Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zookinghome 🐕👑🫶

Channel

Zookinghome 🐕👑🫶

@zookinghome

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

160subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 4 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002349799307
TypeChannel
Username@zookinghome
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 November 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zookinghome

Growth

1604 Nov 2026, 15:22 — 160 subscribers4 Nov 2026, 19:29 — 160 subscribers4 Nov 2026, 15:224 Nov 2026, 19:29
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 159–161 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 19:29160no change
4 Nov 2026, 15:22160first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.9%
avg views ÷ 160 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.4
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held18 (12 September 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total587
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 16s
Average length
1m 25s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1734.7%
🔥1428.6%
👍612.2%
💯510.2%
🥰48.16%
🤝24.08%
😢12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (44.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 17:03 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 На картинке выше актуальные окошки Но еще это будет месяц новых услуг! И возвращения социальных прогулок, правда мы их еще совместим с трюками (если захочется) Про это всё расскажу подробнее чуть позже :) С какими запросами можно ко мне обратиться: — реактивность: лай, возбуждение и сильная реакция на собак, людей и другие стимулы — сложности на прогулке: натянутый поводок, невозможность переключиться, пер…

❤2

2 Nov 2026, 06:37 UTC38 views6 reactionsread 4 November 2026

🐾 Мне очень нужна ваша обратная связь! Если мы с вами уже встречались на консультациях, занятиях или я присматривала за вашим хвостиком на ситтинге, буду очень благодарна, если вы уделите буквально пару минут и заполните небольшую анкету 💛 Мне важно понимать, что было для вас полезным, что понравилось, а что можно сделать ещё лучше. Ваши ответы помогут мне улучшать свои услуги и делать их ещё более комфортными и по…

🔥3❤2💯1

31 Oct 2026, 19:25 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Практика таргета бывает очень разной: вот пример с Юнис, ей 6 лет. Она очень смелая и инициативная девочка! Но не очень привыкла к наведению. И мне повезло, что за два дня мы смогли отснять видео и она дошла даже до небольшого следования за таргетом! Так что начинать заниматься никогда не поздно и я искренне считаю, что каждая собака будет счастлива учась чему-то новому :) PS снять с Лори как он делает трюки с тарг…

🔥4

25 Oct 2026, 10:38 UTC86 viewsread 4 November 2026
Poll

Как ваша собака впервые отреагировала на таргет?

  1. Сидела и смотрела, ничего не понимая0%
  2. Пыталась кусать или грызть9%
  3. Сразу пошла нюхать / трогать носом18%
  4. Еще не учили таргету36%
  5. Не знаю что это27%
  6. Другое (напишу комментарий)9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 09:55 UTC72 viewsread 4 November 2026

А вы учили свою собаку таргету? Сейчас записываю для вас видео про таргет — почти волшебную палочку для тренировки собак. Большей магией обладает только маркер/кликер 🤣 И вот стало интересно: а помните, как ваша собака впервые отреагировала на таргет? А если реакция вашей собаки была особенно забавной — расскажите в комментариях! Очень хочу почитать 😂 Давайте узнаем, каких собак больше! 👇

22 Oct 2026, 11:06 UTC90 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Мы, Анастасия Горбаренко и Елизавета Дубошина, собираемся записать подкаст 💛 Хотим поговорить на тему: «Почему ты важнее собаки?» Звучит немного провокационно, да? Но нам хочется поговорить о том, как заботиться о собаке и при этом оставлять место для себя :) Когда собака лает, а ты сгораешь со стыда. Когда хочется в отпуск, но страшно её оставить. Когда знаешь, что рекомендует кинолог, но сил на это просто нет. И…

👍6🔥2

10 Oct 2026, 14:51 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Сила привычки 💪 Мне понадобился почти год, чтобы добавить клетчатку и сложные углеводы в рацион. А от собаки мы иногда ждём изменения привычек за несколько занятий 🙃 И я всё ещё над этим работаю. Хотя вроде бы знаю, что есть, зачем и как. А вот делать регуярно выходит все еще не всегда! Но уже часто :) А в работе с собакой новые привычки формируются сразу у двоих! Человеку нужно: ✨вспомнить про упражнение, ✨выбра…

❤3

28 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTC189 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Ни дня без учёбы 🫠 Недавно я вернулась домой и заметила, что Шиша как будто стала другой 💔😳 Более ворчливой. Не особо хочет, чтобы её гладили, меньше играет, чаще шипит. А ещё я стала замечать, что перед некоторыми прыжками она как будто дольше думает: прыгать или нет, вот в чем вопрос Конечно, первое объяснение было довольно очевидным: у нас недавно появился котёнок, а это само по себе стресс и изменение привычно…

❤4😢1

23 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC177 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟨🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 Наконец расписала окошки на октябрь :) Также планируются групповые занятия по воскресеньям в 9 или 10 утра в районе Дасуди. Планируется чуть измененный формат: хочу совместить социальные группы и трюки/базовые навыки. Но если вам нужна только «социальная» часть, то это не проблема ☺️ Писать @capnclementine Работаю онлайн и офлайн в Лимассоле. Свободные окошки собрала в календаре выше. С какими…

🔥2🥰2❤1

19 Sept 2026, 18:03 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Я вам принесла новость не про собак, но про котиков 🙀 Открыт новый вид, на моей любимой Шри-Ланке (вообще в Боливии, как меня поправила подписчица! Возвращаюсь к поинту о том что даже такие штуки надо перепроверять. Спасибо!) Это Leopardus tilcayo, посмотрите какая красота! Упустила с лекцией несколько дней, но вся моя лента в этой красотке 🥰 Ну вы представляете, 21 век, а тут новый вид котиков (спасибо биоинформат…

🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zookinghome. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Oct 2026, 10:38 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Как ваша собака впервые отреагировала на таргет?

  1. Сидела и смотрела, ничего не понимая0%
  2. Пыталась кусать или грызть9%
  3. Сразу пошла нюхать / трогать носом18%
  4. Еще не учили таргету36%
  5. Не знаю что это27%
  6. Другое (напишу комментарий)9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zookinghome 🐕👑🫶” (@zookinghome), 160 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zookinghome.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.