Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,207–11,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:21
11,325
+9
15 Sept 2026, 23:37
11,316
+24
14 Sept 2026, 09:20
11,292
+9
12 Sept 2026, 15:39
11,283
+4
10 Sept 2026, 12:01
11,279
-22
7 Sept 2026, 06:19
11,301
+3
4 Sept 2026, 13:58
11,298
+13
3 Sept 2026, 00:56
11,285
+1
2 Sept 2026, 02:12
11,284
+17
1 Sept 2026, 05:05
11,267
+4
31 Aug 2026, 04:24
11,263
-6
30 Aug 2026, 07:13
11,269
-5
29 Aug 2026, 06:04
11,274
-4
28 Aug 2026, 06:12
11,278
-4
26 Aug 2026, 00:54
11,282
+6
25 Aug 2026, 00:36
11,276
+8
23 Aug 2026, 09:43
11,268
-3
21 Aug 2026, 18:08
11,271
+2
19 Aug 2026, 11:13
11,269
+4
17 Aug 2026, 14:26
11,265
first reading
Engagement
102 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.52%
avg views ÷ 11,325 subscribers
Avg views / post
285
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 102 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
102 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
14,832
Reactions total
554
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
27s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,016 reactions across 95 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
577
56.8%
🔥
150
14.8%
👍
75
7.38%
💔
44
4.33%
👌
37
3.64%
🙏
34
3.35%
🌚
28
2.76%
😍
22
2.17%
🕊
11
1.08%
⚡
10
0.984%
❤🔥
7
0.689%
👏
7
0.689%
custom 6046363987606506933
4
0.394%
🤔
3
0.295%
🤯
3
0.295%
🥰
2
0.197%
🍾
1
0.098%
💯
1
0.098%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❤️ Друзья, спасибо всем, кто был сегодня с нами на вебинаре!
Сегодня мы говорили о языке абстракции, её месте в современном искусстве, о том, что делает работу сильной, как формируется её ценность и почему художнику важно понимать профессиональный контекст.
🔥 Если вы хотите продолжить это исследование, приглашаем вас в «Лабораторию абстрактного искусства». Уже в понедельник, 7 сентября, стартует поток двухмесячной …
⏰ Мы уже в прямом эфире!
Прямо сейчас разбираем историю абстрактного искусства: от первых шагов абстракции до художников, которые изменили представление об искусстве.
Говорим:
• что такое абстрактное искусство и почему оно стало переломным моментом в истории искусства;
• кто считается первым абстракционистом и почему вокруг этого вопроса до сих пор идут споры;
• как менялось понимание абстрактного искусства и почем…
🔥 Мы уже в эфире!
Разбираем, что делает абстракцию сильной, как формируется ценность произведения и что помогает художнику выйти из мастерской в профессиональное поле: к выставкам, галереям, биеннале и коллекциям.
‼️ Если вы ещё не подключились, присоединяйтесь прямо сейчас. Записи не будет.
🔗 Ссылка на эфир: https://start.bizon365.ru/room/104580/HZlOn2guzx
⏰ Друзья, уже через час встречаемся в прямом эфире на бесплатном вебинаре «Абстрактное искусство: путь художника. Как создавать сильное абстрактное искусство и заявить о себе в арт-среде».
Сегодня будем говорить о том, что делает абстрактную работу сильной, как формируется её ценность и что помогает художнику двигаться дальше: от собственной практики к выставкам, галереям, коллекционерам и профессиональной арт-среде…
⚡️ До нашего вебинара остаются считанные часы.
Сегодня в 19:00 (мск) встречаемся на бесплатном вебинаре «Абстрактное искусство: путь художника. Как создавать сильное абстрактное искусство и заявить о себе в арт-среде».
Сегодня мы вместе разберёмся, почему одни абстрактные работы становятся частью профессиональной арт-среды, а другие так и остаются красивыми интерьерными объектами.
Если вы работаете с абстракцией и…
⚡️ The Art Newspaper Russia представил топ-50 молодых художников России #новости
The Art Newspaper Russia опубликовал рейтинг «Топ-50 молодых художников России». В центре внимания авторы от 18 до 35 лет, которые активно проявляют себя на современной российской арт-сцене.
Редакция сформировала лонг-лист из 70 имен, после чего художников оценили независимые эксперты: кураторы, галеристы, коллекционеры, критики, предс…
⚡️Как формируется путь к дорогим и узнаваемым работам в абстракции.
Высокая стоимость и узнаваемость произведения не являются следствием только техники. Работы могут быть визуально похожи, но одна остаётся предметом интерьера, а другая считывается как искусство и растёт в цене.
Ситуации могут быть разные:
• Вы годами пишете абстракцию, её покупают под интерьер, но цена стоит на месте, а галереи вежливо молчат.
• Вы…
↗️Что на самом деле можно понять об абстракции, просто посмотрев на неё.
Сегодня мы с вами попробовали посмотреть на абстрактные работы без привычных подсказок: имён художников, истории создания и дополнительного контекста. Где-то ответ казался очевидным, где-то приходилось скорее доверять первому впечатлению.
Но насколько оно оказалось точным?
1. Сколько стоила работа?
Перед вами была работа Джексона Поллока «N…
Как вы думаете, какая ориентация работы соответствует замыслу автора?
Перед вами одна и та же абстрактная работа в двух вариантах.
Какая из них соответствует авторскому замыслу?
❤️ Вариант № 1
🔥 Вариант № 2
Ответ и историю этой работы раскроем позже.
Как, по-вашему, была создана эта абстракция?
❤️ только с помощью кистей
🔥 с помощью большого ракеля
⚡️ с помощью малярных валиков
👌 краску разливали прямо по холсту
Выбирайте свой вариант реакцией под постом 👇 А какой инструмент на самом деле использовал художник, покажем сегодня.
Как думаете, сколько времени художник работал над этой абстракцией?
Посмотрите на работу и попробуйте определить это только по изображению.
❤️ несколько дней
🔥 несколько недель
⚡️ несколько месяцев
👌 около двух лет
Выбирайте свой вариант реакцией под постом 👇 А сколько времени художник работал над этой абстракцией на самом деле, расскажем сегодня.
Какая из этих работ создана профессиональным художником?
Перед вами две абстрактные работы. Одна принадлежит известному художнику, вторая создана нейросетью.
Как думаете, где работа художника?
❤️ Работа № 1
🔥 Работа № 2
Выбирайте свой вариант реакцией под постом 👇 А удалось ли отличить работу художника от нейросети, узнаем сегодня.
❤26🔥19🤔1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @your_art_muse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@your_art_muse edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Современное искусство @artornet · 28,480 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
[WORK IN ART] Работа в сфере искусства @workinart · 71,088 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
я поведу тебя в музей @vmuzey · 35,813 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
ART FLASH @AFmagazine · 25,708 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 September 2026
Shakko: об искусстве @shakko_kitsune · 46,866 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Your art muse” (@your_art_muse), 11,325 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/your_art_muse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.