Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Твоё мнение

Channel

Твоё мнение

@youropinion_marchi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

867subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002041830200
TypeChannel
Username@youropinion_marchi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/youropinion_marchi

Topic

Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8538678607 August 2026 — 853 subscribers8 August 2026 — 853 subscribers14 August 2026 — 854 subscribers11 September 2026 — 867 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 35 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 851–869 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 16:41867+13
14 Aug 2026, 23:14854+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:18853no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:24853first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3458.6%
🤯1525.9%
👍610.3%
🫡23.45%
🤔11.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC209 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

засиделись мы тут — пора и честь знать! (ч. 4) прощайте, мрачные коридоры, преступные группировки, антисанитария и тяжелые рабочие дни на душных заводах. прощай, мрачная сторона Коулуна! ❌❌❌✈️✈️✈️ ❌❌✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️ ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️ ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️ ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️ ✈️❌✈️✈️✈️ снесли его в начале 1990х годов, но его развитие закончилось даже раньше — из-за аэропорта Кайтак рядом у жителей не получалось надстраивать жилищ…

❤9👍3🤯3

29 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC235 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

начинаем карабкаться на вершину бетонных джунглей! (ч.3) 📸📸📸📸 📸📸📸📸 📸📸📸📸 📸📸📸📸{ рис. 1 } если до этого мы петляли по мрачным переулкам, то теперь еще и по лестницам попетляем. здесь нет привычных и понятных лестнично-лифтовых узлов, которые сразу поднимают нас наверх. поэтому в череде этих вертикальных блужданий и активного кардио мы периодически попадаем в чьи-то жилища. 📸📸📸📸 📸📸📸📸 📸📸📸📸 📸📸📸📸{ рис. 3 } это по-настоя…

❤11👍2🤯2

29 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC229 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мы усаживаемся на лежак, который так мило разложен на крыше, и начинаем наблюдать за жизнью коулунцев под открытым небом. • дети катаются на велосипедах • тетушки развешивают белье • мужики играют в маджонг эти наблюдения погружают нас в мысли о столь противоречивой жизни местного люда. ❌❌ ❌❌❌❌ ❌🥢🥢 ❌❌❌❌❌ ❌🥢🥢🥢 ❌❌❌❌❌ 🥢🥢🥢🥢 🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢 🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢🥢 размышления планомерно подводят нас к итогу — чем оказался…

❤10🤯3🫡2

28 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC288 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

внимание, уважаемые экскурсанты! (ч.2) ГОНКОНГ <————> КОУЛУН ❌🫳 🫳 по левую руку❌ по правую руку вы наблюдаете пред вами оплот привычную жизнь анархии и самостроя, мегаполиса куда мы и отправимся должен предупредить! v кроме, запаха сырости, откормленных крыс и тараканов вас там встретят все пороки, которые рождает анархичное общество: опиумные …

🤯7❤4👍1🤔1

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @youropinion_marchi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Твоё мнение” (@youropinion_marchi), 867 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youropinion_marchi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.