Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,686–4,740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 13:17
4,692
-2
12 Sept 2026, 05:00
4,694
-7
7 Sept 2026, 20:01
4,701
-12
2 Sept 2026, 15:34
4,713
-2
30 Aug 2026, 07:03
4,715
-5
27 Aug 2026, 01:12
4,720
-4
20 Aug 2026, 09:22
4,724
+15
17 Aug 2026, 11:58
4,709
-3
13 Aug 2026, 23:24
4,712
-6
11 Aug 2026, 01:22
4,718
-15
8 Aug 2026, 01:25
4,733
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:03
4,734
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:59
4,734
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
159 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
69
43.4%
custom 5377351427423250563
67
42.1%
😍
19
11.9%
🤯
4
2.52%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
WIPO | 21 августа на ZHARA POOL FEST
Тот, чьи треки разорвали чарты и их слушает вся страна, выступит в Ростове этим летом на большом фестивале с бассейном!
WIPO - исполнитель хитов «Гламур», «Бичес», «Ох какая бейби» и других
Стань частью этой истории!
🎫 КУПИТЬ БИЛЕТ
❗️ПИШИ В КОММЕНТАРИЯХ СЛОВО «ФЕСТ» И МЫ ОТПРАВИМ ТЕБЕ ПРОМОКОД НА СКИДКУ❗️
21 АВГУСТА / 22:00 / РОСТОВ-НА-ДОНУ / EMBARGO VILLA @embargo_villa
18…
ZHARA ЛЕТО ФЕСТ | ВОРОНЕЖ | 22 АВГУСТА
Большой фестиваль под открытым небом в Воронеже!
Успей насладиться этим летом по полной!
Специальными гостями на фестивале станут прорывные артисты этого года, исполнители которые обрели миллионы прослушиваний, а их хиты звучат повсюду!
ЛИЛ КИДД - автор таких хитов как «Тамагочи», «Красива» и многих других!
YG IMMA - разрывает чарты с треком «TAMAM»
Шоу-кейс ZHARACREW и шоу…
У кого есть тг каналы от 300 подписчиков, напишите - @zharacrewpromo
Есть предложения по сотрудничеству!
В сообщение укажите:
1. Свой канал (ссылка/тег)
2. Город
3. Хэштег - #ворк
(Инстаграм с активной аудиторией от 1000 подписчиков - тоже пишите)
FACE 2 FACE | 24 АВГУСТА | РОСТОВ
Нашумевший формат ФЕЙС ТУ ФЕЙС в Ростове! Большое стафф шоу, где диджеи сойдутся в битве лицом к лицу при поддержке главных МС города!
24 августа в понедельник делаем свободный вход для всех в самом центре города! Начало 22:00
🏠 Площадка: GASGAS | Кировский пр., 51
FC/DC 18+
*За репост афиши в сторис каждому дарим сет настоек на баре! Репост должен быть сделан до дня мероприятия
❗️ПЯТИГОРСК! Сегодня в 23:59 повышение цен на вечеринку с бассейном ZHARA POOL
Успей забрать свой билет по самой выгодной цене!
🎫 КУПИТЬ БИЛЕТ
custom 53773514274232505634🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @zharacrewrnd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@zharacrewrnd edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZHARACREW” (@zharacrewrnd), 4,692 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zharacrewrnd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.