Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +1,189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,479–32,223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 02:22
32,022
+94
19 Sept 2026, 10:59
31,928
+41
16 Sept 2026, 23:39
31,887
+26
15 Sept 2026, 04:21
31,861
+3
13 Sept 2026, 10:16
31,858
+143
11 Sept 2026, 15:00
31,715
+893
9 Sept 2026, 00:58
30,822
+75
5 Sept 2026, 15:54
30,747
+31
3 Sept 2026, 15:01
30,716
+28
2 Sept 2026, 09:14
30,688
-9
1 Sept 2026, 11:25
30,697
-6
31 Aug 2026, 09:12
30,703
+15
30 Aug 2026, 06:36
30,688
+8
29 Aug 2026, 04:24
30,680
-6
28 Aug 2026, 02:04
30,686
-12
27 Aug 2026, 01:23
30,698
-4
26 Aug 2026, 03:34
30,702
-6
25 Aug 2026, 04:29
30,708
-27
24 Aug 2026, 02:54
30,735
-7
22 Aug 2026, 11:06
30,742
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.7%
avg views ÷ 32,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
24 (7 June 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
91,470
Reactions total
1,608
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
116
Videos
293
Links
236
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
29m 22s
Average length
2m 56s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,999 reactions across 24 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,692
42.3%
🔥
903
22.6%
❤
660
16.5%
💯
362
9.05%
😱
51
1.28%
🤔
39
0.975%
😁
37
0.925%
👏
30
0.75%
🤡
30
0.75%
🤯
24
0.6%
🥱
21
0.525%
🐳
20
0.5%
😈
18
0.45%
😨
18
0.45%
👎
15
0.375%
🤣
12
0.3%
⚡
10
0.25%
🤬
10
0.25%
😐
7
0.175%
👻
5
0.125%
15 further kinds
35
0.875%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,999 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 24 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zamaznoy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📹Выложи ролик и хотел спросить у вас 🤔
Что вы думаете про 666, это случайность или скрытый знак? 👁
📖 В Библии число зверя из Откровения Иоанна Богослова.
👌В этом жесте некоторые усматривают сразу три шестёрки.
❗️ В штрихкодах есть три длинных разделителя которые означают цифру 6.
🃏 В картах как в математике сумма всех чисел от 1 до 36 равна 666.
🔖В древней символике число 666 связывают с Солнцем и магическими …
💬 Ребята, в связи с детальным разбором переговоров, хочу поговорить про символизм.
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
В январе 2025 года, во время выступления Трампа в Давосе, я обратил внимание на одну деталь: голова орла на фоне была повернута в сторону стрел.
Дело в том, что после Второй мировой войны орёл был развёрнут в сторону оливковой ветви, как символ предпочтения мира.
‼️ Это значило только одно: США готовятся к войне.…
❓Во втором Telegram канале обсуждаем поездку Кушнера, Россия Украина, зачем и с кем встречался и о чём могли говорить за закрытыми дверями.
Разбираем версии, детали и то, что осталось за кадром.
👇👇👇👇
📱Zamaznoy Lab Capital
‼️ Переговоры закончились.
➡️ Почему Москва не демонстрирует готовности идти на серьёзные уступки?
➡️ Почему российская позиция, наоборот, выглядит всё более жёсткой?
➡️ Какие рычаги появились у России?
💬 Что изменилось за последнее время в дипломатии и в отношениях Москвы с Вашингтоном?
👇 Я проведу подробный разобор в нескольких частях. Ставь реакцию, подписывайся, если еще не подписан и поехали!
С ув. Zamaznoy …
‼️ Фильм 1991 года становится жизненной дорожной картой событий 2026 года.
В «Терминаторе 2: Судный день» есть короткий разговор Сары Коннор и Т-800. Сара пытается понять, как началась война с машинами.
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
👇 Я проведу аналогию с сегодняшними событиями:
🎬 Термиратор:
Skynet начал управлять военными истребителями без человека.
🌐 Лето 2026 год. DARPA и ВВС США испытывают ИИ-агента, управляющего F-16…
🌍 Австралия. Что скрывает континент?
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
В прошлом посте я затронул тему закрытой территории Австралии. Я и раньше ее затрагивал, но в текущем контексте все выглядит куда интереснее:
💭 Просто вдумайтесь в цифру 122 000 км². Это почти как площадь всей Англии.
Почему такая огромная часть континента должна быть закрыта?
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
И здесь начинается самое интересное:
Государство Австралии р…
❓ Пролив Дрейка. Обломки древнего мира?
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
Что такое пролив Дрейка?
Сегодня это огромный пролив между Южной Америкой и Антарктидой.
‼️ Но когда-то никакого пролива там не было. Южная Америка, Антарктида и Австралия были частью гиганского массива суши древнего мира, так называемой Гондваны.
Официально версия образования пролива сводится к сдвигу тектонических плит.
🌍 Но если посмотреть на карту,…
📱 Социальные сети могут измениться. Meta судят за их механику.
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
18 августа в федеральном суде Окленда начался процесс против Meta, который может выйти далеко за пределы Facebook и Instagram.
29 штатов США обвиняют компанию в том, что она сознательно проектировала платформы так, чтобы удерживать и подсаживать молодых пользователей.
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
Штаты утверждают, что Meta знала о вредных по…
🚨 В Китае эвакуировали миллионы людей из-за тайфуна «Долфин».
Южная Корея: аномальная жара в городе Yangsan температура достигла 41.4°C. Самое высокое значение за всю историю местных наблюдений с 2008 года.
Гонконг: самый сильный дождь с 1884 года. Между 29 июля и 5 августа было объявлено 4 штормовых предупрежелния.
Нью-Йорк: аномальный дожди. Классифицировано NWS как событие 1-в-1000-лет.
ЕС: тепловой купол над …
💬 После просмотра выступления Харари меня зацепила одна мысль: что на самом деле означает «новый язык ИИ?».
Думаю, речь про новый способ мыслить.
Человек смотрит на систему и ищет закономерность. ИИ смотрит на ту же систему и перебирает тысячи вариантов, которые человек никогда не успеет проверить:
➡️ Юрист ищет одну лазейку в договоре, а ИИ может найти все возможные.
➡️ Экономист строит одну модель, а ИИ может пр…
🤖 Мы думали, что ИИ отберёт у нас работу. Но он отберёт кое-что важнее.
Перевел для вас интеерсное выступление Юваля Ноа Харари на Всемирном экономическом форуме в Давосе, он поднял вопрос, который намного глубже привычного разговора об автоматизации.
Рекомендую к просмотру.
‼️ Речь о том, что произойдёт, если ИИ начнёт писать не просто тексты, а саму систему смыслов, на которой построено общество. То есть, создав…
🔥60👍30❤12😨8🤔6🙉5🤣4👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @zamaznoy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zamaznoy” (@zamaznoy), 32,022 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zamaznoy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.