Channel
@zer0_bomber
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,897subscribers
+2,639 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001938808418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zer0_bomber |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zer0_bomber |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 8,897 | +1,879 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 7,018 | +185 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 6,833 | +212 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:04 | 6,621 | +136 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 6,485 | +152 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 6,333 | +18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 6,315 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 6,311 | +24 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 6,287 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 6,277 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 6,270 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:21 | 6,260 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 6,258 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 6,258 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
193 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 42.5% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 19.2% | |
| 👎 | 23 | 11.9% | |
| 😎 | 14 | 7.25% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 5.70% | |
| 💔 | 10 | 5.18% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 4.66% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 2.07% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.518% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بالاخره انتظار تموم شد؛ زیرو بمبر برگشت!👋 💣 بعد از ۵ ماه، دوباره فعال شدیم و قراره شروع دوبارهمون پر از فرصت، جایزه و قابلیتهای جدید باشه!🎉 🎁 🫵و یه فرصت خوب هم گذاشته جلوت!😊 از امروز میتونی با دعوت کردن دوستات، کیف پولت رو شارژ کنی💳 💸 هر دوستی که با لینک دعوت تو وارد زیرو بمبر بشه و خرید انجام بده، ۲۰٪ اعتبار بیشتر از خرید دوستت برای تو ثبت میشه. دعوت بیشتر ✉️= جایزه بیشتر💵 و این تازه شروعشه!🤩 کلی قابلیت …
❤9😱4😁1
دلها هنوز عزادارن…🖤 برای دردهایی که گفتنش سخته...😔 با احترام و همدردی بعد از 4 هفته ربات <<زیرو بمبر>> دوباره در دسترس قرار گرفت. 🤖 @zero_bomber_bot
❤23👎11😁5👍3💔3
به امید آزادی ایران 🌸
👍23👎10💔3❤2
💥 پکیج یلدایی 💥 شب یلداست…🍉 یه شیطنت کوچولو هم لازمه 😏 هرچقدر که بخوای یه نفر خاص ( اون فامیل رو مخه😒) پشت سر هم پیام میره..! ❌نه دعواست، نه جدی فقط یه اذیتِ ریزِ خندهدار 😅 ⚠️عواقبش رو هم که میدونید: ☄️سوختن موبایل ☄️هنگ کردنش ☄️اختلال توی اینترنت ☄️پاک شدن اطلاعات گوشی ☄️گم شدن پیامک های مهم ‼️ تااااازه!! هر وقت فک کردی به اندازه کافی دهنش سرویس شده، میتونی همون لحظه قطعش میکنی ✔️ 🎯 مناسب وقتی که: یه بدخو…
❤11😎5
تو فامیل تو هم حتما یه فامیل رو مخ هست😒🥴 که دوست داری دست بندازیش اگه میخوای امشب بهجای حرص خوردن فقط بخندی 😈🤣 پیام بعدی مخصوص خودته...👇👇👇
❤3👌3😎3
داشتم دنبال راه بیدردسر میگشتم که پسرداییم اومد نزدیک، آروم گفت: «براش بمبر بزن 💥» گفت گوشیشو که ببینه اون همه پیامک اومده براش از ترس و استرس همه سخنرانیاش یادش میره 😬 و بله قرار نیست یلدا زود تموم بشه ولی قراره خیلی خندهدار بگذره 😈
❤5👌4😎2
شب یلدای شما چطور میگذره؟🍉 من کهاز همون لحظهای که رسیدم، فهمیدم امشب قراره طولانی باشه…😪 لبخندای مصنوعی، حرفای تکراری، سکوتای سنگین 😩💔 بعدشم نگاهم قفل شد رو شوهرعمم انگار میکروفن قورت داده بود!🎤 یه لحظه خواستم خفهش کنم…🧞♂ یاد پول دیه افتادم، منصرف شدم 👊😐
😁3❤2💘1
∅ Zero BMB ∅ | زیرو بمبر ـ اسمس بمبر pinned «یه نفری رو داریم که، دلسوزه، اهمیت میده، کمک میکنه، حرف حق میزنه، آدم خفنیه و.. حالا این آدم اگر همزمان :»
یه نفری رو داریم که، دلسوزه، اهمیت میده، کمک میکنه، حرف حق میزنه، آدم خفنیه و.. حالا این آدم اگر همزمان :
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍4
∅ Zero BMB ∅ | زیرو بمبر ـ اسمس بمبر pinned «بواسطهی قطعی و وصلیهای اینترنت و محدودیت هایی که اعمال کردند توی این مدت ربات نیازمند یکسری تغییرات و آپدیت هست. از همین رو ممکنه که تجربه کاربری که قبلا روون بوده براتون رو نداشته باشید و توی بخشهای مختلف یکم مشکل بوجود اومده باشه، اول از همه ازتون عذرخواهی…»
بواسطهی قطعی و وصلیهای اینترنت و محدودیت هایی که اعمال کردند توی این مدت ربات نیازمند یکسری تغییرات و آپدیت هست. از همین رو ممکنه که تجربه کاربری که قبلا روون بوده براتون رو نداشته باشید و توی بخشهای مختلف یکم مشکل بوجود اومده باشه، اول از همه ازتون عذرخواهی میکنیم و بعدش قول میدیم که بزودی با قدرت بیشتری برگردیم و در خدمت شما باشیم. ممنونم بابت اینکه مثل همیشه هوای مارو دارید و از ما حمایت میکنید.🙏❤️ @zer0_bomb…
❤9💔4🦄2👎1
اصلیه همونه که تو این شرایط با هم اساماس بازی میکنید❤️😁✉️ 🤖 @zero_bomber_bot
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zer0_bomber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
یه نفری رو داریم که، دلسوزه، اهمیت میده، کمک میکنه، حرف حق میزنه، آدم خفنیه و.. حالا این آدم اگر همزمان :
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2025 to 4 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“∅ Zero BMB ∅ | زیرو بمبر ـ اسمس بمبر” (@zer0_bomber), 8,897 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zer0_bomber.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.