Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Жители Шилово (Воронеж)

Channel

Жители Шилово (Воронеж)

@zhitely_vrn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,161subscribers

+279 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796317282
TypeChannel
Username@zhitely_vrn
Description⚡︎ Самый большой канал Жителей Шилово (г.Воронеж) По рекламе: Напрямую @zhitely_vrn_info_bot Площадки telega.in/c/zhitely_vrn и tele-port.me/c/12965 РКН gosuslugi.ru/snet/67376d4523bfbf2cbf4578f3
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhitely_vrn

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,87018,18918,029.57 August 2026 — 17,882 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,882 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,883 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,881 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,884 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,888 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,889 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,888 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,898 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,905 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,906 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,907 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,906 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,870 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,908 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,920 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,914 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,919 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,928 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,923 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,928 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,926 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,921 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,919 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,940 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,939 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,933 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,936 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,930 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,932 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,926 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,923 subscribers30 September 2026 — 17,994 subscribers6 October 2026 — 18,014 subscribers10 October 2026 — 18,036 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,049 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,056 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,064 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,058 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,059 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,061 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,059 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,053 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,060 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,066 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,165 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,151 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,169 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,189 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,179 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,173 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,172 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,174 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,166 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,164 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,165 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,169 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,166 subscribers6 November 2026 — 18,161 subscribers18,1617 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net +279. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,822–18,237 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 02:5718,161-5
5 Nov 2026, 01:2018,166-3
4 Nov 2026, 01:2918,169+4
3 Nov 2026, 04:5518,165+1
2 Nov 2026, 06:1818,164-2
1 Nov 2026, 07:3718,166-8
31 Oct 2026, 07:0418,174+2
30 Oct 2026, 07:1018,172-1
29 Oct 2026, 10:3118,173-6
28 Oct 2026, 11:5718,179-10
27 Oct 2026, 09:3118,189+20
26 Oct 2026, 06:1718,169+18
25 Oct 2026, 09:0618,151-14
24 Oct 2026, 06:4618,165+99
23 Oct 2026, 05:4118,066+6
22 Oct 2026, 07:5518,060+7
21 Oct 2026, 04:3618,053-6
20 Oct 2026, 03:0818,059-2
19 Oct 2026, 05:0918,061+2
18 Oct 2026, 01:5118,059first reading

Engagement

634 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.65%
avg views ÷ 18,161 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.602%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 634 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 86 of 96 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held634 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total98,423
Reactions total529
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈41,900
Videos
≈8,200
Links
≈31,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
31m 21s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 119 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,122 reactions across 508 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤68722.0%
🔥35411.3%
👍35111.2%
😁2457.85%
🦄1615.16%
😱1514.84%
🤯1494.77%
custom 63258648212542611481163.72%
👏1043.33%
custom 5375135722514685501862.75%
❤‍🔥862.75%
💯812.59%
👀742.37%
🙊742.37%
🙏662.11%
💔481.54%
🥰441.41%
💘411.31%
😨391.25%
🕊341.09%
12 further kinds1314.20%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 528 of the 634 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 634 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 634 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zhitely_vrn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 634 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 96 posts held from the last 30 days (5.21%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 15:06 UTC342 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👀1custom 53751357225146855011

6 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC416 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Посмотрите на эти вечерние краски Шилово 😍 Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

❤‍🔥4😍1

6 Nov 2026, 14:27 UTC513 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Вообщееее 😍😍😍 Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

☃5

6 Nov 2026, 14:13 UTC603 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026

❗️У ДТК авария. Уже есть пробка, пока небольшая, проезд затруднен в сторону Малышево Будьте осторожны за рулем! Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

👀1

6 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC672 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Надо же какая красота. Но холодно, как бы в ночь не было мороза. • от подписчика • Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

🔥1🥰1

6 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC719 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Смотрите какой закатище был 5 лет назад • от подписчика • Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

❤6👀1🔥1custom 63258648212542611481

6 Nov 2026, 12:52 UTC795 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🥳 Наша новая школа впервые в жизни увидела снег 🥹 Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

🤯5❤2🦄2👀1🔥1😨1😱1🙊1

6 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC785 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👋 вот и всё! Пока пока первый снег 😁 Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

custom 63258648212542611483❤2☃1👍1

6 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC776 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

❄️ С первым снегом нас! Шилово! 😍 Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

😱4🔥3☃1

6 Nov 2026, 12:28 UTC770 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

😍 Какое небо сегодня Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

❤3🔥2🥰1

6 Nov 2026, 12:08 UTC791 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Ноябрьская радуга🌈 Жители Шилово ТГ✦МАХ✦ВК

❤‍🔥7😍2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 634 posts we hold for @zhitely_vrn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Воронеж VRN ️
@vrn36v · 70,212
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 August 2026
Мой и твой Воронеж
@mtv36 · 190,358
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 August 2026
Воронеж Сейчас
@voronezh1ru · 27,867
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Новости Воронежа и Области
@smi_voronezh · 208,692
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
Т-Воронеж | Типичный | Новости Воронежа
@typicalvoronezh · 374,008
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 August 2026
Большой воронежский
@voronezh_news_36 · 83,681
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
Тревожный Воронеж
@tre_voronezh · 51,832
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 25 August 2026
Жесть Воронеж
@zhest_voronezh_136 · 61,957
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
Регион-36 (Воронеж с огоньком)
@voronezh_r36 · 73,410
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Инцидент Воронеж
@vrinc · 64,309
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
МОЁ! Online. Воронеж
@moeonline · 38,037
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
ВОРОНЕЖ СЕГОДНЯ
@voronezh1 · 96,011
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
ВОРОНЕЖСКОЕ НЕБО
@nebovrn36 · 154,019
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 13 August 2026
МЧС Воронежской области
@mchs36 · 27,290
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 September 2026
Куда пойти в Воронеже | Афиша Воронежа
@go_vrn · 76,017
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Гусев
@gusev_36 · 130,401
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
Воронеж №1
@vrn01 · 72,867
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
TV Губерния. Воронеж
@tvgubernia · 20,292
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 September 2026
Блокнот Воронеж
@bloknot_vrn · 64,717
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
Типичный Воронеж | Настоящий
@Voronezh4 · 81,139
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жители Шилово (Воронеж)” (@zhitely_vrn), 18,161 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhitely_vrn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.