Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
45 measurements spanning 78 days, net -1,192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 143,208–144,766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 04:26
143,388
-7
23 Oct 2026, 00:59
143,395
-29
22 Oct 2026, 00:57
143,424
-40
20 Oct 2026, 18:59
143,464
-18
19 Oct 2026, 20:45
143,482
-23
18 Oct 2026, 21:48
143,505
-31
17 Oct 2026, 19:37
143,536
-23
16 Oct 2026, 20:00
143,559
-4
15 Oct 2026, 19:21
143,563
-29
14 Oct 2026, 20:11
143,592
-47
13 Oct 2026, 12:28
143,639
-57
9 Oct 2026, 08:41
143,696
-32
4 Oct 2026, 19:02
143,728
-32
26 Sept 2026, 23:21
143,760
-103
17 Sept 2026, 12:55
143,863
-33
15 Sept 2026, 13:57
143,896
+6
14 Sept 2026, 00:18
143,890
-37
12 Sept 2026, 09:15
143,927
-36
10 Sept 2026, 02:55
143,963
-88
6 Sept 2026, 20:56
144,051
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.12%
avg views ÷ 143,388 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,100
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.398%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held
43 (30 April 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total
143,798
Reactions total
573
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 15:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
187
Links
169
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,078 reactions across 43 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,459
60.3%
🔥
1,129
27.7%
👍
490
12.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,078 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔅 Developing LLM Apps with LangChain
⏲ 4 hours 📁 41 Lessons
📔 This byte-sized course will teach you how to build state-of-the-art LLM-powered applications with LangChain, Pinecone, and Python! This is the perfect way to start learning about the world of AI application development.
🎙 Taught by: Andrei Dumitrescu
📤 Download Full Course 📤 Download All Courses
💡 Your Gateway to Exclusive Content
🔐 What is The Premium Vault?
We are a private Telegram channel dedicated to delivering high-quality, premium content that you simply cannot find through ordinary searches, free platforms, or standard telegram channels. Every piece of content inside this vault is carefully collected, researched, and created exclusively for our members.
📦 What’s Inside?
1⃣ Tutorials, and resources…
🔅 PREMIUM CHANNELS
-◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--◦-
🔰 Web Development
-◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--
217k| 🔰 Linkedin Learning
143k| 🔰 Zero To Mastery
133k| 🔰 Web Development
-◦-◦--◦-
125k| 🔰 Learn Python 3
096k| 🔰 Learn JavaScript
096k| 🔰 Machine Learning
-◦-◦--◦-
071k| 🔰 Artificial Intelligence
070k| 🔰 Data Analysis and Databases
068k| 🔰 Linux and DevOps
-◦-◦--◦-
062k| 🔰 React and NextJs
052k| 🔰 Business and Finance
051k| …
📊 Links for the next poll:
- Developing LLM Apps with LangChain
https://zerotomastery.io/courses/learn-langchain-pinecone/
- DevOps Mastery: Secure Your Internet Traffic with WireGuard VPN
https://zerotomastery.io/courses/wireguard-vpn-guide/
- DESIGN RULES: Principles + Practices for Great UI Design
https://www.udemy.com/course/design-rules/
- Low Level System Design, Design Patterns & SOLID Principles
https://www.…
⭐️ Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026)
Fighting crime full-time as Spider-Man in a world that doesn't remember him—and the pressure of seeing his old friends move on without him—sparks a change in Peter Parker he may not have the power to control. But that transformation might also be the only thing that can stop a shocking new threat to the city and those he loves - a powerful villain no one can even see.
🔒 VIP Exclu…
🔅 PREMIUM CHANNELS
-◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--◦-
🔰 Web Development
-◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--◦--◦-◦--
217k| 🔰 Linkedin Learning
143k| 🔰 Zero To Mastery
133k| 🔰 Web Development
-◦-◦--◦-
125k| 🔰 Learn Python 3
096k| 🔰 Learn JavaScript
095k| 🔰 Machine Learning
-◦-◦--◦-
071k| 🔰 Artificial Intelligence
070k| 🔰 Data Analysis and Databases
067k| 🔰 Linux and DevOps
-◦-◦--◦-
062k| 🔰 React and NextJs
052k| 🔰 Business and Finance
051k| …
💡 Your Gateway to Exclusive Content
🔐 What is The Premium Vault?
We are a private Telegram channel dedicated to delivering high-quality, premium content that you simply cannot find through ordinary searches, free platforms, or standard telegram channels. Every piece of content inside this vault is carefully collected, researched, and created exclusively for our members.
📦 What’s Inside?
1⃣ Tutorials, and resources…
🔰 The Data Science Course: Complete Data Science Bootcamp 2026
🌟 4.5 - 161431 votes 💰 Original Price: $59.99
📖 Complete Data Science Training: Math, Statistics, Python, Advanced Statistics in Python, Machine and Deep Learning
🔊 Taught By: 365 Careers
📤 Download Full Course 📤 Download All Courses
⭐️ Walking with Dinosaurs
Each episode tells the dramatic story of an individual dinosaur whose remains are currently being unearthed by world-leading dinosaur hunters. As the dinosaurs' bones emerge from the ground, their prehistoric stories are brought to life with state-of-the-art visual effects - making each episode a gripping dinosaur drama based on the very latest evidence.
🔒 VIP Exclusive
This documentary is…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @zero_to_mastery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ultimate Web Development Course 2026 - Build Modern Websites41%
Raspberry Pi For Beginners - 2026 Complete Course16%
Master Redis - From Beginner to Advanced, 20+ hours17%
MongoDB - The Complete Developer's Guide10%
Python Django - The Practical Guide17%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 19 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@zero_to_mastery named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@react_training named in 2 posts, 3 October 2026 – 9 October 2026 · confirmed gone 18 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zero To Mastery” (@zero_to_mastery), 143,388 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zero_to_mastery.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.