🦦 Своей внешностью и повадками 𝗯𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 нередко ставил зоологов в 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻. Его долго считали близким родственником 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗻, потом заметили 𝗯𝗲𝗮𝗿-𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 и 𝗰𝗮𝘁-𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀, из-за чего его и сейчас называют 𝗕𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗮𝘁. 📘 Vocabulary 𝗯𝗶𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 — бинтуронг 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 — замешательство 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗻 — енот 𝗯𝗲𝗮𝗿-𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 — медвежий / похожий на медведя 𝗰𝗮𝘁-𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 — кошачьи черты 𝗕𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗮𝘁 — «кошачий медведь» https://t.me/your_pra

Channel
Практика английского
@your_practice
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,829subscribers
-158 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001351188746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @your_practice |
| Description | Совершенствуй свои навыки с нами! По вопросам рекламы: @tanya_plll Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/your_practice |
| Created | 11 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/your_practice |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 17,829 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 17,830 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 17,836 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 17,842 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 17,851 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 17,854 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 17,864 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 17,873 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 17,878 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 17,887 | -9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 17,896 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 17,904 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 17,910 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 17,919 | -17 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 17,936 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 17,942 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 17,954 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 17,961 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 17,968 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 17,971 | first reading |
Engagement
236 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.564%
- avg views ÷ 17,829 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 101
- 236 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 236
- of 236 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 236 (5 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,743 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 00:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,550
- Videos
- ≈103
- Links
- ≈1,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7m 33s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
♠️CardBox - это карточные игры не выходя из Telegram! Внутри тебя ждет: 🔵Покер 🔵Уно 🔵Дурак Пробуй тут ⬇️
5 слов на тему "столовые приборы" 🍴 https://t.me/your_practice Новости из капитолия - Москоутрендс. Подписывайся!
❗️ Правильный ответ: 🤩 - had taken ✔️ Это смешанный тип условных предложений (Third / Second). Первая часть относится к нереальному событию в прошлом (Past Perfect), а вторая часть •she wouldn't be feeling... - это длительный вариант (Present Conditional Continuous) в отрицании, так как речь идет о текущем состоянии здоровья. Он используется вместо обычного Present Conditional Simple (would + глагол без to), когда …
https://t.me/your_practice Новости из капитолия - Москоутрендс. Подписывайся!
🇬🇧📚DO vs MAKE — за 15 секунд! #английский Запоминайте просто: · DO — это когда ты делаешь работу, упражнения, домашку, посуду (рутина, процесс). · MAKE — когда ты создаёшь что-то новое: еду, ошибки, планы, шум, друзей (да, make friends!). ➡️Примеры из жизни: · I need to do my homework, then make dinner. · She did her best to make him happy. 🚫 Ошибка: I made my homework— неправильно! Только did. https://t.me/your_…
BRITISH ENGLISH *сленг ▪️to work hard = to graft = to slog ▪️to drink quickly = to neck = to down ▪️to eat = to scran = to grub •He’s been grafting in the garden all weekend. •I’ve been slogging away at this report for five hours. •He necked his pint and ordered another one. •The crowd started cheering, so she downed her drink.▫️Толпа начала скандировать, и она осушила свой бокал до дна. •I'm starving, let's scran …
https://t.me/your_practice Новости из капитолия - Москоутрендс. Подписывайся!
NERIQUETTE [ˈnetɪkɪt] (нетикит) Сетевой этикет 🇬🇧 Any comment in breach of the Rules of Netiquette will be deleted. 🇷🇺 Комментарии, нарушающие Правила сетевого этикета будут удалены. https://t.me/your_practice Новости из капитолия - Москоутрендс. Подписывайся!
Difficult isn't your only option Вот две самые частые замены этого слова, которые постоянно встречаются в живом английском. ✅ Challenging — сложный, требующий усилий. It was a challenging project. → Это был непростой проект. ✅ Tough — трудный, тяжёлый, непростой. The exam was really tough. → Экзамен был очень сложным. Ставь «👍», если хочешь еще https://t.me/your_practice Новости из капитолия - Москоутрендс.…
Volunteering (vɒlənˈtɪərɪŋ) – волонтёрство Похожие слова: 1. Service (ˈsɜːrvɪs) – служба, обслуживание 2. Contribution (ˌkɒntrɪˈbjuːʃən) – вклад 3. Community (kəˈmjuːnɪti) – сообщество 4. Support (səˈpɔːrt) – поддержка Пример употребления в предложении: Volunteering at the local shelter has been a rewarding experience for many people. Волонтёрство в местном приюте стало полезным опытом для многих людей. https://t.…
🚩 Где заканчивается curious и начинается nosy? Оба слова связаны с любопытством, но отношение к ним совершенно разное. ⚡️ Curious — это здоровое, естественное любопытство. Так говорят о человеке, который хочет узнавать новое, задаёт вопросы и интересуется миром вокруг себя. I've always been curious about astronomy. → Меня всегда интересовала астрономия. ⚡️ А вот nosy («нóузи») почти всегда звучит как критика. Это…
Showing the 12 most recent of 236 posts we hold for @your_practice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@your_practice edited 26 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 29 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,575,386 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@SkippNetBot · 137,5467 postsМосква деловая
@mosdeal · 313,0384 postsLumix VPN
@Lumix_vpn_bot · 60,4973 postsFairJack
@FairJackBot · 52,8432 postsFlyVPN • Доступно всё
@flyvpn · 37,1632 postsJetTon Official
@jetton · 992 postsAtlanta VPN bot
@AtlantaVPN_bot · 333,7541 postУролог
@urolog · 1041 postGhost VPN
@Vpn_Ghost_Robot · 476,3711 postСейв ВПН | Save VPN
@vpnsave · 242,8761 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@your_practice named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 20 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ieltstoeflcefrr · 65,391
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
@EnglishByEar · 42,097
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@mathrus3 · 54,593
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Практика английского” (@your_practice), 17,829 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/your_practice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.