Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for zemtsova

Channel

zemtsova

@zemtsova_lub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

90,808subscribers

-8,146 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001156756620
TypeChannel
Username@zemtsova_lub
DescriptionОфициальный тг Земцовой Любови Сообщество ВК https://vk.com/zemtsova_lubov ПРАВИЛА ЧАТА https://telegra.ph/PRAVILA-LYUBAHA-O-VAZHNOM-07-21 РКН зарегистрирован
CreatedBetween 1 September 2018 and 31 May 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zemtsova_lub

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

90,80898,95494,88110 September 2026 — 98,954 subscribers10 September 2026 — 98,954 subscribers12 September 2026 — 98,681 subscribers13 September 2026 — 98,262 subscribers15 September 2026 — 98,084 subscribers17 September 2026 — 97,676 subscribers25 September 2026 — 96,722 subscribers3 October 2026 — 95,725 subscribers8 October 2026 — 95,163 subscribers12 October 2026 — 94,662 subscribers14 October 2026 — 94,528 subscribers15 October 2026 — 94,250 subscribers16 October 2026 — 94,014 subscribers17 October 2026 — 93,886 subscribers18 October 2026 — 93,750 subscribers19 October 2026 — 93,558 subscribers20 October 2026 — 93,348 subscribers21 October 2026 — 93,088 subscribers22 October 2026 — 92,966 subscribers23 October 2026 — 92,836 subscribers24 October 2026 — 92,755 subscribers25 October 2026 — 92,639 subscribers26 October 2026 — 92,461 subscribers28 October 2026 — 92,319 subscribers29 October 2026 — 92,185 subscribers30 October 2026 — 92,036 subscribers30 October 2026 — 91,858 subscribers31 October 2026 — 91,769 subscribers1 November 2026 — 91,691 subscribers2 November 2026 — 91,460 subscribers3 November 2026 — 91,324 subscribers4 November 2026 — 91,186 subscribers5 November 2026 — 91,082 subscribers6 November 2026 — 90,977 subscribers7 November 2026 — 90,917 subscribers8 November 2026 — 90,808 subscribers10 September 20268 November 2026
36 measurements spanning 60 days, net -8,146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89,586–100,176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 23:4990,808-109
7 Nov 2026, 17:2090,917-60
6 Nov 2026, 19:4190,977-105
5 Nov 2026, 15:4791,082-104
4 Nov 2026, 13:4691,186-138
3 Nov 2026, 13:2791,324-136
2 Nov 2026, 15:0891,460-231
1 Nov 2026, 16:3691,691-78
31 Oct 2026, 18:4991,769-89
30 Oct 2026, 21:4491,858-178
30 Oct 2026, 01:0892,036-149
29 Oct 2026, 01:0992,185-134
28 Oct 2026, 01:2092,319-142
26 Oct 2026, 22:3892,461-178
25 Oct 2026, 21:3692,639-116
24 Oct 2026, 19:5792,755-81
23 Oct 2026, 22:4192,836-130
22 Oct 2026, 19:4792,966-122
21 Oct 2026, 17:4593,088-260
20 Oct 2026, 12:2093,348first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 120 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 90,808 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,200
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held69 (2 September 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total552,719
Reactions total18,656
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 06:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,600
Videos
≈1,370
Links
≈177

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 42s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

41,256 reactions across 69 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤30,87874.8%
💘3,6768.91%
💋2,0144.88%
😍1,6263.94%
🥰1,3903.37%
🤣4441.08%
😱3410.827%
👍1670.405%
🤗1570.381%
😁1010.245%
🍾980.238%
🦄860.208%
😈690.167%
🙏560.136%
🌭480.116%
🗿360.087%
🤬320.078%
😢310.075%
🤯60.015%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
43
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 69 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zemtsova_lub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 69 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 September 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 08:57 UTC≈11,900 views719 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Когда я была беременна, я очень боялась, что я не полюблю второго ребёнка я настолько сильно люблю и обожаю Мишель, что в моей голове не укладывалось, как у меня может хватить любви еще на кого-то я боялась, что даже если и будут какие-то чувства, то это и на 10% не будет такой же любовью как к Мишель Но природа не глупая, материнский инстинкт штука коварная, а женское тело удивительное!! я люблю этого пирожочек …

❤582🥰64💋57💘11👍3🤬2

2 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC≈12,400 views482 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤361😍55🤬17💘16🤣12😁8💋6🙏5

1 Nov 2026, 18:25 UTC≈15,800 views1,018 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

переход года 🍼😁

❤793💘115🥰73💋16😍11😱5🦄3🙏2

1 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTC≈15,900 views706 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

декрет декретом, а шабаш по расписанию🖤 🎃

❤552💘71🍾43😍16😈9💋7👍6🥰1

30 Oct 2026, 15:14 UTC≈15,100 views450 reactionsread 9 November 2026

хотели бы такую маму себе?😂

❤338🤣45💘29🥰13🙏7😁6💋5🤬4

30 Oct 2026, 15:14 UTC≈14,500 views527 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤394🤣78🥰34💘11🌭4🍾3😁2🙏1

30 Oct 2026, 11:20 UTC≈15,400 views349 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026

потому что сейчас я реально могу спокойно позавтракать, я реально могу сходить в душ, работать спокойно. Ну не прям спокойно, но МОГУ. И это у нас дома еще трехлеточка А вот если Макс выйдет на работу (потенциально через месяц), вот так начнется веселуха….

❤294🥰26💋21💘6😁1🙏1

30 Oct 2026, 11:18 UTC≈16,000 views369 reactionsread 9 November 2026

знаете, что я поняла? материнство, когда у тебя рядом есть еще две руки - сииильно отличается, от материнства, где ты бОльшую часть времени одна Макс два месяца в декрете, и это, вообще не сравнится с теми временами, когда я была с Мишель одна. Ни сходить в туалет нормально, ни попить кофе, ни сходить в душ. Вообще ничего. А сейчас ГОРААААЗДО ЛЕГЧЕ. Буквально Лайт. Несмотря на то, что Леон ручной - я вообще от него…

❤314💋31💘22👍2

29 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC≈16,400 views1,086 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026
Photo

Ааааа прикиньте 😍

❤868😍121🤣41💘17💋15🍾13🥰7🗿2

28 Oct 2026, 15:51 UTC≈15,900 views390 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤322🥰33🤗22😍8💘4🤬1

27 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈16,900 views694 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Одеваемся на улицу, положила его на диван, через пару минут смотрю – уснул.. Магия..

❤592💘57💋35🦄6🥰4

26 Oct 2026, 10:42 UTC≈17,500 views511 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

вообще не успеваю насладиться Леоном😭 это, пожалуй, самое сложное со вторым малышом. нет такой роскоши, как с первым - 100% внимания кстати, вы как-то выстраивали малышам режим? И когда начинали? Мы сейчас подстраиваемся под режим Мишель и я понимаю, что Леон может недосыпать и для него в целом такой поздний режим Мишель не оч

❤437👍34💘28😈5💋3🥰3🌭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @zemtsova_lub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

annyawell
@annyawell_gg · 63,981
#1
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 605,590
#2
Маша и Роберт (Герберы)
@thegerberslive · 623,427
#3
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 241,537
#4
Marinelloff
@marinelloff · 117,421
#5
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 189,587
#6
кристюшкина😋
@mskaramelka01 · 272,749
#7
КАТЯ ДИМА
@katyashkuro · 155,944
#8
Marchenko_liza
@lizonnnnn · 37,956
#9
Место доброты ✨
@kris_s_dobrom · 109,174
#10
Elena Raytman
@elenaraytman · 843,580
#11
🎀Karna.val🎀
@karnava1l · 279,479
#12
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 731,367
#13
Милана Хаметова
@MILASHKINATELEGKA · 200,500
#14
HAHALIVARS
@hahalivars · 123,332
#15
Гаврилина зе бест :3
@Gavril1nna · 137,035
#16
✨КСЮШИНЫ ИСТОРИИ✨
@tinycrazy · 40,468
#17
АНЯ POKROV🥑
@pokrov90avocado · 242,332
#18
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 923,335
#19
ЭМИЛЬ И ЕГО СЕМЬЯ
@emiltelegramm · 141,441
#20
Alexandra Trusova
@avtrusovaofficial · 238,572
#21
Даня Титов
@titovtut · 47,306
#22
Москва Live
@msk_live · 1,800,644
#23
AdrenalinHouse
@dance_adrenalin · 314,777
#24
хей! это марьяна!
@marillokelhere · 270,589
#25
ПОЛЯ ТУТ
@polya_tut_official · 153,328
#26
Влад Бумага A4
@A4omg · 439,433
#27
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 217,975
#28
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 143,796
#29
Мусим Ашуров
@musim_ashurov · 203,703
#30
Камиллка
@kamilleroffical · 15,356
#31
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 672,921
#32
ITS ANGELINA 🪩
@beautygirlszz · 24,977
#33
Зум
@zvezdach_zoom · 27,830
#34
BEAUTY KOSHKA
@beautykoshechka · 2,325
#35
Глент 🚀
@vladglenttg · 568,251
#36
By Karina Ko💋
@bykarinako · 21,450
#37
Мирослава Быкова
@bykovamiroslava · 74,536
#38
Kamila Valieva
@kamilavalieva26official · 147,568
#39
Cozy, Tea & Lee ♡˖
@skyoctoberlee · 89,331
#40
VEIGEL
@adelveigelll · 327,605
#41
Avonri
@avonri_a · 15,039
#42
Бадабумчик
@badabum4ikkk · 122,180
#43
daryana
@d_gallavichh · 87,099
#44
VSHUMILOV
@vshumilov7 · 23,743
#45

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ваша Ная👩🏼‍🍼
@brai_sa · 20,038
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 25 September 2026
Поли топ | POLI 🩷
@poli_top · 39,642
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“zemtsova” (@zemtsova_lub), 90,808 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zemtsova_lub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.