Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for yngbless

Channel

yngbless

@yngbless

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,584subscribers

+1,724 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001438496557
TypeChannel
Username@yngbless
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yngbless

Growth

8,86010,5849,7227 August 2026 — 8,860 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,937 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,169 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,396 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,664 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,016 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,116 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,246 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,331 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,382 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,438 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,481 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,510 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,517 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,530 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,560 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,578 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,584 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
18 measurements spanning 26 days, net +1,724. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,601–10,843 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 16:1610,584+6
1 Sept 2026, 15:0710,578+18
31 Aug 2026, 13:4710,560+30
30 Aug 2026, 12:4510,530+13
29 Aug 2026, 14:3410,517+7
28 Aug 2026, 15:5910,510+29
27 Aug 2026, 19:2910,481+43
26 Aug 2026, 15:5310,438+56
25 Aug 2026, 17:0210,382+51
24 Aug 2026, 20:1810,331+85
23 Aug 2026, 03:3610,246+130
21 Aug 2026, 16:4610,116+100
20 Aug 2026, 13:2410,016+352
17 Aug 2026, 14:189,664+268
14 Aug 2026, 05:469,396+227
11 Aug 2026, 00:349,169+232
7 Aug 2026, 20:558,937+77
7 Aug 2026, 10:338,860first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.9%
avg views ÷ 10,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,650
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held82 (19 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total297,680
Reactions total13,104
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15,046 reactions across 82 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54655114594442352888,12554.0%
custom 52919146494810075654,97933.1%
custom 57874181931275421051,73811.6%
custom 54318494986430185002041.36%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,046 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
556
across the posts below
Posts paid on
61
of 82 we hold a reading for · 74%
Most on one post
143
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yngbless. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 82 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC770 views69 reactionsread 29 August 2026

ходют слухи что это трек на русском….

custom 546551145944423528869

29 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC≈1,010 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026

ещо один музыкальный там рифмы https://on.soundcloud.com/XW4ASwOPDDQ9aBXHMW

custom 546551145944423528839

29 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,450 views132 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5465511459444235288132

29 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,190 views254 reactionsread 29 August 2026

каенжел который пишет треки на английском но его не слушают английские😂 также чертов тюлень )) RESPECT )

custom 5465511459444235288254

28 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC≈2,450 views202 reactions17 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

yngbless - GANG песня про любофф… СЛУШАТЬ / СКАЧАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ / СКАЧАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ / СКАЧАТЬ й*бнутая обложка by cybershiz prod. by me

custom 5465511459444235288202

28 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC≈2,230 views142 reactions11 Starsread 29 August 2026

привет

custom 5465511459444235288142

28 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC≈2,370 views133 reactions3 Starsread 29 August 2026

около 60 минут

custom 5465511459444235288133

28 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈2,740 views242 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

нах*й напали на меня… я люблю деньги - они меня…

custom 5465511459444235288242

28 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈2,800 views193 reactions3 Starsread 29 August 2026

00:01

custom 5465511459444235288193

28 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC≈3,240 views264 reactions4 Starsread 29 August 2026

00:00

custom 5465511459444235288264

27 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈3,550 views261 reactions12 Starsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5465511459444235288261

27 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈3,640 views296 reactions4 Starsread 29 August 2026

да блять, янгблес просто высокомерный певец

custom 5465511459444235288296

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @yngbless. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 81,656 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“yngbless” (@yngbless), 10,584 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yngbless.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.