Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zombie Tarot

Channel

Zombie Tarot

@zombie_tarot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,562subscribers

-238 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001506101002
TypeChannel
Username@zombie_tarot
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zombie_tarot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,56218,80018,6817 August 2026 — 18,800 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,798 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,792 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,777 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,767 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,773 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,780 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,763 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,761 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,759 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,765 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,763 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,764 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,765 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,768 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,767 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,764 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,759 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,742 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,728 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,694 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,686 subscribers6 September 2026 — 18,665 subscribers10 September 2026 — 18,644 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,621 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,592 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,568 subscribers18 September 2026 — 18,562 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 41 days, net -238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,526–18,836 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:5918,562-6
15 Sept 2026, 19:3718,568-24
14 Sept 2026, 04:0018,592-29
12 Sept 2026, 08:5718,621-23
10 Sept 2026, 03:4218,644-21
6 Sept 2026, 22:0118,665-21
4 Sept 2026, 09:5718,686-8
2 Sept 2026, 23:1618,694-34
1 Sept 2026, 17:3818,728-14
31 Aug 2026, 17:4818,742-17
30 Aug 2026, 17:3818,759-5
29 Aug 2026, 16:2418,764-3
26 Aug 2026, 19:5318,767-1
25 Aug 2026, 16:4218,768+3
24 Aug 2026, 15:2418,765+1
22 Aug 2026, 21:1918,764+1
21 Aug 2026, 13:0818,763-2
20 Aug 2026, 11:2618,765+6
19 Aug 2026, 13:0518,759-2
18 Aug 2026, 15:3418,761first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 26 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 18,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held21 (26 April 20261 September 2026)
Views total2,240
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 00m
Average length
22m 36s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,584 reactions across 21 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,67546.7%
🔥84923.7%
❤‍🔥41911.7%
🎉1143.18%
😁1123.13%
🥰932.59%
💘722.01%
👍511.42%
💋451.26%
💯280.781%
👏240.67%
🍓220.614%
🤣220.614%
🦄220.614%
😈160.446%
🐳50.14%
🕊50.14%
💅30.084%
🏆20.056%
😇20.056%
2 further kinds30.084%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,584 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC≈2,240 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

❌👤 Как читать карты, на которых нет людей Сегодня наши подзадержавшиеся "мудрости" приурочены к началу учебного года! Поучу вас немного и я. На этот выпуск меня вдохновил недавний коммент: Интересно узнать как правильно трактовать, например, чувства человека или мысли, или действия, или желания, когда выпадает аркан без персонажа, например, 8 Жезлов. Расскажу, как же читать карты, на которых нет людей (а я таких

45❤‍🔥12💋8👍3🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈5,310 views155 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

🌀 Как читать карты на позиции "ПЕРСПЕКТИВА" Сегодня у нас не просто "мудрость", а прям целая ПРЕМУДРОСТЬ. В этой 30-минутной лекции я расскажу, как же читать карты на позиции перспективы в раскладе. Это одна из самых гадких и непонятных позиций, и с ней всегда возникают проблемы. 🌎 Тема настолько обширная, что я не уверена, что смогла в полной мере её объяснить даже в таком большом подкасте. Но для старта вам хв

102🔥28💋11❤‍🔥9🦄3💘1🥰1

9 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈6,590 views132 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

❓📝 Как составить расклад при максимально абстрактной предыстории Сегодня у нас супер-выпуск "мудростей"! Посвятила я его нашей вечно-любимой и самой проблемной теме - составлению вопросов к раскладам. Представим, что пришла к нам клиентка: Аня, 19 лет. Живет со своей семьей в Польше. Хочет переехать в Барселону и там учиться в университете на морского эколога. Родители относятся к этому ее желанию крайне неодноз

❤‍🔥56🔥4224💋4🦄3🙏2💘1

21 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC≈7,820 views225 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

#неизданное Пару лет лежал этот видос в закромах, но так мы его и не выложили. Даже не знаю, почему 🤷🏼‍♀️ Сегодня наткнулась на него и решила поделиться с вами здесь :) В нëм вы узнаете, как НЕ надо трактовать карту Шут. Всем хорошего настроения! ☀️

😁10763🤣17💘16🔥11❤‍🔥5💋5🤗1

19 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈7,250 views258 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

👹Три «лживые» карты👺 Верховная жрица, Луна и 7 мечей - в каждой из этих карт есть оттенок pizzдежа и чего-то скрытого. Но мы же с вами не нубасы, чтобы использовать одно и то же значение для этой троицы, правильно? Поэтому сегодня расскажу, какие нюансы есть в каждой из них и как наконец-то начать их отличать друг от друга. #воскресныемудрости

149🔥67💯25❤‍🔥9💘7🎉1

15 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC≈8,160 views93 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

3️⃣ Вариант 3 - вот и ваша очередь Это у нас колода таро мистических моментов - моя персональная любимица. Во время съемки телефон решил вырубиться, так что в двух актах. Расклад довольно причудливый, но, думаю, кому-то нужно это услышать. Пишите, если откликнулось! Также напоминаю - записаться ко мне на личный расклад можно по этой ссылке -> alinazombie.com Там же вы найдете и прайс, а также информацию о моих

❤‍🔥4430🔥14💅3🕊2

15 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC≈6,010 views72 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

2️⃣ Вариант 2 - а это для вас Я не часто "свечу" этой колодой, но сегодня она выдала много интересного! Очень интересно, много ли кому это будет актуально. Пишите! Также напоминаю - записаться ко мне на личный расклад можно по этой ссылке -> alinazombie.com Там же вы найдете и прайс, а также информацию о моих курсах.

55🔥13🥰2💋1💘1

15 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈5,550 views155 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

1️⃣ Вариант 1 - вот ваш расклад. Посмотрим, что вам расскажут ночные зверушки. Пишите, насколько откликается! Также напоминаю - записаться ко мне на личный расклад можно по этой ссылке -> alinazombie.com Там же вы найдете и прайс, а также информацию о моих курсах.

88🔥39❤‍🔥27👍1

15 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC≈5,330 views198 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

✨ Сегодня у нас внезапный Общий Расклад ✨ Периодически у меня возникает непреодолимое желание записать сюда такое. Видимо, кому-то очень надо что-то услышать. Кто знает, может, одно из сегодняшних посланий - именно для вас ❤️ Выбирайте колоду, к которой вас «тянет», и в течение часа я выложу сами расклады.

🔥106🥰3831💘22😇1

12 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC≈7,000 views151 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

❌ Ошибка, про которую не знает 90% тарологов Сегодня расскажу вам про ошибку, которую допускают многие начинающие и даже тарологи-любители. Особенно она актуальна в ситуациях, где есть 2 человека (например, любой расклад на отношения). Из-за этой ошибки некоторые ваши расклады могут быть неточными, вы сами будете в них путаться и, как следствие, нести полный бред. Расскажу, что это за оплошность и что с ней делат

89🔥36❤‍🔥12🍓7💘4💯3

5 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC≈7,980 views150 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

🔄 Как читать карты в негативе? Сегодня поговорим про "перевёрнутые" карты и частой проблеме, которую они вызывают. А именно сложности с тем, чтобы подобрать обратные значения к некоторым картам. 🌞 Например, Солнце. Если в прямом значении - всё хорошо, то в перевёрнутом - всё плохо? Конечно же нет! Расскажу, как же искать эти значения и какую ошибку вы, скорее всего допускаете. А после прослушивания обязательно

90❤‍🔥33🔥24💘2🍓1

29 Jun 2026, 14:47 UTC≈9,070 views366 reactionsread 3 September 2026

⌛️ Важный пост для тех, кому кажется, что вы ничего не успеваете :) Сегодня будет намного старческих наставлений с высоты прожитых лет 😂 🍰 Сегодня мне исполнилось 32 года. И самое важное откровение - моя жизнь СОВСЕМ не такая, какой я ее планировала еще 5-7 лет назад. В разы лучше, откровенно говоря) В 25 мне казалось, что я что-то упустила в этой жизни, что все как-то правильно живут и в правильном направлении и

168🎉110🔥46❤‍🔥21👍6💘6🥰4🦄4

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @zombie_tarot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jun 2026, 16:28 UTCAnonymous Poll1,210 voters approx.

❓ Дублировать ли в ТГ видосы из Тиктока?

  1. Без проблем смотрю Тикток, у меня нет проблем42%
  2. Да, хочу! У меня не работает Тикток15%
  3. Тикток работает, но в ТГ было бы удобнее смотреть43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ТАРОПЕДИЯ | ОБУЧЕНИЕ ТАРО
@taro_pedia · 21,742
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zombie Tarot” (@zombie_tarot), 18,562 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zombie_tarot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.