Блог Марии Хилтунен – куратора, арт-менеджера.
Помогаю строить карьеру в арт-среде.
По вопросам рекламы: [email protected]
Обучение: @OnStudy_online_bot
Created
11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 90 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,203–11,367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 11:51
11,308
-7
3 Nov 2026, 13:30
11,315
+5
2 Nov 2026, 13:46
11,310
-2
1 Nov 2026, 11:06
11,312
-9
31 Oct 2026, 11:04
11,321
-3
30 Oct 2026, 11:31
11,324
-15
28 Oct 2026, 08:16
11,339
+7
27 Oct 2026, 08:05
11,332
+15
26 Oct 2026, 06:40
11,317
-4
25 Oct 2026, 05:56
11,321
-8
24 Oct 2026, 07:06
11,329
-3
23 Oct 2026, 09:31
11,332
-1
22 Oct 2026, 09:07
11,333
-5
19 Oct 2026, 22:39
11,338
+3
18 Oct 2026, 21:06
11,335
-5
17 Oct 2026, 21:19
11,340
-4
17 Oct 2026, 00:15
11,344
-4
15 Oct 2026, 23:27
11,348
+3
15 Oct 2026, 01:47
11,345
+1
13 Oct 2026, 20:08
11,344
first reading
Engagement
118 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.21%
avg views ÷ 11,308 subscribers
Avg views / post
363
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 118 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
118 (3 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
5,812
Reactions total
210
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,900
Videos
≈1,110
Links
≈3,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
41s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,226 reactions across 111 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
705
57.5%
🔥
164
13.4%
👍
115
9.38%
🙏
47
3.83%
💔
44
3.59%
👌
37
3.02%
🌚
33
2.69%
😍
24
1.96%
👏
11
0.897%
🕊
11
0.897%
⚡
10
0.816%
❤🔥
7
0.571%
💯
5
0.408%
custom 6046363987606506933
4
0.326%
🤔
3
0.245%
🤯
3
0.245%
🥰
2
0.163%
🍾
1
0.082%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 116 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#opencall
📍 «Большая вещь», галерея Оли Шмуклер
Дедлайн подачи заявок: 30 ноября 2026 года
Галерея современного искусства Оли Шмуклер объявила опен-колл для художников, создающих крупноформатные произведения для выставочных проектов, общественных и коммерческих пространств.
К участию приглашаются авторы, работающие с живописью и графикой от 150 см, крупной фотографией, скульптурой и объектами от 80–100 см, инсталля…
#полезное
Друзья, продолжаем собирать для вас полезные ресурсы. Мы с вами уже говорили о медиа, которые стоит читать, об изданиях с отчётами об арт-рынке и о российских арт-резиденциях, за которыми стоит следить.
Теперь смотрим на международные резиденции. Труднее всего здесь найти программу, которая подходит именно вам, поэтому я предлагаю начинать с каталогов. Мы с командой разложили их по регионам и начинаем с А…
✨ Современное искусство или нет?
#насмотренность ⤵️
June Crespo (Хуне Креспо)
«Parentescos (IX)» («Родство IX»), 2026
Frieze London, Лондон, 2026
Баскская художница Хуне Креспо создала скульптуру из литого алюминия и текстиля. Металлическая форма напоминает смятый свёрток с глубокими складками, между которыми видна красная ткань.
Отправной точкой серии стала дорожная сумка бабушки художницы. Креспо заинтересовало,…
Сегодня в нашей рубрике #чтопочитать рассказываем о новой книге Марины Абрамович, одной из самых известных художниц современного искусства, которая уже более пятидесяти лет исследует возможности человеческого тела через перформанс.
📚 042/100
Marina Abramović
«Long Life, Short Stories»
(2026)
(«Долгая жизнь, короткие истории»)
К своему 80-летию Марина Абрамович подготовила необычную книгу воспоминаний «Long Life, Sh…
#opencall
📍 Арт-резиденция «Выкса» — 2027, Нижегородская область
Дедлайн подачи заявок: 29 ноября 2026 года
Продолжительность резиденции: 6–8 недель
Арт-резиденция «Выкса» объявила международный набор на юбилейный сезон 2027 года. Тема программы — «Металл как отправная точка», исследование материала, металлургического наследия и современных технологий через искусство.
К участию приглашаются художники и исследовате…
✨ Современное искусство или нет?
#насмотренность ⤵️
Rosa Barba (Роза Барба)
«Thick Harmonies» («Плотные гармонии»), 2026
Art Basel, Базель, 2026
За стеклом стальной коробки размером 100 × 100 сантиметров моторы непрерывно прокручивают петлю 35-миллиметровой кинопленки. Двигаясь, пленка складывается в линии и изгибы, поэтому композиция внутри постоянно меняется.
Роза Барба превращает кинопленку из носителя изображе…
#opencall
📍 Выставочная программа Linda de La — 2027, Москва
Арт-центр Linda de La объявил открытый приём кураторских проектов для выставочной программы 2027 года.
Главная тема программы — исследование человека: его идентичности, памяти, отношений, уязвимости, личных переживаний и внутренних конфликтов.
К участию приглашаются кураторы с персональными, групповыми и междисциплинарными выставочными проектами. Рассмат…
🔥 Последние 6 часов, чтобы присоединиться к новому потоку программы «Профессия арт-менеджер художника в современном искусстве» со скидкой 24%!
Друзья, на нашем интенсиве мы подробно говорили о том, как построить карьеру в современном искусстве с нуля, какие возможности открывает профессия арт-менеджера и с какими трудностями сталкиваются новички.
Как найти первого художника? Где получить практический опыт? Как нача…
💫 На Sotheby’s выставят картины Пикассо, которые не показывали публике более 50 лет
#новости
18 ноября в Нью-Йорке на торги Sotheby’s выставят четыре полотна Пабло Пикассо, созданные в 1964–1972 годах. Их общая предварительная стоимость составляет $30–42 млн.
Главным лотом станет монументальная картина Femme nue et homme au fanion (1969), оценённая в $15–20 млн.
Особый интерес представляют две работы, Femme nue et…
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @your_art_muse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@your_art_muse edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Саша Робинсон Творчество Продвижение @sasharobinson · 19,018 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 October 2026
Янковская @myankovskaya · 19,258 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
Открытый призыв/Open call Россия @opencallRus · 21,728 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
Современное искусство @artornet · 28,354 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Где выставка @gdeart · 22,048 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Artnagrada @artnagrada · 19,933 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
[WORK IN ART] Работа в сфере искусства @workinart · 72,093 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
я поведу тебя в музей @vmuzey · 35,902 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
OP-POP-ART @oppopart · 30,557 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
ART FLASH @AFmagazine · 25,528 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 September 2026
КУЛЬТУРНЫЕ ЛЮДИ @culturepeople · 20,724 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
The Art Newspaper Russia @TANR_official · 22,332 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
ArtFragment @ArtFragment · 18,763 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 5 October 2026
Shakko: об искусстве @shakko_kitsune · 47,020 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Your art muse” (@your_art_muse), 11,308 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/your_art_muse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.