Если у вас тревожность, панические атаки - пробуйте 👆
💯5🔥4❤1

Channel
@yulia_odushe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
914subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001566678698 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yulia_odushe |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yulia_odushe |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 914 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 912 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 911 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 913 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (23 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 946 |
| Reactions total | 80 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
134 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 64 | 47.8% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 17.9% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 12.7% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 6.72% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 3.73% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.99% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.99% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 2.99% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.746% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.746% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.746% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если у вас тревожность, панические атаки - пробуйте 👆
💯5🔥4❤1
Многие верующие не слышат Бога. Не потому что Он молчит. Нас этому не учат. Нам говорят: «Читай Библию, молись, ходи в церковь». Но о том, что с Богом можно разговаривать как с живым Отцом — молчат. И мы живём с убеждением: «Это было в Библии, но не для меня». А потом удивляемся, почему вера сухая, молитвы — формальные, а Бога мы не чувствуем. Но Бог не изменился. Он всё так же хочет говорить с нами. ❕Он говорил…
❤10
Сейчас тренинг «Как справляться с эмоциями и при этом не согрешать» включен в обучение на христианского консультанта. 2 поток уже скоро. Если не планируете обучаться на христианского консультанта, а тема управления эмоциями актуальна, напишите моему сотруднику 👉 @evgeniy_anin
👍2❤1
Приветствую! 🤗 Мой отзыв о курсе 💖💖💖
👍2🔥1
Мы переехали в новый район, так что прогулки у меня теперь такие 🚣 🤩
🔥5❤4🤩1
Часто под постами я вижу тишину. Никаких реакций. Ни комментариев. Ничего. И я ловлю себя на мысли: «А может, это никому не нужно? Может, я пишу в пустоту?» Но я знаю, что есть те, кому это откликается. Для кого эти слова становятся важными. Как и получилось в аудио выше ☝️ К слову, упомянутый пост 👉 здесь Поэтому у меня к вам просьба. По-человечески. Если вам что-то откликается — дайте мне знать. Поставьте лайк.…
❤13🔥7🤝4🙏2👏1
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍2🔥1
Спасибо ❤️ на днях хотела написать🙈 Прохожу сейчас непростой период: решения по основной работе, наступил какой-то тупик, как двигаться дальше, а также периодически роятся мысли об отсутствии семейных отношений. Но! Я настолько благодарна за все те знания и инструменты, которые получила через твои продукты и личную работу, прям не передать) Вчера получила предложение перейти на должность заведующей отделения, но я …
❤8🔥6
"Я не справляюсь" — честные слова каждой мамы.
«Многие из нас годами переживали ад на земле. Сердце покрывалось шрамами от оскорблений. Мы умножали свои трагедии, негодуя на Бога. Возводили стену злобы на всех, кто задевал нас. Начинали жить самосожалением. А потом — завидовать тем, кто, по нашему мнению, живёт лучше». Пишет Билл Гиллем в своей книге «Больше не жертва». Тема поста «Как распознать мышление жертвы? 6 признаков.» Дальше — ещё жёстче. «Многие лю…
❤9👍1
1. «После всего, что со мной сделали, я никогда не смогу стать полноценной». 2. «Если бы вы росли в такой семье, как я, вы были бы точно такими же». 3. «Если бы то не случилось — жизнь была бы замечательной». 4. «Я имею право. После того, что я пережил, жизнь обязана мне». 5. «Они не были внимательны ко мне — теперь я не буду внимателен к ним». Завтра выйдет пост, в котором будет объяснение какая проблема стоит…
🤔4❤2👍2👀1
Почему одним - всё, а другим - ничего? Я долго его не понимала. Я откровенно раздражалась, когда читала это место Писания: «Ибо кто имеет, тому дано будет и приумножится, а кто не имеет, у того отнимется и то, что имеет» (Мф. 13:12) Как так? У кого нет — отобрать, у кого есть — ещё добавить? Где логика? Где справедливость? Особенно остро этот вопрос стоял, когда я была незамужем. Ждала и не знала, придёт ли тот ч…
🙏7👍5🕊4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @yulia_odushe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Христианский психолог Юлия Шиманова” (@yulia_odushe), 914 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yulia_odushe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.