Channel
@yfanghs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
153subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001846390490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yfanghs |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yfanghs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 153 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 155 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:05 | 159 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 160 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 163 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 163 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢越哥说电影 📢酒店偷窥.谜歼.直播-威... 📢新盛真人赌场—华纳国际赌... 📢万利代理 万利官网 万利... 📢六合彩 置顶很准 交流群 📢SM 字母 捆绑 📢皇冠官网 皇冠私网 皇冠... 📢剧集解说|一口气看完系列... 📢🇹🇼台灣困困賴667... 📢代推🫥 📢M2档案 📢频道帖子浏览量｜群组上粉 📢日理万鸡|中文吃瓜🔞 📢利博官网｜万利官网｜皇冠... 📢Telegram知识库 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢 Ton 中文索引 📢💎 【8.cc】U投领导者 千万域名 百亿大盘 充值笔笔加赠3% 📢🅾️免费试玩✅大客必备✅注册送158🅾️ 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 📢专业Telegram账号交易平台🔥热门社交媒体账号交易 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
娱乐评论大赏 故意化很难看的妆看哥哥们会有什么反应
#林志玲 这谁顶得住啊
#牌友 #四人斗地主 #听风娱乐
❤1
#刘宇宁 #宋祖儿 520同框撒糖！这是真撒糖！#折腰
一本正经的那是少女，半推半就的才是少妇#娱乐 #dj #男女好色 @抖音小助手 @DOU+上热门
远方和诗 pinned a photo
🎉 X-Panel | 海外社交媒体账号出售 💋 购买账号➡️上粉包装➡️推广引流 一战搞定 ❤️🔥 Telegram协议号全网最全，纯一手号，质量硬，带量来谈！！ 👉Twitter、Facebook、Ins、苹果id、海外邮箱....... 欢迎带量咨询~ 🌐官方网站 🔰账号交易 👩🏻💻联系客服
江西热点不断
大学生主打一个淡定
面对极端天气，大家一定要注意安全，尽量避免热烈天气出行
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yfanghs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yfanghs named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“远方和诗” (@yfanghs), 153 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yfanghs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.