Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 37 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,717–2,732 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 03:59
2,730
+1
12 Sept 2026, 19:15
2,729
+6
8 Sept 2026, 19:35
2,723
-1
3 Sept 2026, 12:56
2,724
-1
31 Aug 2026, 12:13
2,725
+2
28 Aug 2026, 07:55
2,723
+1
24 Aug 2026, 21:59
2,722
+1
21 Aug 2026, 07:13
2,721
-2
17 Aug 2026, 23:23
2,723
-2
14 Aug 2026, 17:35
2,725
+4
10 Aug 2026, 23:02
2,721
+2
10 Aug 2026, 12:30
2,719
no change
10 Aug 2026, 12:16
2,719
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
309 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
266
86.1%
👍
21
6.80%
🥰
16
5.18%
😢
3
0.971%
🐳
2
0.647%
👎
1
0.324%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yaroslavarussian. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, только вы можете мне помочь!
Я хочу, чтобы видео на ютубе и материалы были ещё полезнее и интереснее.
И поэтому мне очень важно познакомиться с вами ближе:
узнать ваш опыт, трудности и цели.
👉 Поэтому я сделала специальную анкету, чтобы узнать вас лучше:
https://forms.gle/AUjmGaKQ5ipSquYC9
Эта анкета займёт всего 10-15 минут,
но ваши ответы напрямую повлияют на мою работу!
Так мы вместе создадим классны…
Как говорил один знаменитый робот
I'LL BE BACK! 🦾
И мы тоже бэк :)
В эту субботу, 8 августа, в 11:30 утра по Буэнос-Айресу (UTC-3)
будем читать новости о восстании машин!
🔗 Ссылка на трансляцию: https://youtube.com/live/idqxrT_e7vc
⏰ Проверить время: https://everytimezone.com/s/11e2213d
Как всегда, будем говорить по-русски!
Будет непросто, потому что это настоящий русский язык для носителей, а не адаптированные те…
Эх, у меня были готовы новости, чтобы читать завтра!
Я заболела... ОПЯТЬ!.. 🤦♀️ (рукалицо, как говорится)
Поэтому завтра (в пятницу), нового видео не будет :(
Но если вы хотите поддержать меня, когда я болею,
и послушать что-то на русском языке,
вы можете посмотреть это недавнее видео:
https://youtu.be/IQk5rU8_aCk
Оно как раз о болезнях! (и его многие из вас не видели!)
На связи 💜
Сегодня читаем актуальные новости!
Атаки на Wildberries
- Почему титул "российский Амазон" – это слишком слабо для Вайлдберриз?
- Какой экономический эффект атак?
- Как это повлияет на россиян?
Расскажите, вы видели эту новость в ваших новостях? Если да, то что пишут об этом в вашей стране?
До встречи на ютубе 💙
Сегодняшняя картина с ягодами:
"Клубника и белый кувшин" Ильи Машкова (1943г)
—
Все PDF и бонусные ви…
Вы победили!
Завтра в 14:00 по Буэнос-Айресу будем читать об атаках на Wildberries!
https://youtube.com/live/Fh-t-m_fTFU
ПС. Но через неделю точно будем читать что-нибудь менее депрессивное!
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⚽️ Новое видео!
Читаем новости о футболе и готовимся к финалу чемпионата мира по футболу!
Что будем делать:
- вспомним основную спортивную лексику
- обсудим FIFA 2026
- и ненадолго вернёмся в 2018-й и вспомним FIFA 2018 в России :) (я ностальгирую и почти плачу)
🎁 К видео есть бесплатный PDF со словарём и практикой.
До встречи на ютубе!
Картина: Александр Дайнека "Вратарь" 1934
ПС. Мы сегодня пойдём смотреть фин…
Можете поверить, что 8 лет назад Чемпионат мира по футболу ФИФА был в России?
Кажется, что это была совсем другая жизнь.
Давайте немного поностальгируем вместе!
В эту пятницу, 17 июля, в 14:00 по Буэнос-Айресу (UTC-3) будем читать и обсуждать новости о Чемпионатах мира по футболу 2018 и 2026.
🔗 Ссылка на трансляцию: https://youtube.com/live/XV3xRadm4Yw
⏰ Проверить время: https://everytimezone.com/s/0b6bf281
Как вс…
Привет! А вот и запись нашего прямого эфира :)
Как обычно, с субтитрами и рабочим листом
https://yaroslavarussian.kit.com/fuel
Уже на моём ютуб канале 💙
ПС. Какую новость будем читать в следующую пятницу? У меня есть идеи, а у вас?
❤20🐳2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yaroslavarussian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рашн фо форинерс. Как дела у Ярославы?” (@yaroslavarussian), 2,730 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yaroslavarussian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.