七折优惠劵 4. donghuawang 中得：1p八折优惠劵 抽奖说明： 1️⃣本次抽奖由 佳佳老师赞助 @yangyangzpt 2️⃣开奖后七天有效，请再七天内使用 3️⃣遇到问题请找唯一客服 @shlldbot 🔍 杜绝黑幕，点击查看本次开奖全程验证
佳佳的小鱼塘 pinned «晚课优惠10p20pp空可约»
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @yangyangdxyt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yangyangdxyt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小七的鱼塘” (@yangyangdxyt), 406 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yangyangdxyt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.