Channel
@ziyaeifar_official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002369862923 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ziyaeifar_official |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ziyaeifar_official |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 199 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 204 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:06 | 205 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 207 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:40 | 209 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 209 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 75.0% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 13.6% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 6.82% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️آقایون قوهقضائیه و نهادهای امنیتی! اقدامات شما بازدارنده نبوده، وگرنه این تروریستها اینقدر جسور نمیشدن که یه جوان بیگناه رو سلاخی کنن و بعدش عکس و فیلمش رو بذارن تو رسانههاشون! والله که اگه با این وحوش برخورد نکنید، خون این شهدا تا ابد یقهتون رو ول نمی کنه. #حمیدرضا_رجب_زاده @ziyaeifar_official
❤7
‼️#مهم 🔺 به گفته برخی شاهدان ، دیشب در محله علایین شهر ری تعدادی موتورسوار نقابدار با چماق، شیشه خودروهای ساکنین این محله را تخریب کردند. 🔻 از طرفی خبر شهادت حمیدرضا رجبزاده، مداح جوان، پس از شکنجه و تکهتکه کردن توسط تروریست های سلطنت طلب در فضای مجازی منتشر شد. به احتمال زیاد ضد انقلاب و تروریست های سلطنت طلب برنامه جدیدی برای متشنج کردن فضای عمومی کشور طی روز ها و ماه های آینده دارند! @ziyaeifar_official
❤3
اونایی الان دارن برای خزر اشک تمساح می ریزن که تا همین چند وقت پیش داشتن برای ورود آمریکایی ها به جنوب تولید محتوا می کردن و از عمو ترامپ بابت کمک تشکر می کردن!! وقیح تر از شما نیست آب و صابون بیارید روتون رو بشوریم!!! @ziyaeifar_official
👌2💯1
دریا خزر که سر جاشه ولی عقل شما هیچ وقت سر جاش نبوده و نیست هیچ درکی از شرایط حال کشور ندارید برده های موج های رسانه ای هستید..! #مغز_های_کوچک_زنگ_زده @ziyaeifar_official
👌4💯1
چشمم به قبرِ باعظمتش که افتاد، اشکم بیاختیار جاری شد مگه میشه کوه رو توی یه قبرِ کوچیک جا داد؟ زیر لب با خودم زمزمه میکردم: آقاجون! شرمندهام که نشد تو کوچهپسکوچههای تهران، فدات بشم شرمندهام که پیشمرگت نشدم و سربازِ لایقی برات نبودم... حلال کن، آقا سیدعلی! یاد حرف سید مصطفی موسوی افتادم که میگفت: «آقا، این قبر رو کوچیک کندین! ۹۰ میلیون آدم که اینجا جا نمیشه؛ قربونتون برم، خسیسبازی درنیارید! بزرگش کنید...…
💔6
کاش به جای همه اون خوانندههایی که با پول بیتالمال سیر شدن و آخرش به کشور خودشون لگد زدن، چندتا #محسن_چاووشی داشتیم تو این مملکت...! تو این مارپیچ سکوت و خفقانی که از طرف وحوش سلطنتطلب در فضای رسانه ایجاد شده، حرف از اعتقاد زدن و پای این اعتقادات موندن، خودش یه جور جهاد محسوب میشه! @ziyaeifar_official
❤1
💢توهین سلطنتطلبها به اهل بیت و امام حسین، هرچند ذرهای از جایگاه آنها نمیکاهد، اما بهخوبی ماهیت این جریان را نشان میدهد که فردای جمهوری اسلامی، با هیچ عقیده مخالفی مدارا نخواهند کرد. تنفس بیشتر عاشقان یزید در نهایت به ضرر مردم تمام میشود. بیچاره اند کسانی که قدرت تفکر خودشان را به دست این جماعت سپرده اند. ✍🏼کاظم ضیائی فر @ziyaeifar_official
❤2
🔻در آستانه هر درگیری نظامی گسترده، همزمان با آمادهسازی نهایی نیروها و توزیع بانک اهداف توسط طرفین، تلاشهای دیپلماتیک نیز به اوج خود میرسد. شب گذشته، بعد از تهدید های ترامپ میانجیها (بهویژه عاصم منیر، عبدالرحمن و فیدان) پیشنهاد جدیدی را بهعنوان آخرین راهکار آمریکا پیش از حمله مطرح کردند و ۴۸ ساعت برای بررسی آن فرصت داده شده است. 🔻از منظر تحلیلی، تکرار تهدید علیه تأسیسات انرژی ایران، نهتنها علیه تهران، بلکه هش…
❤3
گفته بودم چو بیایی غم دل با تو بگویم چه بگویم که غم از دل برود چون تو بیایی… و سر انجام ما در بیکرانگیِ این جهان، به نخِ نامرئیِ تقدیر الهی گره خوردیم تا داستانمان را در آغوشِ امنِ او ادامه دهیم...! ۱۴۰۵/۰۳/۲۱💍 @ziyaeifar_official
❤34👏2
رستم و سهراب افسانه نبودن، ما با چشمان خود پهلوانی سرداران مان را در میدان دیدیم…! @ziyaeifar_official
❤5
💢کاش غیرتی که ترامپ روی یه بالگرد داشت بعضی ها روی خون رهبر شهید و هم وطناشون داشتند!! @ziyaeifar_official
👌6❤3
♦️تصویر کمتر دیده شده از آیت الله سید مجتبی حسینی خامنهای ( قدسه الله نفس الزکیه ) رهبر معظم انقلاب. @ziyaeifar_official
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ziyaeifar_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کاظم ضیائی فر” (@ziyaeifar_official), 199 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ziyaeifar_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.