Channel
@zer0_bomber
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,372subscribers
+15,114 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001938808418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zer0_bomber |
| Description | بدخواه تو🫵بدخواه ماعه👋بدخواهای ما هم به خاک سیاه نشستن🤲 Nobody can BULLY you anymore, you have the cipher power 🫶 آیدی ربات اصلی : @zero_bomber_bot آیدی پشتیبانی : @zer0_bomber_support رضایت شما: @Zero_bomber_rezayat |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 40 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zer0_bomber |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:29 | 21,372 | +19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:29 | 21,353 | +178 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:09 | 21,175 | +128 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:54 | 21,047 | +80 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:37 | 20,967 | +24 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 20,943 | +342 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 20,601 | +114 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 20,487 | +44 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:07 | 20,443 | +48 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:27 | 20,395 | +37 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 20,358 | -26 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 20,384 | +7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:50 | 20,377 | +57 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 20,320 | +86 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 20,234 | +158 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 20,076 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:21 | 20,085 | -30 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 20,115 | +30 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 08:54 | 20,085 | +130 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 19,955 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 17 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (17 June 2025 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 40,870 |
| Reactions total | 117 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
565 reactions across 36 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 275 | 48.7% | |
| 👍 | 79 | 14.0% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 6.19% | |
| 😎 | 34 | 6.02% | |
| 👎 | 31 | 5.49% | |
| 🆒 | 22 | 3.89% | |
| 💘 | 20 | 3.54% | |
| 👌 | 18 | 3.19% | |
| 😈 | 16 | 2.83% | |
| 🤩 | 12 | 2.12% | |
| 💔 | 10 | 1.77% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 1.06% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 0.708% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.531% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2025 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
پکیج تلنگر اینجوری قدرت نمایی کرده ،وای بر حرفه ای و موج دلخواه بیش از صدتا💥😎 رضایت شما قشنگترین دلگرمی ما برای ادامهی این مسیره. 💗 تجربهها و پیامهای واقعی مشتریهامون رو میتونید توی کانال رضایت مشتریان ببینید و باهامون همراه باشید. @zer0_bomber @Zero_bomber_rezayat @Zer0_bomber_support
❤9😈3🤩2👎1💘1
🎁🔥 ببین چه جایزههای خفنی تورقابت جدول امتیازات منتظرته! 💰 جایزه کیف پول یعنی 30٪ از خریدهایی که انجام دادی میاد تو کیف پولت که بتونی باهاش خریدهای بعدیت رو انجام بدی! مثال: 1000.000تومان خرید= 300.000 تومان شارژ کیف پول 💸 ⏰ قابلیت زمانبندی سفارشهاتو از قبل بچین و مشخص کن کی اجرا بشن! 😎 🎫 کارت جایزه یه کارت ویژه میگیری که میتونه بهت تخفیف خرید، تخریب بیشتر یا مقدار اضافه تو سفارشهات بده! 🔥 🏆 حالا بگو ببینیم، کدو…
❤6👍6
وقت رونمایی از جایزههاست! فکر میکنی نفرات برتر مهر چی با خودشون بردن؟ 👀 🎁 جایزه نفر اول: جایزه کیف پول 💰 کارت جایزه 🎫 قابلیت زمانبندی ⏰ 🎁 جایزه نفر دوم: جایزه کیف پول 💰 کارت جایزه 🎫 🎁 جایزه نفر سوم: کارت جایزه 🎫 😏 حالا فهمیدی چرا رقابت اینقدر داغ بود؟ این جایزهها صاحبشون رو پیدا کردن… اما سورپرایزهای بعدی هنوز در راهن! 🎉 @zero_bomber_bot
❤6👎5👍2😎1🆒1
🏆🔥 قهرمانهای جدول امتیازات مهر مشخص شدن! یه ماه رقابت داغ و نفسگیر تموم شد و حالا وقت معرفی بهترینهاست! 🚀 🥇 رتبه اول: [svhnvvcc] 🥈 رتبه دوم: [ashkanniki] 🥉 رتبه سوم: [makeup_tejarat] 🎉 تبریک به قهرمانهای مهر که حسابی ترکوندن و جوایزشون رو دریافت کردن🎁! میخوای بدونی جوایز چی بوده؟😉 🚨 اما حالا نوبت توئه! رقابت آبان شروع شده و صدر جدول منتظر یه قهرمان جدیده! 👑 🔥 امتیاز جمع کن، رقبات رو جا بذار و قهرمان بعدی باش! 🏆 …
❤5🆒2👎1💘1
رضایت شما،باعث افتخار ماست😌❤ «رضایت مشتریان، دلگرمی ما برای ادامهی مسیر است. پیامها و تجربههای واقعیشان را در کانال رضایت مشتریان ببینید.» @zer0_bomber @Zero_bomber_rezayat @Zer0_bomber_support
❤17👌3👍2👎1
یه خبر خوب برای همهی شما 🎉 از این به بعد، بعد از پرداخت فاکتور میتونی جزئیات سفارشت رو توی ربات پیگیریمون ببینی 🧾✨ دیگه لازم نیست دنبال پیامهای قبلی بگردی یا نگران گم شدن اطلاعاتت باشی؛ همهچی مرتب و یهجا جلوی چشمته. 📌 چی توش میبینی؟ • فاکتور سفارشهایی که پرداخت کردی • جزئیات هر سفارش • هر وقت خواستی، سریع و راحت بهش دسترسی داری کافیه برای استفاده از ربات پیگیری همین الان سفارشت رو ثبت کنی 🤖👇 @@zero_bomber_bo…
❤4
📍 این ربات فقط برای پیگیری سفارشه. برای ثبت سفارش از ربات اصلی استفاده کن 👇
❤3
Posted without readable text
❤20👍8🆒6🍓1
و بات بهمون یه فاکتور نهایی میده که بتونیم سفارشمون رو پیگیری کنیم و در صورت مهربونی لغو کنیم🥴 و خط اول از لحظه ی اجرا شدن تا اتمامش بهمون میگه😎🧨 @zero_bomber_bot
❤16😈5💘3😎3
دو روش ثبت سفارش ✅ از کیف پولت استفاده کنی که راحت ترینه🤌 یا وارد درگاه بشی و نهایی کنی سفارشت رو😎💥 @zero_bomber_bot
❤6😁3😈3😎3💘2
می رسیم به اصل مطلب و پیچ آخر مسیر😁☄ شماره بده جنازه تحویل بگیر: @zero_bomber_bot
❤5🍓2👌1💘1🤩1🦄1😁1😈1
لیست پکیج های بمبر برامون بالا میاد👀 بسته به خشم درونی و مقدار جدی بودن شوخیمون بسته رو انتخاب میکنیم🤭💥 مثلا برای اون هم کلاسی رو مخم حرفه ای بهترین گزینه است😒 @zero_bomber_bot
❤4😁3👌2😎2🤩1😈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @zer0_bomber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
یه نفری رو داریم که، دلسوزه، اهمیت میده، کمک میکنه، حرف حق میزنه، آدم خفنیه و.. حالا این آدم اگر همزمان :
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2025 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“∅ Zero BMB ∅ | زیرو بمبر ـ اسمس بمبر” (@zer0_bomber), 21,372 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zer0_bomber.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.