Channel
@zozacos
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
394subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002066941092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zozacos |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zozacos |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 394 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 391 | +11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 380 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 379 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 381 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 381 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
332 reactions across 8 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 121 | 36.4% | |
| custom 5470174037286084992 | 74 | 22.3% | |
| custom 5472098629311294720 | 32 | 9.64% | |
| custom 5251220500071352905 | 29 | 8.73% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 7.83% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 3.92% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 3.31% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 2.71% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 2.41% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.20% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 0.904% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.301% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.301% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 332 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет! Я уже больше года ломаю голову, что хочу что-то создавать для вас, какой то продукт, какие-то изделия 📒мерч - это здорово, но не цепляет, я имею ввиду, что хочу что-то делать своими руками, а мерч был бы уже дополнением к основному предмету, например … РЕБЯТА, ПОМОГИТЕ! 😢Что бы вам хотелось от меня как от автора? Одежду? Аксессуары? Боксы какие-то? КОКОШНИКИ??????😂 По каким Вселенным? В какой тематике…
❤15❤🔥3🔥1
Я влюбилась! Вообще в этот образ Вайноны Райдер из фильма « Дракула» 1992 я влюблена Оочень давно! Ежегодно пересматриваю фильм и таю, там еще Киану Ривз молоденький такой 😏 Недавно посмотрела новую экранизацию «Дракулы», разочарована… вообще не тот вайб и актер не в моем вкусе абсолютно и доспех у него в начале фильма, как будто он рыцарь-шишка 😅 В общем, речь не о фильмах! Я уже боюсь что-то добавлять в свои пош…
custom 525122050007135290522❤7🥰2
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 В славянской мифологии шутовка - один из образов злой русалки. Этнографы их описывали как женщин с длинными волосами и холодными, худыми руками, бледной зеленоватой кожей. Встречали в реках, озёрах и болотах: они расчесывали волосы, умывались, прихорашивались у воды, смеялись, разговаривали и шутили. Именно такую дикую, немного безумную и совсем не сказочную красавицу мы и попытались показать в этой съёмке…
custom 547017403728608499222❤13custom 52512205000713529057
Ближайшие две недели - жабимся 🐸
❤22😁11🍓5❤🔥1👍1🔥1🥰1
Родственники: радуются, что Зоя стала делать костюмы всяких царевн, снегурочек Зоза: делает болотную злую , вредную хтонь. Радуется 🐸 💚🤩💚🤩💚🤩💚
❤30❤🔥19🔥10custom 54720986293112947207🍓1👍1💘1🥰1
Я хз что стало с цитатами в тг, но нормально он не оформляет их, ломает на куски, стирает текст, если редактируешь с цитатой, не дает вставлять стикеры, если есть цитата 🤡 так что буду жертвовать компактностью постов, но зато будет какое, никакое оформление…🫢
💯9❤6⚡1👍1🔥1
А у меня готовы фоточки 🐸 Персонаж будет Шутовка - злой славянских дух воды С меня написание истории, фото и атмосфера жуткой красоты, с вас 🍀 🍄 С сентября новый косплей проект, а в августе займусь пошивом подарка для конкурса 🙂 Фотограф Лёля
custom 547017403728608499229custom 547209862931129472020❤13❤🔥3🍓2
Надо придумать что это за персонаж, напишу о ней историю, нужна помощь зала 🌚 Как возникла эта съемка: Весной общались с Лёлей и она сказала, что с радостью бы меня засунула в какую-нибудь реку отснять речную хтонь 🌚 На костюм с нуля времени не было, поэтому я пожертвовала своим самым первым славянским образом Мары, который сделала еще году в 20, убрала яркие детали, оторвала манжеты и изрядно потрепала края рукав…
custom 547017403728608499223❤15custom 54720986293112947205
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @zozacos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Зозушка ♥️ сказочный косплей” (@zozacos), 394 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zozacos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.