Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Злхвс

Channel

Злхвс

@zlxws_com

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

109subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001833147796
TypeChannel
Username@zlxws_com
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zlxws_com

Growth

1071091087 August 2026 — 107 subscribers9 August 2026 — 107 subscribers6 September 2026 — 109 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 30 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 09:00109+2
9 Aug 2026, 08:17107no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:01107first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5843.6%
❤‍🔥2518.8%
🔥1511.3%
👀139.77%
💯96.77%
😱86.02%
💘32.26%
👍21.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zlxws_com. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC33 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Дело нескольких минут — slem

2

31 Jul 2026, 05:03 UTC50 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ne1spravnostVideo

неисправность – неприлично Музыка: Марк Калинин, Роман Степаненко, Феодора Морозова Слова: Феодора Морозова Обложка: София Вагнер СЛУШАТЬ НА ВСЕХ ПЛОЩАДКАХ

2🔥2❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC45 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @everydayrainPhoto

Три дня дождя — Не смотри наверх слушать везде: https://band.link/ne_smotri_naverh концерты: https://everydayrain.com

2🔥2❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC67 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Есть идеи кого еще нарисовать?

2❤‍🔥1👍1

28 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC126 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4RaUCh5/ Как я давно такие видосы не делала..

❤‍🔥7💯2🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC81 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ASYAMERKULOVA1Poll

какой вариант облоги на трек лучше?

  1. с надписью72%
  2. без надписи32%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

💯43

25 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC74 viewsread 9 August 2026

Какой вариант вам больше нравится? 👀

25 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC77 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ASYAMERKULOVA1Photo

йоу, чат, мы выбираем облогу на новый трек. есть два таких варианта: с надписью и без как по вашему мнению лучше?

👀43

20 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC103 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В перерывах между работой и рисованием, я впала в некий ступор. Пропало вдохновение, настрой, я была в странной мысленной пустоте. Вы знаете, что я беру вдохновение с музыки. Переслушивая разные треки мне ничего не приходило в голову, не было какого-то видения картины, поэтому я попробовала сменить тактику. Попыталась передать эмоции через музыку. И как вы можете наблюдать, мне захотелось этим поделиться. Сразу говор

8💘3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zlxws_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTCAnonymous Poll147 voters

какой вариант облоги на трек лучше?

  1. с надписью72%
  2. без надписи32%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Злхвс” (@zlxws_com), 109 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zlxws_com.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.