Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Журик🫶🏻

Channel

Журик🫶🏻

@zhyriklive

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40,956subscribers

-192 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002718531856
TypeChannel
Username@zhyriklive
DescriptionЖизнь Журика Кирилл Шанель🎒 По поводу сотрудничества/рекламы: @managerzhyrika ❗️ • tg: @banktokrot_AD • e-mail: [email protected] По рекламе: @sheikhto @Vladimirvvm_ceo @randi_agent2 INST:https://www.instagram.com/zhy.rik? TT: ZHYRIK TIK TOK
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhyriklive

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

39,600 average views per post against 40,956 subscribers — an engagement rate of 96.6%. Across the 8,445 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,996 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 21.2%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (4 August 2026 3 September 2026)
Posts measured24 of 24 published in the window (0 exact, 24 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled949,660
Mature posts only100.2% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers40,956 measured 2 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,445 channels · p10 2.53% · p25 5.05% · p50 10.5% · p75 21.2% · p90 35.7%
Position in cohort99.668th percentile · 9.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.015% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 3 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

40,95645,55743,256.57 August 2026 — 41,148 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,148 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,210 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,055 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,501 subscribers11 August 2026 — 45,557 subscribers12 August 2026 — 45,454 subscribers13 August 2026 — 45,503 subscribers14 August 2026 — 45,387 subscribers16 August 2026 — 45,230 subscribers17 August 2026 — 45,069 subscribers18 August 2026 — 44,782 subscribers20 August 2026 — 44,495 subscribers21 August 2026 — 44,305 subscribers22 August 2026 — 44,086 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,481 subscribers25 August 2026 — 43,045 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,757 subscribers27 August 2026 — 42,472 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,255 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,833 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,517 subscribers31 August 2026 — 41,215 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,062 subscribers2 September 2026 — 40,956 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 26 days, net -192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,266–46,247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 12:2540,956-106
1 Sept 2026, 13:0441,062-153
31 Aug 2026, 16:0641,215-302
30 Aug 2026, 17:1741,517-316
29 Aug 2026, 14:5641,833-422
28 Aug 2026, 13:0642,255-217
27 Aug 2026, 09:3442,472-285
26 Aug 2026, 07:5542,757-288
25 Aug 2026, 06:1443,045-436
24 Aug 2026, 08:3843,481-605
22 Aug 2026, 13:4644,086-219
21 Aug 2026, 02:2344,305-190
20 Aug 2026, 02:3344,495-287
18 Aug 2026, 23:3244,782-287
17 Aug 2026, 20:0445,069-161
16 Aug 2026, 16:2745,230-157
14 Aug 2026, 21:5845,387-116
13 Aug 2026, 11:2545,503+49
12 Aug 2026, 13:2445,454-103
11 Aug 2026, 10:0645,557first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
96.6%
avg views ÷ 40,956 subscribers
Avg views / post
39,600
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held33 (13 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total949,660
Reactions total37,669
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
153
Videos
40
Links
227

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 35s
Average length
3m 48s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

48,269 reactions across 33 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24,95751.7%
custom 533945560382573833611,14023.1%
💔4,8099.96%
❤‍🔥2,6295.45%
💋2,5505.28%
🤪8941.85%
🍓5351.11%
🦄4140.858%
🌭3410.706%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,269 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
493
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 33 we hold a reading for · 91%
Most on one post
49
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zhyriklive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC≈5,860 views116 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Avrrorka02Photo

🔥 Розыгрыш PlayStation 5 и 5 ЦИФРОВЫХ КОПИЙ GTA VI 😳 1 место — Sony PlayStation 5 + GTA VI 2-5 место — ЦИФРОВАЯ КОПИЯ GTA VI Для участия нужно всего-лишь: 1. Быть подписанным на TG каналы Avrrorka02 и cloudr 2. Быть подписанным на Twitch каналы Avrrorkar и cloudr777 2. Нажать кнопку «Участвовать» под этим постом Итоги подведем 27 сентября в 20:00 при помощи бота, который выберет рандомных победителей. Всем удачи!

89❤‍🔥13💋11🤪2🍓1

31 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC≈10,700 views167 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Блин, опять впн не работает... Знакомо?) А мне с этим впном нет🙃 📡 Обходки глушилок и белых списков 🌎 Разные локации 💻 Бесконечное количество устройств 🌐 Безлимит на трафик(обходки тоже безлимит) 💛 SAVE VPN — ЛУЧШИЙ ВПН! Попробуй бесплатно👇

120💋18🦄14❤‍🔥8🍓4🌭2🤪1

28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC≈16,200 views259 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС СТРИМ В ТИК-ТОКЕ😛 Давайте посидим поболтаем , будем всех наказывать в батлах и подыматься вместе в ЛИГУ! Мне вы очень важны , давайте просто поговорим по душам) Нужна ваша поддержка! ГАЗ! Мы врываемсяяяя

208❤‍🔥24🍓17🦄6🌭2💋2

24 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC≈25,100 views1,390 reactions27 Starsread 3 September 2026

Люблю вас , спасибо вам большое, просто захотелось это сказать) Вы мне как семья 🧩

1,020❤‍🔥162💋147🦄21🤪16🍓11🌭7💔6

24 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈26,300 views332 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔥NEONFESTMINSK X ЖУРИК 🔥 30 АВГУСТА встречаемся на главной тусовке — NEONFESTMINSK X ЖУРИК! Наш специальный приглашённый гость — ЖУРИК 🖤 Весь вечер он будет вместе с нами: музыка, атмосфера, движ и максимум эмоций! 📸 А после мероприятия — самое интересное! Каждый сможет сфоткаться с ЖУРИКОМ и снять вместе с ним свой ТИК ТОК! 🔥 📅 30 АВГУСТА 📍375 PLACE 🏠 Машерова, 11 Собирай друзей и залетай — такое нельзя пропустить!

269❤‍🔥22💋21🍓8🤪5🌭3🦄3💔1

23 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC≈22,100 views572 reactions7 Starsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

391🤪81❤‍🔥38💋19🌭16💔12🦄8🍓7

23 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈23,200 views760 reactions23 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Нужны ли вам мои стримы? Сейчас рассуждаем о проведении стримов. Нравятся ли они вам? Потому что время, нервы и переживания, которые я трачу на стримы, никак не окупаются. Я устал не от стримов, а от переживаний.

603❤‍🔥75💋48🍓10🤪9💔7🌭4🦄4

18 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC≈34,700 views2,075 reactions25 Starsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1,480❤‍🔥258💋230🤪42🍓30🦄18🌭17

14 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈52,200 views3,208 reactions45 Starsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2,270💋373❤‍🔥281🤪170🍓48🌭22💔22🦄22

13 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈47,400 views1,092 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

РОВНО ЧЕРЕЗ 5 МИНУТ СТРИМ НА ТВИЧЕ 📺 https://www.twitch.tv/zhyrik1 Я пригласил Гоар к себе домой!

846❤‍🔥103🤪75🍓22💋20🦄12🌭8💔6

12 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC≈39,900 views907 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026

ХОТИТЕ КОЛАБУ С БУСТЕРОМ? https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4KfgpxF/ Газ все заспамим коментами «ГОУ КОЛАБУ С ЖУРИКОМ» Все кто сделает тот легенда , очень люблю вас , у нас получится.

686❤‍🔥69🦄53🤪33🍓25💋16💔13🌭12

10 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈57,000 views3,309 reactions14 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ГОАР ОТВЕТИЛА! Вчера она мне ответила таким сообщением… Ну всё , я потерян а так же потеряны деньги , переживания , переживания моей семьи и время. Что делать? Слов нету.

1,950💔970💋173🤪75❤‍🔥56🍓32🌭30🦄23

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @zhyriklive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Журик🫶🏻” (@zhyriklive), 40,956 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhyriklive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.