Нанимать СММ или нет? Или ты уже платишь ему, но не видишь результат? В большинстве случаев проблема возникает ещё на этапе найма специалиста Я собрала 3 ошибки, из-за которых эксперты сливают деньги на СММ Проверь, есть ли они у тебя 👇
👍2🔥2❤🔥1

Channel
@zapusknalyam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
549subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001455103529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zapusknalyam |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zapusknalyam |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 549 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 554 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 560 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 558 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 559 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 559 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
167 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 74 | 44.3% | |
| ❤ | 32 | 19.2% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 14.4% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 5.39% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 3.59% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.99% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.99% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 2.99% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 2.40% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.599% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.599% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.599% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2025 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нанимать СММ или нет? Или ты уже платишь ему, но не видишь результат? В большинстве случаев проблема возникает ещё на этапе найма специалиста Я собрала 3 ошибки, из-за которых эксперты сливают деньги на СММ Проверь, есть ли они у тебя 👇
👍2🔥2❤🔥1
И ведь не поспоришь😂 Получила в подарок такой забавный календарь с мотивацией на каждый день
🔥4💯3
Кто не в теме. Что тут не так? ⤵️ В таких запросах на поиск человека в проект часто смешивают разные роли в одну. Не потому что хотят сэкономить, а потому что пока не видят границ. А границы тут критичны. Потому что: есть задачи про деньги и решения, есть задачи про настройки и контроль, и есть задачи про упаковку и форму. И когда всё это пытаются засунуть в одного человека - страдать будет не он. Он, скорее всег…
❤6👍3
🚨Частая история на старте проектов. Хочется одного человека, который «всё закроет» - и за кофе сгоняет тоже ☕️ Надо объяснять что тут не так? 🔥- да надо 👎🏻- нет
🔥11👎5
🧳Блогерам дали срок на переезд Новость дня: YouTube в России официально признали вне закона. Полная блокировка через 6, максимум 12 месяцев Причина? Да какая уже разница😂? Куда важнее другой вопрос: что с этим делать тем, у кого там бизнес, а не просто видео «для души»? Платформы не принадлежат нам. Аудитория в них -тоже. Сегодня это YouTube. Завтра - любая другая площадка И я прям вижу, как многие сейчас выдохн…
🔥3👍2💯2
ААаааааааа! Мама я в телевизоре🤩 Друзья, вышел подкаст с интервью со мной для крупнейшей платформы онлайн образования Геткурс🔥 Смотрите, поддерживайте, осуждайте😂, я принимаю любое мнение Youtube https://fu59.short.gy/vD1mxS VK https://fu59.short.gy/VNN2Sh Задать вопросы и связаться со мной можно тут, написав комментарий
❤8🔥6👍3
Уже можно бежать смотреть😍
🔥4❤2
Бывает день, когда понимаешь: ну это точно надо запостить😂, такая новость, как про это молчать? Сегодня был именно такой - я записывала интервью в Геткурсе. Позвали сами чтобы поделилась историей своего успеха в запусках Кружки - маленький кусочек. Остальное расскажу чуть позже. Подглядывайте 👀🔥
❤6🔥5👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Все говорят: Делай контент - будут и продажи А что делать, если ты делаешь контент, а продаж всё равно нет? Если вроде всё правильно - посты, Reels, прогревы, команда пашет - проект всё равно стоит на месте? Вот об этом и поговорим. Я выступаю на конференции REDCONF 3, моя тема - «Красные флаги роста. Почему доход проекта не растёт, хотя вы всё делаете правильно». Там поделюсь своими честными наблюдениями: 📌почем…
🔥8❤3
Чек готовности к рекламным запретам в Нельзяграм с 1 сентября
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zapusknalyam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чек готовности к рекламным запретам в Нельзяграм с 1 сентября
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2025 to 17 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Аннаева | Честный Запускатор🚀” (@zapusknalyam), 549 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zapusknalyam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.