Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЖЧТ

Channel

ЖЧТ

@zhyolto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,085subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002316822629
TypeChannel
Username@zhyolto
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhyolto

Growth

1,0851,1171,1016 August 2026 — 1,113 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,113 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,114 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,117 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,113 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,111 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,107 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,102 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,091 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,090 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,087 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,085 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,080–1,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 02:161,085-2
1 Sept 2026, 18:441,087-3
29 Aug 2026, 09:061,090-1
25 Aug 2026, 23:171,091-11
23 Aug 2026, 09:441,102-5
20 Aug 2026, 04:281,107-4
16 Aug 2026, 21:031,111-2
13 Aug 2026, 06:071,113-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:211,117+3
6 Aug 2026, 21:231,114+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:061,113no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:181,113first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

300 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 538210073353968883924381.0%
custom 53841933704553175433812.7%
custom 5384324375547780122196.33%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,380 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔙💛 А помните первую победу «Волги» в прошлом сезоне? Злющий Каменщиков на острие, Мурза с шикарным голом из-за штрафной, работящий Воронин в подыгрыше, неуловимый Уридия, вышедший на замену… Но главным открытием матча против «СКА-Хабаровска» стал Владимир Шайхутдинов. Для молодого голкипера это был дебют в Первой Лиге. После неудачного старта команды, КиноВолька впервые вышел в основе — и сразу сыграл на ноль. Та

custom 538210073353968883912custom 53843243755477801222custom 53841933704553175431

4 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC333 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

3️⃣📊 Айдар Хабибуллин — лучший игрок матча против «Челябинска» 👍 — заслуженно @zhyolto

custom 538210073353968883914

3 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC365 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

❤️‍🔥🔥 Артур Мурза забил дебютный гол за «Велес» Да ещё как! Вышел на замену и мастерски вколотил победный мяч в ворота мощного «Ротора», за который играет ещё один бывший ульяновец — Михаил Умников. Благодаря этой победе «Велес» имеет в своём запасе 9 очков после 4 тура, что на 6 больше, чем у «Волги». Шикарный старт для новичка Первой Лиги! Пригодился бы Артур нам в этом сезоне? 🤔 @zhyolto

custom 538210073353968883922

3 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC358 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💛⚽️ Оценки игроков «Волги» за матч против «Челябинска» 👍 — согласен полностью 👎 — не согласен @zhyolto

custom 538210073353968883916

2 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC392 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 538210073353968883912custom 53841933704553175436custom 53843243755477801223

1 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC399 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📊 «Волга» и «Челябинск» — история встреч во Второй Лиге А и Первой Лиге Первому, кто угадает итоговый счёт завтрашней встречи, переведу денежку для похода на следующий домашний матч. Победитель может отказаться от выигрыша и я направлю его на благотворительность. Комментарии принимаются до стартового свистка и без редактирования! ✍️ @zhyolto

custom 53821007335396888391custom 53841933704553175431custom 53843243755477801221

1 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC386 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💛 Без шансов для остальных: Андрей Костин — игрок июля Опорный полузащитник уверенно выиграл голосование ульяновских болельщиков по итогам первого месяца сезона-2026/27. В трёх матчах Костин отметился голом и результативной передачей, против «Торпедо» был признан МВП встречи, а также набрал 75% голосов в опросе. Яркий старт сезона делает Андрея безоговорочным лидером команды по итогам июля. Поздравляем в комментар

custom 538419337045531754314custom 53821007335396888395

31 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC418 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Кто был лучшим в июле?

  1. 9️⃣📊 Андрей Костин76%
  2. 3️⃣📊 Айдар Хабибуллин22%
  3. 4️⃣📊 Камиль Ибрагимов18%
  4. 2️⃣📊 Данил Новиков9%
  5. 5️⃣📊 Александр Саплинов23%

The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC433 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❓ Определяем игрока месяца в ФК «Волга» Ульяновск По итогам июльских матчей определилась пятёрка футболистов, набравших самую высокую среднюю оценку. При составлении рейтинга учитывались только игроки, проведшие на поле не менее половины от общего количества возможных игровых минут. Теперь пришло время выбрать лучшего из лучших. Голосуйте в опросе ниже и определите героя месяца в составе 🔥 @zhyolto

29 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC462 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎖️ Лидеры «Волги» в матче против «Нефтехимика» Саплинов тащил атаку, Костин выжигал центр поля, Ибрагимов доминировал в обороне. Сверяемся со статистикой лидеров и их оценками за матч! @zhyolto

custom 53821007335396888396

28 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,310 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Поддержим Володю Шайхутдинова ⚡️ Бывший вратарь «Волги» Владимир Шайхутдинов вышел в финал конкурса на амбассадорство JOGEL — он вошёл в пятёрку претендентов на победу! Победитель получит комплект экипировки от бренда. И в нынешней ситуации эта поддержка будет особенно кстати: недавно на базе «Машук-КМВ», за который сейчас выступает Володя, произошёл крупный пожар. Шайхутдинов был одним из важных игроков того само

custom 53841933704553175438

27 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC511 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

7️⃣⚽️ Никитин — в топе правых полузащитников Первой Лиги По итогам трёх стартовых туров сезона-2026/27 Андрей Никитин вошёл в тройку лучших правых полузащитников Первой Лиги по версии РУСТАТ, заняв место среди лидеров чемпионата по среднему индексу. Новичок «Волги» ярко заявил о себе уже в третьем туре, забив дебютный мяч в ворота своего бывшего клуба — «Нефтехимика». Именно этот гол принёс ульяновцам первую победу

custom 538210073353968883926

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zhyolto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTCFinal Results128 voters

Кто был лучшим в июле?

  1. 9️⃣📊 Андрей Костин76%
  2. 3️⃣📊 Айдар Хабибуллин22%
  3. 4️⃣📊 Камиль Ибрагимов18%
  4. 2️⃣📊 Данил Новиков9%
  5. 5️⃣📊 Александр Саплинов23%

The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЖЧТ” (@zhyolto), 1,085 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhyolto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.