Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chad Gamble

Channel

Chad Gamble

@yourchadgamble

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,749subscribers

+548 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003999470871
TypeChannel
Username@yourchadgamble
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yourchadgamble

Growth

1,2011,7491,4757 August 2026 — 1,201 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,201 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,232 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,273 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,276 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,327 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,340 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,385 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,553 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,558 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,749 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net +548. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,119–1,831 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 03:001,749+191
3 Sept 2026, 00:251,558+5
30 Aug 2026, 11:451,553+168
27 Aug 2026, 19:331,385+45
24 Aug 2026, 17:271,340+13
20 Aug 2026, 17:081,327+51
17 Aug 2026, 17:471,276+3
14 Aug 2026, 07:251,273+41
10 Aug 2026, 17:551,232+31
7 Aug 2026, 23:561,201no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:181,201first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9549.5%
👍4221.9%
👏168.33%
🔥147.29%
🤔115.73%
🥰73.65%
😎31.56%
😁21.04%
😡21.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC378 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

看到了一些不错的人正在积累

8👏3🤔2

7 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC494 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

无用币几乎在每一条链上都表现不错 如果unipcs买了rb上这个,会如何?

👍8👏1

5 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,440 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Rb上的无用币,$WORTHLESS 团队貌似跟bonk官方有一些关联 如果接下来有一些利好发酵,400K位置不算高 0x018493d3439a538ed7985eb14084414db58c9576

9👏5🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC658 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

买了一点BSC的这个 $FEG Monkey一样的模式,据说是 BSC feg 的老团队,多0黄金底池 0x735bb6b4001fcbd42a18c8111a6c230245407777

8

4 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC643 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$WOOF just tapped 5.4M,now 5M 13X 🔥🔥🔥

6🔥2👏1

4 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC655 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Shibinhood Buy! 💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚 💰 15.83 ETH ($29,450.38) 🪙 6,778,339,938 WOOF 🏷️ Price: $0.000005426 🔼 Mkt Cap: $5,425,786 🔍 0x370a...12cf ⬆️ Position: New! 🔥 #8 TRENDING Tx | Chart | Web | X | Trending

🔥32

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yourchadgamble. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chad Gamble” (@yourchadgamble), 1,749 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yourchadgamble.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.