Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for یـ ڪصخݪ🕸

Channel

یـ ڪصخݪ🕸

@yee_Koskhool

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

122subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001230372262
TypeChannel
Username@yee_Koskhool
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live20 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 20 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/yee_Koskhool

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1221261245 September 2026 — 126 subscribers5 September 2026 — 126 subscribers16 September 2026 — 125 subscribers13 October 2026 — 122 subscribers5 September 202613 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 37 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 01:56122-3
16 Sept 2026, 23:58125-1
5 Sept 2026, 15:23126no change
5 Sept 2026, 14:47126first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,303 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍76858.9%
❤18113.9%
👌16012.3%
😍705.37%
🤣413.15%
🤔312.38%
🔥302.30%
❤‍🔥191.46%
⚡20.153%
😐10.077%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,303 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2024 to 7 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jan 2025, 12:15 UTC798 views37 reactionsread 5 September 2026

https://t.me/sigmatonbot/app?startapp=ref_qgk0z7 ایدارپ سیگما که جدید امده و به نسبت تعداد تون کوینی که تو ولتت از اول ریختی تا الان توکن سیگما میده بهت🔥فراموش نشه باید ولتت وصل کنی!

❤20👍17

30 Oct 2024, 06:16 UTC≈1,380 views78 reactionsread 5 September 2026

ایدراپ جدید پاوس که خیلی معتبره حتما استارت کنید🔥

👍28❤‍🔥19👌13😍12🤔4⚡2

30 Oct 2024, 06:15 UTC≈1,380 views64 reactionsread 5 September 2026

https://t.me/PAWSOG_bot/PAWS?startapp=LK4Lkdak

👍29🔥15😍12👌8

3 Oct 2024, 09:08 UTC≈1,570 views78 reactionsread 5 September 2026

t.me/notpixel/app?startapp=f1599928819 نات پیکسل ربات جدید نات کوینه که قراره یک ماه دیگه لیست بشه و پول خوبی قراره بده استارت کن تا پشمون نشدی🔥

👍31❤19🔥15👌12😐1

30 Sept 2024, 14:55 UTC≈1,530 views79 reactionsread 5 September 2026

t.me/ratsgame_bot/app?startapp=m3ndooo2&startApp=m3ndooo2 ربات موش امده هنوز تو استارت نکردی😐😳

❤36👍29👌14

8 Sept 2024, 08:33 UTC≈1,760 views68 reactionsread 5 September 2026

ایدراپ Bits تازه امده و قراره بزودی لیست شه جویین بده از دستش ندی🔥

👍36👌32

8 Sept 2024, 08:32 UTC≈1,610 views53 reactionsread 5 September 2026

https://t.me/BitsTonboxBot/BitsAirdrops?startapp=WMZXWzvqr7sJuCDn6L2Emm

👍38😍15

27 Aug 2024, 10:19 UTC≈1,590 views70 reactionsread 5 September 2026

داگزو اگه از دست دادی؟ وقتشه کَتز را از دست ندی جویین شو قراره لیست شه😍

🤣41👍29

20 Aug 2024, 19:01 UTC≈1,650 views64 reactionsread 5 September 2026

http://t.me/catsgang_bot/join?startapp=YIrhLdqA0wdso5trs73ES

👍43❤21

19 Aug 2024, 09:41 UTC≈1,540 views66 reactionsread 5 September 2026

ربات جدیدی که تازه امده و معتبره🔥

👍42👌24

19 Aug 2024, 09:41 UTC≈1,500 views55 reactionsread 5 September 2026

https://t.me/LovelyLegends_bot/start?startapp=kentId1599928819

👍31👌24

18 Aug 2024, 13:14 UTC≈1,370 views58 reactionsread 5 September 2026

میجر استار کنید قراره مثل داگز لیست شه🔥

👍42❤16

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yee_Koskhool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

4K MemePack
@MemePack4K · 34,828
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
Joker
@NoteJoker · 20,524
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 September 2026
Proxy MTProto
@iTopProxy · 31,667
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“یـ ڪصخݪ🕸” (@yee_Koskhool), 122 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yee_Koskhool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.