Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Яся Лисицкая о персиках, яблоках и Психеях

Channel

Яся Лисицкая о персиках, яблоках и Психеях

@yasia_lis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

105subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003395873961
TypeChannel
Username@yasia_lis
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yasia_lis

Growth

8610595.56 August 2026 — 86 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86 subscribers14 August 2026 — 87 subscribers28 August 2026 — 88 subscribers7 September 2026 — 95 subscribers14 September 2026 — 105 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 15:21105+10
7 Sept 2026, 14:1795+7
28 Aug 2026, 20:5288+1
14 Aug 2026, 23:0487+1
9 Aug 2026, 16:1786no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:4886first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52494535419358424212138.2%
custom 52469617135798561051527.3%
custom 52489602649418975071018.2%
custom 5247183209338276705916.4%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC21 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

. ✋ Мне привезли конверты из Дон Кихота Спешу успокоить, ни один Дон Кихот ради этого не пострадал. Дон Кихот — это сеть универсальных магазинов в Японии. Там можно купить все: от сладостей до чемодана. Проект задумывался как вызов устаревшей системе японского рынка. Поэтому её основатель и дал детищу имя, пожалуй, самого известного литературного персонажа-бунтаря — противника повседневности, серости, у

custom 52494535419358424215custom 52469617135798561052custom 52471832093382767052custom 52489602649418975072

6 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC23 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

. 🧚‍♀️ Какой единственный вопрос вы бы задали мертвецу? Недавно листала «Джентльмена из Перу» и наткнулась на цитату, которая меня долго не отпускала. Мысль совсем не нова, уже сто раз проговорена, но Асиман сумел задеть меня за живое. Мне кажется, услышать это стоит хотя бы 🐬 единожды каждому. «Почти все мы проживаем всю жизнь, дожидаясь единственного правильного стечения обстоятельств. Ибо жизнь — эт

custom 52494535419358424215custom 52489602649418975074custom 52469617135798561051

4 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC24 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

. 📄 Познаю искусство отзывов, или как покупать книги по 30 рублей На прошлой неделе впервые попробовала оставить отзыв на книгу на сайте «Буквоеда». За каждый начисляют до 50 баллов (читай «рублей»). Из основных правил: минимум 300 знаков — пара предложений, без спойлеров, оскорблений ✨ и негодаваний. Можно еще добавить фото: для них вообще никаких ограничений. На четыре отзыва у меня ушло минут 10-15.

custom 52469617135798561057custom 52489602649418975073custom 52494535419358424212custom 52471832093382767051

1 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC37 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

. 📚Знаю, что вам понравилось, поэтому держите еще больше фотографий из библиотеки Вакаямы Городок, к слову, недалеко от побережья. Так что легкий запах бриза чувствуется везде. Пробирается он и в стены библиотеки. И я просто не могу отделаться 🐬 от мысли, что среди этих полок гуляет книжный дух Кафки Тамуры. Ну и еще одно признание: вам не кажется, что Кафка Мураками чем-то похож на Синдзи из «Евангели

custom 52494535419358424214custom 52469617135798561053custom 52471832093382767052custom 52489602649418975071

30 Jul 2026, 05:22 UTC43 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🩷 Отрываю эти книги от сердца Но с большой любовью 🌟 Кажется, сколько бы лет не прошло, я не смогу отойти от них — слишком много важного о себе и мире они мне поведали. #подборки@yasia_lis

custom 52494535419358424215custom 52471832093382767054custom 52469617135798561052

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @yasia_lis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Яся Лисицкая о персиках, яблоках и Психеях” (@yasia_lis), 105 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yasia_lis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.