自! 由!
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
Channel
@ziyao233channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,156subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001570578195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ziyao233channel |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ziyao233channel |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 1,156 | +8 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 1,148 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 1,145 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 1,147 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 1,150 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 1,142 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 1,144 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 1,143 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 1,151 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 1,144 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 1,141 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 1,140 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 1,141 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 1,140 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 1,140 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
90 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 26 | 28.9% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 25.6% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 13.3% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 10.0% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 10.0% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 5.56% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
自! 由!
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
https://www.phoronix.com/news/AMD-openSIL-Phoenix-AM5-PR
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
15 年前的机器叫电子垃圾, 50 年前的叫文物
😁15
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
FFmpeg 9.0版本刚发布了。这个版本的代号是“Lei” 按照惯例,“Lei” 应该是哪个计算机科学家/数学家,可想了好久也对不起来这是谁。 查了一下FFmpeg的开发邮件列表,才发现原来是纪念已故的@雷霄骅 [蜡烛]。 他在 2013–2016 年间撰写了大量 FFmpeg API、源码分析及音视频编解码、封装和传输协议方面的中文教程与示例,帮助许多中国开发者入门音视频和 FFmpeg。于 2016 年疑似因过劳突然离世。 今年是离世10周年,FFmpeg用了这个大版本号来纪念他。 ▎Source
🙏26😢3✍1
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 18:29:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <[email protected]> To: lua-l <[email protected]> Subject: [ANN] Lua 5.5.1 now available [-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: multipart/alternative, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 3.5K --] Lua 5.5.1 has been frozen and is now the current release of Lua 5.5. Lua 5.5.1 fixes all bugs listed in https://www.lua.org/bugs.html#5.5.0 Lua 5.5.1 is a…
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
打开 memtest.org ,立刻 PASS[1]。 [1]: PASS 仅为对内存与控制器状态的描述,取决于您的设备,也可能 FAIL。
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
我双 PASS 了.webp
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
我觉得我已经成了无情的 pick and place 机器
❤1
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
bilibili.com/BV1henFzQESV 笑死我了
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ 修了下文章中提到的基线问题, 感觉维护者会绷不住
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
决定了, 我明年要打苦痛之路速通
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
就是笔记本 hjkl 四个键寿命堪忧了
Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ziyao233channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ziyao Channel | 二代目” (@ziyao233channel), 1,156 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ziyao233channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.