Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for zEINa🤍

Channel

zEINa🤍

@zeina850

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

195subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001853996364
TypeChannel
Username@zeina850
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zeina850

Growth

1942422188 August 2026 — 207 subscribers8 August 2026 — 207 subscribers16 August 2026 — 202 subscribers23 August 2026 — 242 subscribers29 August 2026 — 202 subscribers7 September 2026 — 194 subscribers15 September 2026 — 195 subscribers1958 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 187–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:02195+1
7 Sept 2026, 23:40194-8
29 Aug 2026, 20:46202-40
23 Aug 2026, 17:15242+40
16 Aug 2026, 13:55202-5
8 Aug 2026, 13:15207no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:02207first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

352 reactions across 16 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 57647289890043397264312.2%
custom 5177120588954600739349.66%
custom 5764657645302585152277.67%
custom 6051037676528737066267.39%
custom 5357588887029957116257.10%
custom 5177212531319506852215.97%
custom 5764996591236684244215.97%
custom 6050958163799186432215.97%
custom 6050698013335099760195.40%
custom 5177302162992006716154.26%
custom 5764848217296475773143.98%
custom 6050661982854454341113.13%
custom 4927167781683594652102.84%
custom 6050851356552470450102.84%
custom 492741336791358003482.27%
custom 541784117074934246871.99%
custom 589304300098814821971.99%
custom 517700582313348405561.70%
custom 517719644237201552061.70%
custom 576487958773760573861.70%
4 further kinds154.26%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zeina850. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC11 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/LAW2005f . https://t.me/Law2005fff . https://t.me/ozel20020 . https://t.me/e_yok2 . https://t.me/WithShos . https://t.me/yaffaa45 . https://t.me/az036982 . https://t.me/Athaarr_22 . https://t.me/deniz3654

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

8 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC30 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

لا دا الجمال دا جديد قدامي.. صدفة ويا ريتني عملت حسابي.. واجمدت أنا لا لا لا.. النظرة دي جريئة أوي عجباني.. آه ولا سين ولا جيم أنا شاري.. وسط الكلام بتبينهالي.. وافهمت أنا لا لا لا.. الدخلة دي قديمة أوي نفشاني.. TUL8TE♥️.

custom 58930430009881482197custom 58414200410058334113custom 58415114464998269593custom 57649839081982586052

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

7 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC47 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Frozen: 🌬🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🧊.

custom 605085135655247045010custom 60508039615883576714custom 58415114464998269593custom 49274133679135800342

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

7 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC52 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الشيخ بدر 🥹

custom 49274133679135800346

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

6 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC65 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🧚🏼‍♀🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍:

custom 576484821729647577310custom 57648795877376057386

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

6 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC64 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

².✅ مع تظليل ✨

custom 576472898900433972613

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

6 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC59 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

¹. ✅ دون تظليل ✨

custom 576472898900433972612

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

5 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC61 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

حلمك قدي كلفك؟! أخسر سنة من عمري، أمرض، أبكي، أسهر، أتعذب، أحرق دمي، أحارب، أمشي مسافات طويلة، أخاف من الوقت، أرجف من الفشل، أفكر لدرجة ما نام، أبتعد عن محيطي، أشوف الليالي البيضاء، أعتزل عن أمور بحبها، أتخلى عن قعدات العيلة، أتوحد في غرفتي لأيام.

custom 576472898900433972618custom 57648482172964757734

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

4 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC93 views31 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

رسمياا علامتي بالرياضيات عرس 😏♥️♥️♥️

custom 605103767652873706626custom 60506980133350997605

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

3 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC91 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

وما يؤخر إلا ليعوض.

custom 605069801333509976014

Signed 𝔃𝓮𝓲𝓷𝓪

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zeina850. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فيروز Fairouz
@Fairouziat · 43,987
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“zEINa🤍” (@zeina850), 195 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeina850.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.