Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for پارچه سرای پاشا

Channel

پارچه سرای پاشا

@zzhyan_1

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

6,664subscribers

-468 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002012500940
TypeChannel
Username@zzhyan_1
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zzhyan_1

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

11.9 average views per post against 6,666 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.178%. Across the 5,759 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,203–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured23 of 23 published in the window (23 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled273
Mature posts only0.191% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers6,666 measured 2 November 2026
Cohortb3162:fas · 5,759 channels · p10 2.16% · p25 5.05% · p50 11.1% · p75 21.9% · p90 35.8%
Position in cohort0.434th percentile · 1/63 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,6647,1326,8987 August 2026 — 7,132 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,124 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,110 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,098 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,083 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,065 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,057 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,035 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,020 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,008 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,987 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,948 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,923 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,904 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,856 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,797 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,773 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,755 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,742 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,736 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,714 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,697 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,687 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,679 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,666 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,664 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -468. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,594–7,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 01:566,664-2
2 Nov 2026, 23:366,666-13
31 Oct 2026, 08:186,679-8
28 Oct 2026, 17:196,687-10
26 Oct 2026, 00:496,697-17
23 Oct 2026, 10:116,714-22
20 Oct 2026, 11:296,736-6
17 Oct 2026, 12:206,742-13
14 Oct 2026, 08:156,755-18
10 Oct 2026, 21:406,773-24
4 Oct 2026, 23:576,797-59
25 Sept 2026, 16:406,856-48
17 Sept 2026, 03:596,904-19
13 Sept 2026, 13:566,923-25
9 Sept 2026, 20:556,948-39
4 Sept 2026, 07:566,987-21
1 Sept 2026, 03:487,008-12
29 Aug 2026, 08:447,020-15
26 Aug 2026, 08:027,035-22
22 Aug 2026, 23:367,057first reading

Engagement

94 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.18%
avg views ÷ 6,664 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.0
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
101.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 94 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held94 (31 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total323
Reactions total328
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
903
Videos
166
Links
554

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 45s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,158 reactions across 94 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😍24621.2%
🔥15113.0%
🕊13912.0%
👏12010.4%
❤‍🔥1159.93%
😁615.27%
🎉524.49%
🥰484.15%
😘332.85%
🤩332.85%
🐳322.76%
⚡292.50%
👍292.50%
🙈282.42%
❤221.90%
💯201.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTC3 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yosuf_last

یکی بیاد باهم چت کنیم😻💋

🎉3🕊2😍2❤‍🔥1👏1🔥1🥰1😁1

5 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTC6 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yosuf_lastPhoto

🤔کد های انترنتی رایگان🩴 انترنت رایگان برای تمام بسته ها فقد برای امشب کد بسته هاره ده کانال زیر میمانم دکمه دلخواه خود را کلیک کنن وه کد نت رایکان بکرن😻 https://t.me/addlist/uydiXrralYljNzZl شرکت در لیست @pv_yosuf_3k🌷

😍4🕊2❤1❤‍🔥1🎉1🐳1👏1🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC10 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ئـەم چـەنـاڵـە بـۆ فـرۆشـتـنـە ✈️ 📣@gringneyt ئـەوە چـەنـاڵـەکـەیـە ⬅️بـۆ داوە کـردن نـامـە بـنـێـرە ⬅️⬇️ 🚪Telegram @KaK_ReB4 💎Fib 7515206951 ✈️Chnal @ro_0_or 📣@Froshgay_reba

😍4⚡2❤‍🔥1👏1🔥1🕊1

5 Nov 2026, 10:54 UTC5 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

هەر کامەت لە خوارەوە دەوێت دەستی پێدابێنه😍👇 بو بژداری له لیست👇 @Listkurdi_bot

⚡2😍2❤‍🔥1🎉1👏1🔥1🕊1😁1

4 Nov 2026, 19:47 UTC6 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yosuf_last

یکی بیاد باهم چت کنیم😻💋

😍3🔥2🕊2⚡1❤‍🔥1👏1💯1🤩1

4 Nov 2026, 19:47 UTC5 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yosuf_lastPhoto

میخایی ادیتـور شـوی؟ ☕ https://t.me/addlist/uydiXrralYljNzZl کـانال های آموزش ادیت زدن ویدیو پروفایل و خیلی چیـزا دکه بـرتان آوردیم فقد دکمه مورد علاقه خـود را بزنن آموزش و کد هاره بکرن🤔 فونت های ادیت🔥 کد های پروفایل🤤 کد های ادیت شده در الایت مـوشن🔥🔥🔥 کـد های ادیت شده در ویدیو اسـتار😠 انترنت رایگان❤️ آموزش حک تلگرام و واتساپ 🗿 وه یک بخش دکه از کانال های انترنت رایگان آموزش حکری و پرمیم رایگان…

🔥2😍2😘2⚡1❤1❤‍🔥1🎉1👏1

4 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC11 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026

هەر کامەت لە خوارەوە دەوێت دەستی پێدابێنه😍👇 بو بژداری له لیست👇 @Listkurdi_bot

😍4🔥2⚡1❤‍🔥1🎉1👏1🕊1🥰1

3 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC15 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yosuf_last

برای شرکت در لیست پر جذب تلگرام پیوی تگ بدین کانال هایتان را شرایط : برای لیست اول کانال های 1k بالا لیست دوم : 500 پاین @pv_yosuf_3k

❤‍🔥2😍2🐳1👍1👏1🔥1🕊1😁1

3 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC9 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yosuf_lastPhoto

میخایی ادیتـور شـوی؟ ☕ https://t.me/addlist/uydiXrralYljNzZl کـانال های آموزش ادیت زدن ویدیو پروفایل و خیلی چیـزا دکه بـرتان آوردیم فقد دکمه مورد علاقه خـود را بزنن آموزش و کد هاره بکرن🤔 فونت های ادیت🔥 کد های پروفایل🤤 کد های ادیت شده در الایت مـوشن🔥🔥🔥 کـد های ادیت شده در ویدیو اسـتار😠 انترنت رایگان❤️ آموزش حک تلگرام و واتساپ 🗿 وه یک بخش دکه از کانال های انترنت رایگان آموزش حکری و پرمیم رایگان…

⚡2🕊2😁2😍2❤‍🔥1🎉1👏1🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 10:50 UTC9 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

هەر کامەت لە خوارەوە دەوێت دەستی پێدابێنه😍👇 بو بژداری له لیست👇 @S_A_N_Y_A_R_1

🔥2😍2❤‍🔥1🎉1🐳1👍1👏1🕊1

2 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC12 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yosuf_last

یکی بیاد باهم چت کنیم😻💋

😍3🕊2❤‍🔥1🎉1👏1🔥1🙈1

2 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC4 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yosuf_lastPhoto

میخایی ادیتـور شـوی؟ ☕ https://t.me/addlist/uydiXrralYljNzZl کـانال های آموزش ادیت زدن ویدیو پروفایل و خیلی چیـزا دکه بـرتان آوردیم فقد دکمه مورد علاقه خـود را بزنن آموزش و کد هاره بکرن🤔 فونت های ادیت🔥 کد های پروفایل🤤 کد های ادیت شده در الایت مـوشن🔥🔥🔥 کـد های ادیت شده در ویدیو اسـتار😠 انترنت رایگان❤️ آموزش حک تلگرام و واتساپ 🗿 وه یک بخش دکه از کانال های انترنت رایگان آموزش حکری و پرمیم رایگان…

👏2🔥2🕊2😍2❤‍🔥1🐳1😘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @zzhyan_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @zzhyan_1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
11 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پارچه سرای پاشا” (@zzhyan_1), 6,664 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzhyan_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.