Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝖸𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖢𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗇! #🦐

Channel

𝖸𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖢𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗇! #🦐

@yourdelamer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

111subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003091030034
TypeChannel
Username@yourdelamer
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yourdelamer

Growth

1091111109 August 2026 — 109 subscribers10 August 2026 — 109 subscribers17 August 2026 — 110 subscribers1 September 2026 — 111 subscribers9 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109–111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 00:06111+1
17 Aug 2026, 10:48110+1
10 Aug 2026, 08:20109no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:16109first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 5 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5264909093419646936818.2%
😭715.9%
custom 5305245678211985610613.6%
custom 5382090644661496010613.6%
custom 534406545235407281536.82%
💔36.82%
😨36.82%
🤯24.55%
❤‍🔥12.27%
🌚12.27%
🌭12.27%
💯12.27%
😱12.27%
🙈12.27%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yourdelamer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC5 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @yourkaiMPhoto

➖ 🐏🐏🐏 🔤ew 🔤ost 🐏🐏🐏 ➖➖➖➖➖ 🥹🥹@vrtualstarzz➖ 🐏🐏🐏🐏 ➖➖➖ угадайте кто не спит?~ 🥰

4 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026

😀О, я бы ещё поспорил на счёт этого, бестия.🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

4 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026

😀А может быть я представитель латино-американских кровей... Черт знает. Когда-нибудь мне надо будет сделать тест ДНК.🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

4 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026

😀Oh mon Dieu, конечно! Жан ДеЛамер — буквально переводится "Жан из Моря"!🌊 😀... Ну, возможно я ещё частично и цыган. Настолько глубоко в себя я не проникался.🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

4 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026

😀Метафорические и не очень.🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

4 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC34 viewsread 9 August 2026

😀Как бы я тоже хотел вернуться на Родину, мог бы даже лично отвезти. Как раз и с моими парнями бы познакомилась.🌊 😀Но не могу, бесы не пускают...🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

29 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC69 viewsread 9 August 2026

😀Какие тренировки вы обычно проводите? 😀Для себя или кого-то ещё? Сам я, каюсь в последнее время мало занимаюсь чем-то больно активным, но обычной работы на корабле мне вполне хватало для ежедневных физических нагрузок. А простецкие тренировки, в роде зарядок, были неотъемлемой частью дисциплины моряка на палубе! Так что, для своих парней, я спуску не даю! Море — место прекрасное и суровое, которое требует быть силь

21 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC111 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😀... Что-то не так?🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

😭4💔2💯1

21 Jul 2026, 20:07 UTC109 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😀О, это я могу!🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

😨3😭3🤯2🌚1🌭1💔1😱1🙈1

21 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😀Появится новая причина наконец-то спать по ночам, бестия!🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

custom 53440654523540728151

21 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😀Пошли уже какие-то секретные приёмчики.🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

custom 53052456782119856101

21 Jul 2026, 19:39 UTC81 viewsread 9 August 2026

😀А я готовить умею! Могу научить!🌊 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yourdelamer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖸𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖢𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗇! #🦐” (@yourdelamer), 111 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yourdelamer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.