https://t.me/kdjqjt

Channel
小跳的朋友
@yuuehhj
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
131subscribers
+78 since we began measuring on 16 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004412618901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuuehhj |
| Created | 13 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 16 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuuehhj |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:45 | 131 | +14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 117 | +52 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 08:45 | 65 | +12 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:22 | 53 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 13 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 143.3%
- avg views ÷ 131 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 188
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (13 October 2026 – 16 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,689 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 31s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
开课啦 哥哥们😘
杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://telegram.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】:#超级好评 【优势】长得好看,态度也很好,做爱舒服 【不足】无 【出击时间】:10月14日 【老师花名】:#马小跳 (@gdiiti) 【出击留名】:zhelin 【开课位置】:上城区 【修车水费】:600p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照评价】:(跟照片一样) 【身材评价】:(小小的瘦瘦的) 【胸部评价】:(B罩,软) 【鲍鱼评价】:(很干净,紧致) 【服务评价】:(服务做全,课表上的基本都有) 【态度评价】:(态度很好,聊天很自然) 【环境评价】:(课室干净,有一次性浴巾和漱口水) 【过程描述】: #流程细节:(大于100字) 凑巧看到了小跳老师上榜,一看就有种心动的感觉,于是马上沟通确认地点,到了老师住的地方后简单寒暄了几句去洗澡…
小跳的朋友 pinned a photo
那个号用不了了,但是报告都在😘
杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://t.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】:#超级好评 【优势】小只嫩妹,情绪价值高,黄皮,姿势配合,叫声动听 【不足】 【出击时间】:6月20日 【老师花名】:#马小跳 (@gdiiti) 【出击留名】:janni 【开课位置】:西湖区 【修车水费】:工兵P 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照评价】:人照一致,本人更可爱 【身材评价】:身高155左右,小短腿,纹身手臂,皮肤手感滑嫩(背上长有些小痘痘问题不大) 【胸部评价】:B罩杯,形状挺拔无科技,手感柔软。 【鲍鱼评价】:毛量正常,水多,非常紧,会夹 【服务评价】:服务意识很好很认真,嫩妹三件套,口活意料之外的好 【态度评价】:态度很热情,全程笑脸,喜欢聊天,情绪价值拉满 【环境评价】:课室干净整洁/有漱口水和一次性浴巾 【过程描述】: #流…
杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://t.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】:#超级好评 【优势】态度意识很强,帝王享受,有种大姐姐的温柔体贴感,但本身小萝莉这就很反差;原价也很夯 【不足】🈚 【出击时间】:6月21日 【老师花名】:#马小跳 【出击留名】:忘不了鱼🐟 【开课位置】:西湖钱塘one 【修车水费】:工p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻✔️ ② 69舔逼(我没要) ③ 情绪价值✔️(夯) ④ 毒龙 【人照评价】:(人照一致,带妆上课,耐看型) 【身材评价】:(160小萝莉,黄皮、小面积纹身) 【胸部评价】:(B,小乳头) 【鲍鱼评价】:(小蝴蝶,毛量一般,水量多,紧) 【服务评价】:(服务做全) 【态度评价】:(过程无机车,催、赶,无罚站行为,帝王享受,全程服务,态度很好) 【环境评价】:(课室干净,有漱口水一次性浴巾等) 【过程描述】: #流程细节:(大于100字) …
杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://t.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】: #超级好评 【优势】嫩,情绪价值足,时间很宽松,一级棒 【不足】无无无 【出击时间】:6月23日 【老师花名】:#马小跳 【出击留名】:溜溜 【开课位置】:钱塘one 【修车水费】:600p(原价) 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✓ ② 69舔逼 有但没要 ③ 情绪价值 ✓ ④ 毒龙 没问 【人照评价】:人照9分 【身材评价】:实际感觉比照片瘦一点,小小的很可爱 【胸部评价】:b,嫩嫩的 【鲍鱼评价】:很多水 吊感很棒很紧 【服务评价】:服务到位,做全 【态度评价】:情绪价值拉满,态度很好 【环境评价】:课室干净,进出无门禁,公寓但是是月租的两层公寓,安全 【过程描述】: #流程细节: 周二没上班出去放松一下,就在群里看到新来的老师粥粥,看了第一眼就被他深深吸引,周一就约了老师,但是没…
开课的 哥哥们 在上城😘
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @yuuehhj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小跳的朋友” (@yuuehhj), 131 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuuehhj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.