Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Знак качества

Channel

Знак качества

@znak_kachestva_rus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

105,316subscribers

-1,581 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001962199988
TypeChannel
Username@znak_kachestva_rus
DescriptionСообщество о качественных продуктах, и их влиянию на наше здоровье и внешний вид Реклама: @Telespace_pr Мы на бирже: https://telega.in/c/+cQz7LqVFgvQ1YTgy app.telepush.ru/telegram/znak_kachestva_rus/cV0I Менеджер: @Spiral_Miya РКН: https://rkn.link/ZjZ
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/znak_kachestva_rus

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

105,316106,897106,106.57 August 2026 — 106,897 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,897 subscribers8 August 2026 — 106,863 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106,825 subscribers10 August 2026 — 106,785 subscribers11 August 2026 — 106,755 subscribers12 August 2026 — 106,714 subscribers13 August 2026 — 106,670 subscribers15 August 2026 — 106,634 subscribers16 August 2026 — 106,580 subscribers17 August 2026 — 106,540 subscribers18 August 2026 — 106,504 subscribers20 August 2026 — 106,475 subscribers21 August 2026 — 106,446 subscribers22 August 2026 — 106,403 subscribers24 August 2026 — 106,362 subscribers25 August 2026 — 106,339 subscribers26 August 2026 — 106,303 subscribers27 August 2026 — 106,272 subscribers28 August 2026 — 106,237 subscribers29 August 2026 — 106,202 subscribers30 August 2026 — 106,177 subscribers31 August 2026 — 106,148 subscribers1 September 2026 — 106,109 subscribers2 September 2026 — 106,080 subscribers3 September 2026 — 106,039 subscribers5 September 2026 — 105,998 subscribers9 September 2026 — 105,883 subscribers11 September 2026 — 105,809 subscribers13 September 2026 — 105,738 subscribers15 September 2026 — 105,685 subscribers17 September 2026 — 105,614 subscribers19 September 2026 — 105,537 subscribers26 September 2026 — 105,316 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1,581. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105,079–107,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 20:37105,316-221
19 Sept 2026, 17:58105,537-77
17 Sept 2026, 03:16105,614-71
15 Sept 2026, 05:01105,685-53
13 Sept 2026, 11:01105,738-71
11 Sept 2026, 15:56105,809-74
9 Sept 2026, 02:00105,883-115
5 Sept 2026, 17:38105,998-41
3 Sept 2026, 16:58106,039-41
2 Sept 2026, 08:04106,080-29
1 Sept 2026, 05:17106,109-39
31 Aug 2026, 05:03106,148-29
30 Aug 2026, 04:56106,177-25
29 Aug 2026, 07:25106,202-35
28 Aug 2026, 08:36106,237-35
27 Aug 2026, 05:28106,272-31
26 Aug 2026, 04:44106,303-36
25 Aug 2026, 07:26106,339-23
24 Aug 2026, 08:44106,362-41
22 Aug 2026, 13:44106,403first reading

Engagement

120 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.23%
avg views ÷ 105,316 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,500
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 120 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held120 (30 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total346,760
Reactions total4,797
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 22:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,120
Videos
≈1,080
Links
≈2,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 57s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,152 reactions across 120 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤯5,85357.7%
❤1,66516.4%
😁1,45814.4%
👍7917.79%
🔥2382.34%
👏1000.985%
🥰360.355%
custom 5372888032984721571110.108%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,000 views16 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Маркетологи нам врали! (Опять) 🤬 Бады для сна - пустышка! Мелатонин, магний и CBD-масла снова красиво продают как «спасение от бессонницы», но врачи всё чаще говорят, что толку почти ноль. ❌ Мелатонин в добавках иногда даёт настолько слабый эффект, что человек засыпает всего на минуту раньше. ❌ Магний работает только в узких ситуациях: например, когда сон ломают мышечное напряжение или судороги. ❌ А по CBD-маслам…

👍9❤4🤯2😁1

26 Sept 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,850 views20 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🧴 Антисептик может навредить сильнее, чем кажется Льёте его на руки по десять раз в день "для безопасности"? У кожи на этот счёт другое мнение. 🔴Спирт - при частом использовании сушит кожу, разрушает защитный барьер и провоцирует трещины. 🔴Отдушки и консерванты - могут вызывать раздражение и контактный дерматит. 🔴Антисептик на повреждённой коже - жжение может быть не единственной проблемой: раздражение и сухость …

👍15❤3🔥1🤯1

25 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC≈2,810 views94 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

И влажные салфетки могут ВРЕДИТЬ ❗️ ❌ Один из опасных компонентов — метилизотиазолинон, предотвращающий рост бактерий и грибков. Он может вызывать аллергии, особенно у детей и людей с чувствительной кожей, а при постоянном использовании — сыпь и дерматит. ❌ Также есть феноксиэтанол, тоже способный вызвать аллергию, раздражение кожи и глаз, а в тяжелых случаях даже привести к экземе. Кто регулярно использует влажн…

🤯53❤39👍2

25 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC≈2,800 views5 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

Виктория Боня призналась, что вместо оригинала носит реплики брендов – Если вы думаете, что покупая брендовые шмотки с витрины ЦУМа получаете качество, то сильно ошибаетесь По словам блогерши, в Китае давно шьют на 70% дешевле, не уступая в качеству оригиналу, а для примера показала каналы сети Lux Atelier. Они привозят реплики, которые шьются по тем же лекалам, что и оригинал – так зачем платить больше? От Herme…

😁4❤1

25 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC≈2,900 views34 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Lay’s Паприка - это вообще не паприка 🤮 В составе глутамат + усилители вкуса, сахар, ароматизаторы. Реальной паприки - минимум, вкус собирают химией. ❗️ Дальше, кислоты и добавки могут давать жжение в желудке, вызывать жажду и раздражение слизистой. И бонус: следы рыбы, сои, горчицы — привет аллергикам 😉 😉 Знак качества

🤯29👍2🥰2❤1

24 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC≈3,510 views53 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

☕️ Растворимый кофе оказался не таким безобидным, как кажется Сам по себе растворимый кофе не «яд», но нюансы есть. В нём может быть больше акриламида, чем в обычном заварном кофе - это вещество образуется при сильной термической обработке. Если пить много - кофеин может добавить тревожность, учащённое сердцебиение и проблемы со сном. А отдельная история - кофе «3 в 1». Помимо кофе там обычно есть сахар, ароматиза…

🤯34👍11🔥6❤2

24 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC≈3,220 views10 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🫣 Простояла вчера 40 минут в очереди на заправку из-за этих перебоев с бензином. В соседней машине девушка тоже скучала, разговорились через окно. Я сделала комплимент ее новенькой сумке “Kelly” от Hermes — выглядит просто роскошно 😍 Пошутила, мол, с такими ценами на 95-й бензин на оригинальные сумки скоро придется брать ипотеку. А она смеется: «Так это и не оригинал. Кто в здравом уме сейчас отдает миллионы бутика…

🤯7❤3

24 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC≈3,400 views165 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Омега-3 назвали переоценённой добавкой 😳 Новые данные показывают, что для большинства здоровых людей эффект от капсул оказался намного слабее, чем считалось раньше. Польза часто была связана не с самими добавками, а с образом жизни людей, которые регулярно едят рыбу, следят за питанием и в целом заботятся о здоровье. Вы принимаете Омега-3? ❤️ — да 🤯 — нет... 😉 Знак качества

❤82🤯82😁1

23 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC≈4,010 views119 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

"Алёнка" уже перешагнула отметку в 300 рублей 😱 Цена обычной плитки шоколада пробила 370 рублей. Ещё немного - и к чаю будем брать её не в сладком отделе, а по особому случаю. 😉 Знак качества

🤯91😁20❤5👏3

23 Sept 2026, 08:43 UTC≈4,160 views60 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

❌ Бутылка, из которой вы пьёте каждый день, может превратиться в рассадник бактерий Одноразовый пластик не рассчитан на месяцы использования. Со временем появляются царапины и микротрещины, которые сложнее нормально промыть — там могут сохраняться и размножаться бактерии. Особенно пора менять бутылку, если она помутнела, поцарапалась, пахнет пластиком или долго находилась на солнце. 😉 Знак качества

🤯33👍17❤7🔥3

22 Sept 2026, 17:59 UTC≈4,220 views83 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Наггетсы "Мираторг" без сои оказались с соей 🤬 На упаковке производитель заявляет "без сои", но в составе указаны соевые пищевые волокна и изолированный соевый белок. Соя - распространённый аллерген, способный вызвать серьёзную реакцию у чувствительных людей. Поэтому такая маркировка может быть опасно вводящей в заблуждение. 😉 Знак качества

🤯62😁12custom 53728880329847215715❤2👏2

22 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC≈4,070 views11 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

Сидела в кафе, услышала разговор двух сотрудниц Золотого Яблока... 🤦🏻‍♀️ Они обсуждали, как дурят народ на распродажах. Типа клеят желтый ценник, а цена всё равно выше закупа в 5 раз. И одна другой говорит: «Я себе вообще всё в Квине беру, нафиг мне наша скидка сотрудника, там всё равно дороже». Я не поленилась, 2 часа копалась и отрыла этот Квин. Оказалось, так магазин называется — PARFUM QUEEN Ребята, это разно…

😁9🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @znak_kachestva_rus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@znak_kachestva_rus edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Знак качества” (@znak_kachestva_rus), 105,316 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/znak_kachestva_rus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.