Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for زیست برتر •غیاثی•

Channel

زیست برتر •غیاثی•

@zisttestghiassi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

12,002subscribers

-198 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001001264089
TypeChannel
Username@zisttestghiassi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zisttestghiassi

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

15.4 average views per post against 12,002 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.128%. Across the 6,289 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.86% and 13.4%, with a median of 6.65%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 24 September 2026)
Posts measured109 of 111 published in the window (109 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,675
Mature posts only0.148% over 65 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers12,002 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 6,289 channels · p10 1.20% · p25 2.86% · p50 6.65% · p75 13.4% · p90 22.2%
Position in cohort0.620th percentile · 1/53 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.241% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,00212,20012,1015 August 2026 — 12,200 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,200 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,186 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,184 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,179 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,172 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,171 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,166 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,156 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,152 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,148 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,143 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,137 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,135 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,133 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,127 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,120 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,116 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,103 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,097 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,091 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,089 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,087 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,081 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,075 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,072 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,066 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,054 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,036 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,023 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,014 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,010 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,002 subscribers5 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -198. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,972–12,230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:5812,002-8
15 Sept 2026, 18:2112,010-4
14 Sept 2026, 03:2112,014-9
12 Sept 2026, 14:0012,023-13
10 Sept 2026, 11:3612,036-18
7 Sept 2026, 10:2112,054-12
4 Sept 2026, 13:2112,066-6
3 Sept 2026, 01:2412,072-3
2 Sept 2026, 00:5212,075-6
1 Sept 2026, 00:3812,081-6
31 Aug 2026, 01:4312,087-2
29 Aug 2026, 23:5412,089-2
28 Aug 2026, 23:0612,091-6
28 Aug 2026, 00:5412,097-6
27 Aug 2026, 03:0212,103-4
26 Aug 2026, 05:5312,107-9
25 Aug 2026, 04:2612,116-4
24 Aug 2026, 02:3412,120-7
22 Aug 2026, 11:5312,127-6
21 Aug 2026, 04:5412,133first reading

Engagement

292 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.125%
avg views ÷ 12,002 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.0
98 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 292 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held292 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total1,466
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6h 55m
Average length
3m 51s

Measured directly from 108 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
770.0%
❤‍🔥110.0%
👍110.0%
😍110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 292 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 292 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC3 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

#آموزش و حل تست زیست #استادغیاثی #بصورت کاملا مفهومی.. #روش های تست زنی زیر سی ثانیه #بهترین مدرس ژنتیک کشوری ﷼جمع بندی زیست حضوری و آنلاین #رمزیست .برای مشاوره و ثبت نام کلاس های زیست پیامک به شماره 09149285452 @Alighiassizist

1

2 Sept 2026, 16:04 UTC5 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

جزوه طلایی زیست یازدهم #آموزش و حل تست زیست #استادغیاثی #بصورت کاملا مفهومی.. #روش های تست زنی زیر سی ثانیه #بهترین مدرس ژنتیک کشوری ﷼جمع بندی زیست حضوری و آنلاین #رمزیست .برای مشاوره و ثبت نام کلاس های زیست پیامک به شماره 09149285452 @Alighiassizist

1

2 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC12 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

جدیدترین شعر استاد غیاثی

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 292 posts we hold for @zisttestghiassi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“زیست برتر •غیاثی•” (@zisttestghiassi), 12,002 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zisttestghiassi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.