National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +7,990. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,848–72,432 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:21
71,211
+89
15 Sept 2026, 18:59
71,122
-83
14 Sept 2026, 01:21
71,205
+125
12 Sept 2026, 05:18
71,080
+257
10 Sept 2026, 00:19
70,823
+316
6 Sept 2026, 19:19
70,507
+931
4 Sept 2026, 04:16
69,576
+313
2 Sept 2026, 15:24
69,263
+297
1 Sept 2026, 16:18
68,966
+345
31 Aug 2026, 15:34
68,621
+305
30 Aug 2026, 12:28
68,316
+317
29 Aug 2026, 11:08
67,999
+115
28 Aug 2026, 12:03
67,884
+330
27 Aug 2026, 12:56
67,554
+323
26 Aug 2026, 14:45
67,231
+270
25 Aug 2026, 12:15
66,961
+243
24 Aug 2026, 09:53
66,718
+501
22 Aug 2026, 17:44
66,217
+215
21 Aug 2026, 04:55
66,002
+269
20 Aug 2026, 07:18
65,733
first reading
Engagement
288 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 71,211 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,820
183 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
183
of 288 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
288 (1 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
1,614,840
Reactions total
67,819
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 00:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,040
Videos
≈732
Links
≈8,880
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
28m 01s
Average length
2m 20s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
72,218 reactions across 288 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
38,386
53.2%
❤
17,214
23.8%
👍
6,390
8.85%
🍌
5,070
7.02%
💯
4,234
5.86%
😱
694
0.961%
👎
230
0.318%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 288 of the 288 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72,218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 288 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️⚡️⚡️СРОЧНО
🤫«Тихая» субсидия, которая должна была стать в Россетях громким «триумфом» Алексея Рыбина - ставленника Бориса Эбзеева. Лудоманы³ из энергетики. Как направить в Правительство РФ Михаила Мишустина фиктивный годовой отчет ПАО «Россети Юг», чтобы скрыть свою управленческую несостоятельность. Беспрецедентная история обмана региональной госкомпанией федерального центра
Стало известно о подлоге Годового отче…
«В Шахтах рука руку моет»: как нелегальные ларьки приносят миллионы чиновникам администрации
Мы продолжаем серию расследований о теневых схемах в администрации города Шахты. В центре нашего внимания — деятельность чиновницы Анны Левченко чьи карьерные аппетиты и методы работы уже давно вызывают массу вопросов у общественности.
Пока городские власти пытаются делать вид, что борются за благоустройство, прямо под их нос…
Ростовское судейское ОПС обживается в костромской женской колонии
Экс-председатель советского районного суда города Ростова-на-Дону Елена Коблева в прошедший четверг доехала до ФКУ ИК-8 УФСИН РФ по Костромской области.
В настоящее время преступница пребывает в карантине исправительного учреждения.
Ростовское судейское ОПС (Золотаревой-Юровой-Куделина-Коблевой) встало на паузу
Квалификационная коллегия судей Ростовской области отложила на месяц рассмотрение вопроса о рекомендации на должность председателя Октябрьского районного суда Ростовской области сына шахтинского криминального авторитета Вити Шахтера — Малько Станислава Викторовича.
Пауза взята для выяснения обстоятельств и проверки фактов опубликованных …
ХРОНИКИ МАЙКОПСКОГО ЛЖЕЦА. Лжец изворотливый с гибким стержнем.
ЧАСТЬ 2. ДОГОВОРНЯК МАРЧЕНКО-ГОРЛОВ-СИДОРЕНКО.
Получив обращение о необходимости рассмотрения вопроса о досрочном прекращении полномочий Сидоренко по причине коррупционных правонарушений, Марченко посредством депутата Пароняна собрала комиссию по соблюдению законности, правопорядка и регламента, куда сама пришла в качестве «приглашенной». Естественно, са…
Когда служба действительно опасна
Бывшие правоохранители получили сроки за инсценировки задержаний и поборы
Суд в Москве приговорил бывших сотрудников линейного отдела полиции на станции Москва— Киевская Астемира Шаова и Анвара
Кункаева к пяти и шести годам лишения свободы соответственно.
Вместе с несколькими сообщниками, силовики, среди которых был чемпион мира по тхэквондо Эмин Четинбаг, инсценировали задержание…
Уничтожить бизнес, чтобы объявить его владельца мошенником
Об уголовном деле в отношении ростовского застройщика Максима Омельченко и ООО «Капиталстрой-Инвест»
Продолжение
«Экономика по вере: как завсегдатайница Приемной Зама Инна Хлевняк стала оракулом для потерпевших — и кто на самом деле держал дирижёрскую палочку?»
Дома недостроены?
Да.
Люди заплатили деньги, взяли ипотеки, рассчитывали въехать в собственные дом…
ХРОНИКИ МАЙКОПСКОГО ЛЖЕЦА. Лжец изворотливый с гибким стержнем.
ЧАСТЬ 1. ПРЕДИСЛОВИЕ.
В марте 2024 года в следственный отдел по Белореченскому району поступило заявление в отношении главы района Сидоренко С.В., была проведена проверка. В ходе проверки был опрошен сам Сидоренко, а также иные свидетели, в частности, шестерка правая рука Сидоренко Корниенко Олеся Александровна. Речь шла об инциденте на поле, когда гр. Ч…
В прокуратуре Ленинского района г. Ростова-на-Дону работает помощник прокурора - Чебрикова Наталья, жена пенсионера Чебрикова, которого в свое время «избили» женщины.
Являясь сотрудником прокуратуры Ленинского района, этот персонаж Чебрикова Н. решила закошмарить сотрудников детского сада в Железнодорожном районе областного центра, угрожая им проверками и увольнениями в случае, если её ребенка НЕ БУДУТ ДОПУСКАТЬ к …
Серийная эскортница-мошенница Дарья Шаблий (также любовница нескольких сотрудников ГУ МВД РО)
Более трех десятков обслуженных и выжатых на деньги мужчин, более 200 миллионов материального ущерба. Заявления от потерпевших есть — уголовного дела, нет!
На фото — Дарья Шаблий. Одной рукой держится за кормильца, второй рукой занимает деньги у очередного любовника-спонсора.
Обратная связь:
@Zamvseh_reserve_bot
🔥516🍌388❤9😱5💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 288 posts we hold for @zamuprav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@zamuprav edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 288 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@zamuprav named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@koshikkrd named in 5 posts, 25 August 2026 – 5 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бывший опер👮 (полиция) @buvshuy_oper · 91,498 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
Ростов-на-кону @rostov_na_konu · 93,112 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
Шахты | События | Новости @Shahti_narod · 29,710 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 September 2026
Юрий Слюсарь @Yuri_Slusar · 166,366 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Оперативный обзор @operobzor · 95,455 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Бывший прокурор @anon_prok · 38,384 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Don Mash @don_mash · 79,440 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
АО "Донэнерго" Отключения @ao_donenergo · 38,276 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Бывший следак @exsled · 41,285 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Че по Ростову?💤 @cheRostov · 28,360 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
Новости ОРМ (МВД ПОЛИЦИЯ) @mvdnew · 38,768 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Полицейский подвал @police_podval · 21,999 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
РОСТОВ | СОБЫТИЯ | НОВОСТИ @Rostov_nov · 22,828 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
Ростов №1 @rstv01 · 32,304 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
Блокнот Ростов @bloknot_rostov · 40,051 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
ПОЛИЦИЯ 2.0 @POLICE_2020 · 46,847 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
MDK Ростов @MDK_RnD · 24,391 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Новости Ростова - Rostovnews61 @rostovnews61 · 40,616 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
РОСТОВ ГЛАВНЫЙ - РОСТОВ НОВОСТИ - 161 @rostov_glavniy · 282,834 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Новости Ростова | 161.RU @news161ru · 213,654 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
РОСТОВ ПАПА РОСТОВ-НА-ДОНУ @rostovrnd · 31,455 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Подслушано Ростов-на-Дону @rostov0 · 129,130 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
My_police ( Полиция МВД ) @My_Police · 42,390 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Зам всех управлений” (@zamuprav), 71,211 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zamuprav.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.