Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,338–6,453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:01
6,355
+4
13 Sept 2026, 14:58
6,351
-14
9 Sept 2026, 09:00
6,365
-32
3 Sept 2026, 17:01
6,397
+13
31 Aug 2026, 05:28
6,384
+12
27 Aug 2026, 22:03
6,372
-17
24 Aug 2026, 15:16
6,389
-7
21 Aug 2026, 00:22
6,396
-17
17 Aug 2026, 17:28
6,413
-14
14 Aug 2026, 21:55
6,427
-8
11 Aug 2026, 14:42
6,435
-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:08
6,440
+7
7 Aug 2026, 09:01
6,433
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:59
6,433
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 26s
Average length
2m 29s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
337 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
122
36.2%
🔥
89
26.4%
🤣
47
13.9%
😁
34
10.1%
❤
21
6.23%
🤝
14
4.15%
🙏
8
2.37%
💩
1
0.297%
🥱
1
0.297%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 337 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 24 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zudiloff1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я вот все пишу, какая $SOL крутая, но это больше интересно тем, кто арбитражит и работает крипто-крипто,
а что если я вам сегодня расскажу, что вы можете арбитражить международку со своими друзьями в 170 странах с помощью
MoneyGram + Solana:
и посмотрим на новость глазами арбитражника
Большинство увидело новость:
MoneyGram подключила USDC на Solana.
то есть, появился ещё один фиатный шлюз между локальными рынками раз…
часто вижу вот такое в разных группах по крипте и т.д.
$500 млн ликвидаций шортов сверху. Значит сейчас пойдём их ликвидировать?
Не обязательно
Даже ни то что не обязательно, скорее всего это не так вовсе.
Одна из ошибок при работе с CoinGlass и иже с ним — воспринимать карту ликвидаций ,как карту гарантированного движения цены.
Видим огромное скопление ликвидаций выше текущей цены и логика простая:
цена ходит от …
Дед-пердет
Тебя обошли на повороте.
Пока ты играешь в "монополию", как тебя учили фин грамотности в детстве твои родители на примере этой игры.
Мир жил и живёт немного по другим правилам
Дальше уже повышать ставки некуда
Можно отрубить голову змее. Но что делать с гидрой?
На днях в Москве закрыли около 20 незаконных криптообменников.
И общий вектор понятен: государство хочет, чтобы криптовалютные операции постепенно переходили в контролируемый контур — понятные операторы, регулирование, отчётность, возможность видеть движение денег.
С точки зрения государства это абсолютно логично.
Но здесь возникает интересное противоречие.
Крип…
Перевод на биржу не равен продаже
Одна из самых распространённых ошибок,что я вижу в ТГ со всякими ботами-анализаторами с ончейн-анализом — чекнул крупное движение токенов и сразу написать:
«Фонд начал продавать.»
вы вообще откуда это взяли?) На самом деле всё гораздо сложнее, вариантов масса почему так было сделано, пример: Компания завела 500 000 BTW, через несколько минут эти монеты покинули кошелёк? Большинство Т…
📈 Надежный платежный партнер приглашает к сотрудничеству
Работаем с командами, провайдерами и всеми, кто заинтересован в стабильной закупке USDT по выгодным условиям (ниже рынка) через C2C / СБП.
Особый фокус — ночной трафик (23:00–09:00) с доступной ликвидностью.
Также открыты к партнёрству с:
товарным бизнесом
карго-направлениями
обменами для сотрудников рыбопромышленных компаний
переводами в Туркменистан
e-comm…
Короткое видео по нашему первому бесплатному(на данный момент) сервису, как и обещал
Сервис №1 — Умный торговый дашборд
если было интересно, с вас - 👍
🤝 Хочешь с нами?
Условия вступления находятся в боте:
@zudiloff_verification_bot
или в ЛС
@Kostas89
Почему я хочу, чтобы вы стали богаты, читая этот канал?
И нет, это не потому, что я добрый самаритянин.
Наоборот.
У меня есть вполне эгоистичная причина.
Я давно понял одну вещь.
Самый дорогой актив в моей жизни — это не криптовалюта, не недвижимость и даже не капитал.
Самый дорогой актив — это окружение.
Чем сильнее становятся люди вокруг меня, тем больше возможностей появляется и у меня.
Появляются крупные …
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @zudiloff1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Cartesius channel @LexagencyLawStream · 29,614 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
ФинТех|Обмен валют @FinTechExchange1 · 23,744 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 17 September 2026
Менделеевщина! @mendeleevshina · 23,888 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Тот самый 115-ФЗ @tot115fz · 26,517 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
Dashi Finance @dashi_finance · 34,135 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Bitpapa Media @bitpapa_io · 106,971 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
Питупи @mediap2p · 90,806 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Satoshkin @satoshkin · 31,927 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zudiloff Crypto” (@zudiloff1), 6,355 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zudiloff1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.