подпишитесь на кисуню и реакций наставьте🌟

Channel
zhelusik
@zhelusikkk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,432subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001988865048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhelusikkk |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhelusikkk |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 14,432 | +7 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 14,425 | +17 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 14,408 | -26 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 14,434 | +21 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 14,413 | -44 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 14,457 | -45 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 14,502 | -18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:46 | 14,520 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 14,524 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 14,543 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 14,551 | +11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 14,540 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 14,569 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 14,574 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 14,569 | -26 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 14,595 | -26 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 14,621 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 14,643 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 14,657 | +14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 14,643 | first reading |
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.97%
- avg views ÷ 14,432 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,440
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.35%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (24 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 15,827 |
| Reactions total | 1,078 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 48s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,306 reactions across 32 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5269340606315930116 | 2,627 | 41.7% | |
| custom 5456512845829152075 | 1,558 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5206656159926236542 | 788 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5458621159375413437 | 505 | 8.01% | |
| custom 5206332809018386294 | 429 | 6.80% | |
| custom 5282906015707200070 | 287 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5307972999624828384 | 112 | 1.78% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1,278
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 13
- of 37 we hold a reading for · 35%
- Most on one post
- 1,110
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zhelusikkk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🌟
custom 520665615992623654257custom 526934060631593011618
что вы, школьнички))) всем удачи💋 знайте, вы всегда можете напиздеть на всех в моем чате, и мы вас не осудим
custom 520665615992623654299custom 526934060631593011634
сабаемся, у нас тут редко мущщины 😛
custom 52066561599262365423
Ain’t🌟 мой друг начал вести тг канал, подписываемся все срочно, оч красивые фоткииии <3 ⭐️ 💚 https://t.me/jeudeVie SUB SUB SUB
custom 520665615992623654212custom 52693406063159301163
Video, posted without a caption
custom 5206656159926236542141custom 526934060631593011669
что вы лайков мне накидаете а
custom 526934060631593011624custom 52066561599262365421
доброе утро, самые красивые люди мира
custom 5269340606315930116100custom 520665615992623654258
мама дома🌟
custom 5269340606315930116282custom 5206656159926236542134
мояяя🖤🖤🖤 подписку
моя любимая кошка наконец-то вернулась в тг https://t.me/fukkfukkfukkkkk 🖤 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ SUBSCRIBE <3
custom 526934060631593011632custom 520665615992623654211
все будет хорошо
custom 5206656159926236542272custom 5269340606315930116122
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @zhelusikkk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“zhelusik” (@zhelusikkk), 14,432 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhelusikkk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.