Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zemtsova__nastya

Channel

Zemtsova__nastya

@zemtsovanastya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

78,319subscribers

-4,839 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002004417421
TypeChannel
Username@zemtsovanastya
DescriptionЗдесь про похудение и мою жизнь 💖 по всем вопросам писать в службу заботы @dramaelg Номер заявления в Роскомнадзор: №6870965274
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/zemtsovanastya

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

78,31983,68381,0017 August 2026 — 83,158 subscribers7 August 2026 — 83,158 subscribers7 August 2026 — 83,169 subscribers9 August 2026 — 83,211 subscribers10 August 2026 — 83,409 subscribers11 August 2026 — 83,506 subscribers12 August 2026 — 83,419 subscribers13 August 2026 — 83,476 subscribers14 August 2026 — 83,529 subscribers16 August 2026 — 83,630 subscribers17 August 2026 — 83,683 subscribers18 August 2026 — 83,610 subscribers19 August 2026 — 83,496 subscribers20 August 2026 — 83,348 subscribers21 August 2026 — 83,359 subscribers22 August 2026 — 83,410 subscribers24 August 2026 — 83,265 subscribers25 August 2026 — 83,205 subscribers26 August 2026 — 83,082 subscribers27 August 2026 — 82,990 subscribers28 August 2026 — 82,902 subscribers29 August 2026 — 82,835 subscribers30 August 2026 — 82,748 subscribers31 August 2026 — 82,645 subscribers1 September 2026 — 82,559 subscribers2 September 2026 — 82,461 subscribers3 September 2026 — 82,247 subscribers6 September 2026 — 81,928 subscribers9 September 2026 — 81,468 subscribers11 September 2026 — 81,099 subscribers13 September 2026 — 80,928 subscribers15 September 2026 — 80,764 subscribers17 September 2026 — 80,559 subscribers19 September 2026 — 80,244 subscribers26 September 2026 — 79,283 subscribers4 October 2026 — 78,319 subscribers7 August 20264 October 2026
36 measurements spanning 58 days, net -4,839. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,514–84,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 17:5678,319-964
26 Sept 2026, 17:3879,283-961
19 Sept 2026, 17:1680,244-315
17 Sept 2026, 05:4080,559-205
15 Sept 2026, 07:2180,764-164
13 Sept 2026, 14:5980,928-171
11 Sept 2026, 20:5781,099-369
9 Sept 2026, 08:3781,468-460
6 Sept 2026, 01:1781,928-319
3 Sept 2026, 21:3982,247-214
2 Sept 2026, 16:0582,461-98
1 Sept 2026, 16:2282,559-86
31 Aug 2026, 13:4482,645-103
30 Aug 2026, 14:5782,748-87
29 Aug 2026, 14:5482,835-67
28 Aug 2026, 13:0782,902-88
27 Aug 2026, 11:3382,990-92
26 Aug 2026, 15:0283,082-123
25 Aug 2026, 14:0283,205-60
24 Aug 2026, 16:0283,265first reading

Engagement

224 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.97%
avg views ÷ 78,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
87 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.786%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 224 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 81 of 87 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held224 (6 August 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total134,290
Reactions total995
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Oct 2026, 15:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,450
Videos
≈757
Links
≈420

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
34m 46s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,565 reactions across 200 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,58961.9%
🔥43617.0%
😁1997.76%
😱813.16%
😭662.57%
👍401.56%
🙏351.36%
👌240.936%
😢230.897%
🥰230.897%
🎉150.585%
🤩140.546%
🕊120.468%
👏80.312%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 204 of the 224 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 224 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 15:09 UTC226 views6 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Video

Девочки это очень смешно 😂 Я на каждой мини выпуклостью просто трясусь ахахахахах

🔥3❤2😁1

7 Oct 2026, 07:24 UTC722 views0 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Photo

Теперь голосование среди старичков, первая 4ка✨ Будет еще одна!

7 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC654 views12 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Photo

Наша победительница среди новичков, кто пришел первый раз, результат за 3 недели ✨🥰 Поздравляем! Жду в лс куда отправить приз

❤10🔥2

6 Oct 2026, 16:09 UTC≈1,070 views14 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Video

Почему похудеть в 20 лет легче, чем в 35+? Болталка на лавке 🙄

❤10👍3🔥1

6 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,000 views13 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Photo

Порадуйтесь за меня. Проблески белой полосы в жизни 😂👍🏻

❤11👍1🔥1

6 Oct 2026, 15:55 UTC838 views0 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Poll

Выбирай победительницу ✨

  1. 117%
  2. 237%
  3. 34%
  4. 441%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Oct 2026, 15:54 UTC885 viewsread 7 October 2026

Всем привет! У нас закончился марафон и время подводить итоги! Мы уже провели первое большое голосование в нашем чате, вам нужно выбрать победительницу. В финал у нас вышло 4 человека 🥰

5 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,410 views11 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Video

Как похудеть после родов. Самый простой совет без подсчета калорий ✨ Подойдет даже тем, кто не рожал Работает на всех 100%

❤10🔥1

5 Oct 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,380 views8 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Video

Ну какой завтра день✨😍 Нужно срочно думать себе подарок!

❤6🔥1🕊1

4 Oct 2026, 18:42 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 7 October 2026
Poll

Сколько у вас обычно уходит в неделю на продукты?

  1. До 5.000₽32%
  2. До 10.000₽39%
  3. До 15.000₽16%
  4. До 20.000₽7%
  5. От 20.00010%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 224 posts we hold for @zemtsovanastya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Oct 2026, 15:55 UTCFinal Results46 voters

Выбирай победительницу ✨

  1. 117%
  2. 237%
  3. 34%
  4. 441%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Oct 2026, 18:42 UTCAnonymous Poll249 voters

Сколько у вас обычно уходит в неделю на продукты?

  1. До 5.000₽32%
  2. До 10.000₽39%
  3. До 15.000₽16%
  4. До 20.000₽7%
  5. От 20.00010%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTCAnonymous Poll151 voters

Как вы относитесь к спорту?

  1. Интересно, средне52%
  2. Не хочу о нем даже думать16%
  3. Очень нужно40%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTCAnonymous Poll137 voters

Не проходите мимо🙏🏻🥰

  1. Я хочу худеть, мне нужны советы по питанию80%
  2. Я уже похудела, мне можно просто рецепты18%
  3. Я вообще не думала худеть, смотрю контент11%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 224 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zemtsova__nastya” (@zemtsovanastya), 78,319 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zemtsovanastya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.