我到底该点还是不该点……
🤣3

Channel
@ziyueintele
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
313subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001359336681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ziyueintele |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ziyueintele |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 313 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 311 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 313 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 311 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 315 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 315 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
46 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 25 | 54.3% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 21.7% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 10.9% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
我到底该点还是不该点……
🤣3
New Orleans来玩的学妹送了一罐Coffee and Chicory,但我自己从来没有喝咖啡的习惯,纽约有没有想要的朋友?免费送
挑战全美最贵电费:176度电将近$100,合$0.52一度 这tmd比湾区特斯拉超充还贵
😁3
Photo, posted without a caption
😁4
决定单开一个栏目记录一下在🇺🇸受到的价格震撼 如果我的经济学原理是在美国学的,估计成绩要好很多吧,真就供求决定价格啊,谁说劳动决定价格了? #今日美国离谱物价
🥰5
New York驾照也换到手了,毕业了 美国车管所拍照真的丑,加拿大拍完至少还给你看一下
👍1
刚发现喝了3天的豆奶原来是咖啡伴侣……我说怎么这么好喝……
😁8🤣2
在地铁上笑成傻逼
“好的导师,我知道怎么做了” 中国社会科学院人工智能辅助科研基本规范(试行) https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/u1ytft99mpQIDedAB6bMuA
😁2
实在不理解网上那些开箱博主为什么会那么兴奋不已。我们低能量人士光是从楼下把快递抱上来就已经费劲了力气,一想到打开后还要收拾整理一番给它腾地方,真是完全不想动。 都ai时代了,快递就不能到了家里自己从箱子里跳出来再给自己收纳好么🌚
😁6🤪2
这一天还是来了:https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-science-ai-workbench
🔥1
如何选择国产仿制药 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/isbvJhHOUyDQgeVCgNiR5A
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ziyueintele. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“瞎说什么” (@ziyueintele), 313 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ziyueintele.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.