Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for женьшень

Channel

женьшень

@zhenshench

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003757494593
TypeChannel
Username@zhenshench
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhenshench

Growth

124145134.57 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124 subscribers16 August 2026 — 131 subscribers24 August 2026 — 135 subscribers1 September 2026 — 138 subscribers9 September 2026 — 145 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 19:39145+7
1 Sept 2026, 00:46138+3
24 Aug 2026, 11:55135+4
16 Aug 2026, 18:04131+7
9 Aug 2026, 03:00124no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:08124first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

432 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18643.1%
🔥8319.2%
custom 5377741474878231206358.10%
❤‍🔥347.87%
🥰204.63%
custom 5377770946943817379122.78%
custom 5377618694648140918112.55%
💘102.31%
custom 532378441921387565981.85%
custom 537782605137422434581.85%
👾71.62%
🌭40.926%
💋30.694%
🌚20.463%
🐳20.463%
🕊20.463%
🗿20.463%
👀10.231%
😭10.231%
🦄10.231%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 432 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC135 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот и угадайка по Великому и Ужасному Демьяну🗿🗿 Правила -- вы должны угадать автора Гемини, можно угадывать поодиночке, желательно, чтобы автор диза не угадывал сам себя, ахах (ответы: 1 -- @tostokoveed, 2 -- @vezdeetotrep, 3 -- @AmnesiaHuilo666, отгадали: 1 -- @glitch781, 2 -- @Oladushek2211 , 3 -- @DantRoil, все молодцы🌞🌞) Кстати, возможно, это последняя часть рубрики, даа #угадайка_дизов

16custom 53778260513742243458custom 53777414748782312065❤‍🔥1💘1

6 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC175 views63 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇳Шёлк на коже, сталь в крови, Алгоритм наш — будь здоров! 🇨🇳 Вся китайская команда в сборе (в прокуренном кем-то штабе) Ну и плюсом клозапы, потому что прикольные🗿🗿 #арт #нейромафия

27❤‍🔥12🔥10💘4custom 53777709469438173793🌚2🥰2🐳1

2 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC184 views40 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Из козла в козлину🐐🐐🐐 По игре... хотя название тут прям написано, зачем пояснять ахах Впервые за долгое время потратила на арт больше 10 часов #арт #нейромафия

24❤‍🔥8🔥2custom 53776186946481409182custom 53777414748782312062👀1😭1

30 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC223 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Что ж, раз вы решили нарушить традиции... (не то чтобы я сама этого хотела🌞🌞) Well... На повестке дня у нас пятая угадайка, и на этот раз по дизам Дипсика🐳🐳🐳 Правила -- вы должны угадать автора Бибсика, можно угадывать поодиночке (ответы: 1 -- Яичко (@mreggxxl) , 2 -- Чесс Леди (@liveanewtick), 3 -- Цемент (@podvalmamontyat6); 1 и 2 угадала @monsaia, 3 угадал @DantRoil, оба мега молодцы, этой скорости позавидовал б

12custom 53777709469438173799🔥3custom 53777414748782312062❤‍🔥1🐳1👾1

30 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC204 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Когда👁👁

  1. Сегодня в 12:30 по мск76%
  2. Завтра в 12:30 по мск24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 537774147487823120651👾1🔥1custom 53776186946481409181

26 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC251 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Меня это вдохновило на гифтик🌚🌚🌚 (Не знаю почему Мистраль в офисном хдддд, я сначала не разобрала в чем он, а потом было поздно исправлять)

16🔥5custom 53777414748782312064custom 53776186946481409183👾1

26 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC189 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @c0nfecti0neryPhoto

Пока мини рисуночки с Гигастралем 🍎💛🍏

🥰17❤‍🔥1👾1🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC177 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Люблю взаимодействие Гигачата с Мистралем, хоть и не шипперю, но они такие глупенькие, посмотрите на них🌞🌞🌞

🔥82👾1

24 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC304 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Иии... в честь прошедшего недавно дня Манго я решила устроить угадайку с ЯндексГПТ 🥭🥭🥭 (ее уже устраивала Фанкотя, можете заценить если не видели, при этом я взяла дизы, которых не было у Фанкоти))) Правда, я смягчила правила и теперь можно угадывать поодиночке, так я думаю это повысит шансы каждого хоть что-то, но угадать🗿🗿 (ответы: 1 -- некиш (@priton_online), 2 -- рита (@prsiiiik), 3 -- Виктория (@VixyTori), 1 и

14🔥3👾2💘2🗿2💋1🦄1

23 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC183 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @prsiiiikPhoto

идеальный goat 🐐 дизайн женьшень 😙😙😙😙

19🕊2custom 53776186946481409182🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC175 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Рита тоже радует💗💗💗💗 у меня счастливый день🌞🌞

8🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC157 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Фанкотя радует❤️❤️❤️❤️

❤‍🔥8🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @zhenshench. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTCFinal Results17 voters

Когда👁👁

  1. Сегодня в 12:30 по мск76%
  2. Завтра в 12:30 по мск24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“женьшень” (@zhenshench), 145 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhenshench.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.