Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for фронтиспис циферблат🔗📃 | ziferblat

Channel

фронтиспис циферблат🔗📃 | ziferblat

@ziferblatinfo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

3,862subscribers

-121 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002014681836
TypeChannel
Username@ziferblatinfo
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ziferblatinfo

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,8624,0303,9469 August 2026 — 3,983 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,030 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,994 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,981 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,969 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,955 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,942 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,931 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,918 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,901 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,879 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,875 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,862 subscribers9 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,837–4,055 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:413,862-13
14 Sept 2026, 13:203,875-4
11 Sept 2026, 10:393,879-22
6 Sept 2026, 09:193,901-17
2 Sept 2026, 05:163,918-13
30 Aug 2026, 00:283,931-11
26 Aug 2026, 19:543,942-13
23 Aug 2026, 12:153,955-14
19 Aug 2026, 18:443,969-12
16 Aug 2026, 16:383,981-13
13 Aug 2026, 06:083,994-36
10 Aug 2026, 11:014,030+47
9 Aug 2026, 16:163,983first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

582 reactions across 7 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤35661.2%
💘406.87%
🎉386.53%
❤‍🔥356.01%
custom 5472296416850242361345.84%
custom 5303282495905620342223.78%
🥰183.09%
💋71.20%
⚡61.03%
🍓50.859%
🔥50.859%
😍40.687%
🦄40.687%
🆒30.515%
🕊20.344%
😭10.172%
🤗10.172%
🤩10.172%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 582 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC636 views105 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💗 Фото з виступу на Summer Anime & Cosplay Fest #концерти #світлини | photo by pevpper

❤70❤‍🔥12custom 53032824959056203429💋4🍓2💘2😍2🕊1

Signed Yulia

8 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC715 views76 reactionsread 9 August 2026

‼️Завтра останній день конкурсу! Роботи приймаються до 00:00. Тому якщо ви хочете взяти участь у конкурсі, то покваптесь! Умови та правила можна прочитати в цьому пості ⛧ 10 серпня відбудеться голосування за відео. Плануємо брати на нього 10 відео, але в разі чого їх може бути менше. Оголошення результатів відбудеться 11 серпня 🏆 #admin

❤33custom 547229641685024236127🥰6custom 53032824959056203424❤‍🔥2🍓1💘1🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC732 views68 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Дякуємо усім, хто був на вчорашнього стрім паті з Кирилом! Запис вже доступний в Stationhead, ви можете також послухати розмову без преміума, але щоб чути музику - він потрібен. 🔗Посилання на нього Особливо дякуємо Кирилу Черкашину, що погодився з нами поговорити і комбайн, яка організувала та провела це стрім паті💗 #стрімінг

❤52💘8❤‍🔥3🍓2💋1custom 53032824959056203421custom 54722964168502423611

7 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC723 views54 reactionsread 9 August 2026

📌 Стрім паті почалось! Заходьте слухати Кирила та класну музику ❤️

❤38❤‍🔥7💘6🆒1custom 53032824959056203421custom 54722964168502423611

Signed Yulia

7 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC758 views81 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🌟 Сьогодні відбудеться стрім паті інтерв'ю з Кирилом Черкашином (kyryll_ch)! ⛧ 19:30 в застосунку Stationhead Кирило буде відповідати на ваші запитання та ми разом послухаємо його пісні ‼️Що таке стрім паті та інформація як зареєструватись в застосунку є в цьому пості. Посилання незмінне, але ми продублюємо його о 19:30 #стрімінг

🎉38❤26❤‍🔥5💘4custom 53032824959056203424💋1🔥1🤗1

1 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈1,380 views113 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💫 Фото з виступу на Summer Anime & Cosplay Fest (частина 2) #концерти #світлини | photo bySunl1me

❤78🥰12💘10❤‍🔥3🔥2😍2custom 53032824959056203422🕊1

Signed Yulia

1 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈1,080 views85 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💫 Фото з виступу на Summer Anime & Cosplay Fest #концерти #світлини | photo by Sunl1me (1-4, 7-9), natasepticeye (5-6)

❤59💘9⚡6❤‍🔥3🦄2custom 54722964168502423612💋1🔥1

Signed Yulia

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @ziferblatinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

schmalgauzen
@schmalgauzen · 24,024
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Ziferblat (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…«Ziferblat»{{Cite web|title=Сторінка офіційного фан-клубу гурту|url=https://t.me/ziferblatinfo/207|accessdate=2025-01-12}}. == Синопсис альбомів ==…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“фронтиспис циферблат🔗📃 | ziferblat” (@ziferblatinfo), 3,862 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ziferblatinfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.