Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 63 days, net -1,938. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,516–24,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 01:19
21,807
-37
4 Nov 2026, 22:29
21,844
-29
4 Nov 2026, 00:37
21,873
-27
2 Nov 2026, 22:26
21,900
-26
2 Nov 2026, 00:50
21,926
-33
1 Nov 2026, 03:00
21,959
-20
31 Oct 2026, 04:50
21,979
-32
30 Oct 2026, 04:48
22,011
-46
29 Oct 2026, 02:50
22,057
-30
28 Oct 2026, 03:39
22,087
-8
27 Oct 2026, 03:41
22,095
-29
26 Oct 2026, 02:31
22,124
-32
24 Oct 2026, 23:55
22,156
-29
24 Oct 2026, 02:37
22,185
-32
23 Oct 2026, 00:00
22,217
-20
22 Oct 2026, 00:30
22,237
-50
20 Oct 2026, 18:36
22,287
-49
19 Oct 2026, 16:28
22,336
-28
18 Oct 2026, 19:51
22,364
-36
17 Oct 2026, 22:56
22,400
first reading
Engagement
156 posts held, back to 19 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.31%
avg views ÷ 21,807 subscribers
Avg views / post
722
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 156 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 76 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
156 (19 September 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
54,843
Reactions total
476
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 02:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
214
Videos
27
Links
140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 11s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,161 reactions across 142 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,036
89.2%
👍
65
5.60%
🔥
31
2.67%
🙏
12
1.03%
👨💻
8
0.689%
🏆
7
0.603%
💯
2
0.172%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 156 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 77 posts held from the last 30 days (5.19%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨 فردا ساعت ۱۲ ظهر، جلسه نهایی! 🔥
رفقا یک هفته درباره سبد ۴ برابری و فرصتهای بازار صحبت کردیم.
حالا وقت جمعبندی و تصمیمگیریه!
⛔️ فردا آخرین فرصت همراهی با برنامه سبد ۴ برابری رو توضیح میدیم.
🖐️ اگه میخوای تو این جلسه حضور داشته باشی، همین امشب فرم رو تکمیل کن.
📍فرم ثبتنام👇🏻
https://survey.porsline.ir/s/0iKNe7Co
@yazdanjafarzadeh
🔥 اگه امروز بخوای برای یک سال آینده سرمایهگذاری کنی، کدوم بازار رو انتخاب میکنی؟
طلا؟ دلار؟ بورس؟ یا یه فرصت متفاوت؟!
🚨 با شرایط فعلی اقتصاد ایران، انتخاب اشتباه میتونه هزینه زیادی داشته باشه.
🖐️ فردا ساعت ۱۲، تو جلسه آنلاین درباره فرصتهای پیش رو و استراتژی سبد ۴ برابری صحبت میکنیم.
⛔️ آخرین فرصت همراهی با این برنامه
📍فرم دریافت لینک جلسه👇🏻
https://survey.porsline.ir/s/0iKNe7Co
@yazadanjzd
🚨 دارندگان طلا، فردا رو از دست ندید!
طلا این روزها حوالی ۲۶ میلیون تومان نوسان میکنه…
اما سؤال مهم اینه:
🔥 این نوسانات شروع یه تغییر بزرگتره یا فقط یه اصلاح موقتی؟
فردا ساعت ۱۲ ظهر، تو جلسه آنلاین درباره آینده طلا، دلار و فرصتهای سرمایهگذاری صحبت میکنیم.
⛔️ این آخرین جلسه جمعبندی سبد ۴ برابریه.
📍برای دریافت لینک ورود، فرم رو تکمیل کنید👇🏻
https://survey.porsline.ir/s/0iKNe7Co
@yazadanjzd
🚨 بعد از یک هفته، رسیدیم به مهمترین جلسه! 🔥
رفقا تو این یک هفته کنار هم بودیم، سه قسمت سبد سرمایهگذاری ۴ برابری رو بررسی کردیم و درباره فرصتهای بازار صحبت کردیم.
اما هنوز یه جلسه مهم باقی مونده… 🖐️
🔥 فردا جمعه ساعت ۱۲ ظهر، تو یه جلسه آنلاین کنار هم هستیم!
قراره تمام مباحث رو جمعبندی کنیم، درباره مسیر پیش رو صحبت کنیم و آخرین فرصت همراهی با برنامه سبد ۴ برابری رو توضیح بدیم.
⛔️ اگه این یک هفته جلسات رو دنبال …
🚨 قسمت پایانی رو از دست دادی؟!
قسمت سوم سبد ۴ برابری منتشر شده و الان میتونید تماشاش کنید! 🔥
🖐️ اگه دو قسمت قبلی رو دیدید، حتماً این قسمت رو هم دنبال کنید تا مجموعه براتون کامل بشه.
⛔️ آخرین نوبت انتشار مجموعه سهقسمتیه.
📍لینک قسمت پایانی👇🏻
https://www.aparat.com/v/ipw7fzq
@yazadanjzd
🚨 قسمت سوم و پایانی سبد ۴ برابری منتشر شددد! 🔥🔥
رفقا رسیدیم به آخرین قسمت مجموعه!
🔥 تو این جلسه مباحث سرمایهگذاری رو جمعبندی میکنیم و درباره مسیر پیش رو صحبت میکنیم.
⛔️ این آخرین نوبت انتشاره؛ فرصت تماشای قسمت پایانی رو از دست ندید.
📍تماشای قسمت سوم👇🏻
https://www.aparat.com/v/ipw7fzq
@yazadanjzd
🚨 ۱۵ دقیقه تا انتشار قسمت سوم! 🔥🔥
رفقا آماده باشید!
⛔️ آخرین قسمت از آخرین نوبت انتشار سبد ۴ برابری تا چند دقیقه دیگه در دسترس قرار میگیره.
🖐️ امشب قراره مجموعه رو تکمیل کنیم.
⏰ ساعت ۸، لینک همینجا منتشر میشه.
@yazadanjzd
🚨 فقط یک ساعت تا قسمت آخر! 🔥
امشب پرونده مجموعه سهقسمتی سبد ۴ برابری رو میبندیم!
🖐️ اگه دو قسمت قبلی رو دنبال کردید، وقتشه جمعبندی نهایی رو هم ببینید.
⛔️ این آخرین نوبت انتشار این مجموعهست.
⏰ رأس ساعت ۸ لینک قسمت سوم منتشر میشه.
@yazadanjzd
📈 دومین روز مثبت بورس تهران!
شاخص کل بورس امروز حدود ۴۸ هزار واحد رشد کرد و به محدوده ۷ میلیون و ۸۷۳ هزار واحد رسید.
🔥 بعد از جهش سنگین دیروز، بازار امروز هم با رشد شاخص کل به کارش پایان داد.
@yazadanjzd
🔥 یه نکته که خیلیها تو سرمایهگذاری نادیده میگیرن!
فقط پیدا کردن یه بازار در حال رشد کافی نیست!
باید بدونیم چه زمانی وارد بشیم، چه ریسکهایی وجود داره و چطور سرمایهمون رو مدیریت کنیم.
🚨 تصمیم بدون برنامه میتونه حتی تو بازار صعودی هم پرهزینه باشه.
امشب قسمت سوم و پایانی سبد ۴ برابری رو منتشر میکنیم.
⏰ ساعت ۸ شب
@yazadanjzd
🚢 گره مهم مذاکرات همچنان تنگه هرمزه!
ایران میگه بازگشایی تنگه هرمز باید همراه با پایان محاصره دریایی آمریکا و تحقق شروط تهران باشه.
🕊️ قطر همچنان در حال میانجیگریه، اما هنوز توافق نهایی به دست نیومده.
⛔️ این موضوع مستقیماً روی صادرات نفت و انتظارات بازارهای جهانی اثر میذاره.
@yazadanjzd
🖐️ یه نکته برای جاموندگان!
اگه هنوز قسمت دوم سبد ۴ برابری رو ندیدید، قبل از ساعت ۸ امشب حتماً براش وقت بذارید.
🔥 چون امشب قراره مجموعه سهقسمتی رو به پایان برسونیم و مباحث دو جلسه قبل رو جمعبندی کنیم.
📍تماشای قسمت دوم👇🏻
https://www.aparat.com/v/nid19cl
⏰ قسمت سوم و پایانی: امشب ساعت ۸
@yazadanjzd
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @yazadanjzd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@yazadanjzd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@yazdanjafarzadeh named in 8 posts, 28 September 2026 – 4 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
رادیمگ | آموزش تولید محتوا | خلاقیت @radimag_ir · 14,915#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کانال تلگرامی فرشته ایران نژاد @fereshte_irannezhadd · 24,921 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 September 2026
Behnood_maleki @behnoodmalekii · 19,364 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 September 2026
علی سیاه کلاه | Ali Siahkolah @alisiahkolah · 29,570 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
پیمان یعقوبی 💎 آموزش تولید محتوا @instapeyman · 25,198 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 September 2026
رضا گلشنی | آقای فروشinvite @reza_golshani_education · 20,700 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 September 2026
هوش مصنوعی | Ehsaneshooon @EhsaneshooonTG · 31,991 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال رسمی یزدان جعفرزاده” (@yazadanjzd), 21,807 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yazadanjzd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.