Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EasyG | Yassen Ayad

Channel

EasyG | Yassen Ayad

@yassenayad

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,665subscribers

+97 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001883325846
TypeChannel
Username@yassenayad
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yassenayad

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

14,56814,67114,619.57 August 2026 — 14,568 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,569 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,573 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,579 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,587 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,592 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,594 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,582 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,592 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,599 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,603 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,616 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,620 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,623 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,621 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,625 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,632 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,643 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,638 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,632 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,637 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,643 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,646 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,643 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,645 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,658 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,668 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,669 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,671 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,665 subscribers14,6657 August 202617 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 41 days, net +97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,553–14,686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:0114,665-6
13 Sept 2026, 21:1814,671+2
12 Sept 2026, 02:2014,669+1
9 Sept 2026, 15:5614,668+10
6 Sept 2026, 07:2214,658+13
3 Sept 2026, 22:1914,645+2
2 Sept 2026, 11:3714,643-3
1 Sept 2026, 13:1214,646+3
31 Aug 2026, 11:2814,643+6
30 Aug 2026, 09:0614,637+5
29 Aug 2026, 08:4714,632-6
28 Aug 2026, 08:1114,638-5
27 Aug 2026, 08:1214,643+11
26 Aug 2026, 11:2214,632+7
25 Aug 2026, 14:2214,625+4
24 Aug 2026, 17:1114,621-2
23 Aug 2026, 01:4614,623+3
21 Aug 2026, 13:5614,620+4
20 Aug 2026, 10:4314,616+13
19 Aug 2026, 08:1114,603first reading

Engagement

112 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.48%
avg views ÷ 14,665 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.512%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 112 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held112 (2 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total29,200
Reactions total128
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 09s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

713 reactions across 79 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
67594.7%
🥰385.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 713 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:48 UTC237 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprintPhoto

هاي ديفدسون طبعة 24 يذكر 48 ساعة

2 Sept 2026, 17:48 UTC273 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprintPhoto

هاي ديفدسون 25 يذكر 24 ساعة

2 Sept 2026, 17:48 UTC279 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprint

تمشي عليمن؟ بالامتحان ؟ اكيد نمشي على القديم لأن اغلب الاسئلة الي اجت بلوزاري هي على الكايدلاين القديم الطبعة القديمة … زين اكو احد مسؤول من الوزارة مصرح عليمن نمشي؟ لا 🙅 زين اني مسؤول عن هذا الكلام ؟ لا مجرد تصريح وتوقع منطقي وتبقى أنت وقناعتك شنو تجاوب انت مسؤول، اني اوضحلك قدر المستطاع واساعدك واوضحلك شنو موجود وشنو ديصير وانت الك القرار تسالني دكتور انت عليمن تمشي بلطوارىء الحقيقيه؟ اكلك ولا مريض شفته بحياتي كد

1

2 Sept 2026, 17:17 UTC419 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprintFile

File, posted without a caption

2 Sept 2026, 17:17 UTC438 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprint

هاي مو محاضرة عادية! هاي عبارة عن كنز الAtrial fibrillation ، مستحيل راح تشوف هيچ ترتيب وكل الأسئلة الي براسك راح أجاوبها 🔥 https://youtu.be/erw60JnDkcY?si=WlsP8XYoOds45Lfk

2 Sept 2026, 17:17 UTC430 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprint

هذا ال Algorithm عبقري بدرجة كبيرة ، شلون تعرف؟ اقره جميع المصادر والكتب والمحاضرات وبعدها قارن طريقة العرض بهذني الصفحتين بس ( وراح تعرف ليش هو كنز)

2 Sept 2026, 15:58 UTC621 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprintPhoto

تفصيله بسيطة جداً جداً سويتها مثلت اثر الفراشة بشكل رهيب وصارت وحده من اعظم مميزات الكورس

1

2 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC833 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprintPhoto

417 مشترك في كورس الكارديولجي خلال شهر واحد فقط… ماعندي تفسير آخر غير ان فقط توفيق الله كان حاضراً وبقوه ، ولا يسعني الوقت او الكلمات ان اشكر هذا العدد الكبير من الاطباء لثقتهم الكبيرة ❤️❤️ الحمدلله حمداً طيباً مباركاً

20🥰2

1 Sept 2026, 16:14 UTC≈1,360 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprintVideo

الشاصي كله لو فقط الچاملغ؟

3

31 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC≈1,530 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprintPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

9

31 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,610 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprint

سنين من كنت طالب واني اسمع ان اصعب موضوع بلنفرولجي هو انواع الGN وبلفعل هو صعب لكن على الطريقة الي انشرح بيه حالياً بلكورس راح تغلط بيه وما تجاوب بالامتحان بشرط واحد بس ( انك متعمد بنفسك تختار الجواب الخطأ وانت تريد تقلل درجتك ممكن علمود الحسد 😅) بتوفيق الله صار تقريبا ١٠ ايام اشرح بهلموضوع وصار من اسهل المواضيع الي حتشوفوها ومستحيل تنساهن ولا حتى تكدر تنساهن

🥰144

31 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC≈1,720 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @infectiousblueprintPhoto

سلايد ذهبي

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @yassenayad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr.Haider Abdulridha Baqer
@Drhaidermedicalcourses · 29,832
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐌𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐞 ♥️؛؛
@ECG2023 · 27,383
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
فروع طبية
@iraqmedical2020 · 43,478
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
MED ACE
@MED_ACE · 25,655
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
The Injectable Drug
@Drug_injectable · 22,237
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
Scientific pharmacists
@Scientificpharmacists · 25,167
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
بحوث/سمنارات/تقارير
@Seminar2001 · 27,359
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Medicine heroes || ابطال الطب
@medicine_heroes · 35,161
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
دليل اطباء كركوك
@kirkukDr · 33,986
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 10 September 2026
Physiology
@physiology_yaqob · 33,582
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Human Anatomy Atlas 2023
@human_anatomy_atlas_2019 · 25,348
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
Medicine Way - القناه الاحتياطية | MW
@Medicine_Way4 · 23,239
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Dr Muhammed Deyhaa
@zaxuuu · 23,699
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
Pediatrics | MW
@Pediatric_Data · 22,659
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 September 2026
مصادر كلية الطب
@MedrollB · 22,141
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
Read more
@Reading12 · 26,019
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Pulse - النبض
@MPTC_1 · 34,893
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
طلاب المجموعة الطبية ღ طب ღ اسنان ღ صيدلة ღ تقنية ღ تمريض
@IraqMedicalStudents · 97,003
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
Dermatology in Iraq
@saadm1999 · 25,968
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
اصداء جامعة تكريت
@asdaaatu · 33,853
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Ninja Nerd Videos & Notes 2026
@NinjaNerd770 · 38,849
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
جامعة الكوفة/University of Kufa
@University_of_Kufa · 28,564
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
Elhusseiny USMLE Program
@elhusseinyusmle · 44,110
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 August 2026
رسلي المالكي - Rusly Al-Maliki
@ruslyalmaliki · 100,542
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EasyG | Yassen Ayad” (@yassenayad), 14,665 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yassenayad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.