Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 66 days, net +235. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,796–7,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 12:37
7,067
+31
5 Oct 2026, 17:37
7,036
+51
27 Sept 2026, 22:41
6,985
+63
18 Sept 2026, 16:36
6,922
+14
14 Sept 2026, 04:36
6,908
-2
10 Sept 2026, 22:37
6,910
+12
6 Sept 2026, 06:00
6,898
+18
2 Sept 2026, 03:04
6,880
+1
30 Aug 2026, 07:37
6,879
+18
26 Aug 2026, 23:05
6,861
+2
23 Aug 2026, 17:36
6,859
+17
20 Aug 2026, 09:47
6,842
+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:27
6,841
+6
10 Aug 2026, 21:05
6,835
+4
7 Aug 2026, 21:56
6,831
-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:30
6,832
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:20
6,832
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 33s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,136 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,791
43.3%
❤
1,346
32.5%
👍
895
21.6%
👏
43
1.04%
🥰
22
0.532%
🤩
16
0.387%
😁
9
0.218%
🤔
8
0.193%
🎉
6
0.145%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Укропная Ржано-пшеничная Лепёшка
180 г вода1
100 г закваска пшеничная 100%*(или остатки закваски из холодильника)
100 г ржаная мука
200 г муки пшеничная вс
7 г соль
10 г масло растительное
20 г укроп
20 г вода2(если тесто плотное)
*если у вас нет закваски, то возьмите вместе неё 50 г. воды и 50 г. муки вс.
Закваску размешать в воде. Добавить все оставшиеся ингридиенты и замешать тесто. Вымешивать руками 3-5 минут…
Эмпанадас (Empanadas)
Восемь штук 85 г тесто 65 г начинка
Тесто:
· 400 г Мука пшеничная в/с
· 140 г Масло сливочное (или оливковое)
· 80 г Вода (или вино белое или пиво)
· 50 г Яйцо (1 шт)
· 6-7 г Соль (1 ч.л. без горки)
· Яйцо (смазать перед выпечкой).
В миске смешать муку с солью и разрыхлителем(я не добавлял). Сделать колодец. Влить масло, вино и яйцо. Замесить гладкое, эластичное тесто. Месить 5-7 минут. Оно не …
Начинка для испанских эмпанадас шкварчит.
Сегодня выложу рецепт теста и начинки 😉
Кстати, скажите когда вы обычно заходите в Telegram? В какое время? Когда удобнее получать рецепты?
Зачем запекать лисички? Если лисички запечь 15 минут в духовке, потом заморозить - они не дадут горечи при разморозке и сохранят яркость вкуса. Лучше чем варить или ничего не делать.
Согласны? Пищите ваше мнение 👇🏻
Рецепт Мраморного кекса от @zabavnikov_team 🧁🍫
Выход: 1 форма «кирпич» 20–25 см.
База (белое тесто):
180 г — Масло сливочное 82.5% (комнатной температуры)
180 г — Сахар
150 г — Яйцо
180 г — Мука пшеничная вс
10 г — Разрыхлитель
30 г — Молоко
Ванилин — на кончике ножа
Шоколадная паста (для мрамора):
30 г — Какао-порошок (алкализованный)
15 г — Сахар дополнительный
80 г — Кипяток или горячее молоко (3 ст. л.)
Способ…
ИИ на кухне: что работает, что нет и как внедрить и не облажаться
Кажется, тема искусственного интеллекта сейчас звучит громче, чем открытие нового мишленовского ресторана. Одни уверены, что он заменит половину профессий, другие считают его бесполезной игрушкой, а третьи уже используют каждый день.
Хочу поделиться искренней рекомендацией.
➡️ Мой коллега, Костя Опескин — эксперт с 16-летним опытом в ресторанном биз…
Добрейшего! Ко Дню ресторатора гастроакадемия STANFOOD собрала папку с каналами преподавателей - практикующих шеф-поваров, кондитеров и пекарей. Они прямо сейчас тестируют новые техники, находят неожиданные сочетания и делятся этим в моменте.
Подписывайтесь на всех одним кликом и будьте не в тренде, а на шаг впереди. С праздником, коллеги!
Ссылка на папку: https://t.me/addlist/ER5WiOnPJ2M4NWFi
Если вы хотите расти и развиваться в сфере HoReCa — это мероприятие для вас.
📍2 июня в 12:00 я проведу бесплатный практикум по внедрению искусственного интеллекта в работу кухни и ресторана вместе с моим коллегой Костей Опескиным.
Костя 16+ лет провел на кухне. Специалист по внедрению ИИ в HoReCa. Был Ex-операционным шеф-поваром альянса White Rabbit Family, через его программы прошли 1000+ специалистов
На встрече…
Запись вебинара с Виталием Луниным.
В комментариях под этим эфиром пишите свои вопросы, с удовольствием отвечу
👍58🔥34👏5🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zabavnikov_team. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Всем Добрейшего🙌 что нас ждёт после 1 апреля в Телеграмм многие слышали. Пойдете в Макс, если создам там группу?
Да. Max уже стоит52%
В раздумьях. Может не заблочат ТГ16%
Нет. У меня VPN32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zabavnikov Ivan” (@zabavnikov_team), 7,067 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zabavnikov_team.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.