Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مؤلفات علي ناظم فليح

Channel

مؤلفات علي ناظم فليح

@zzxdxdfff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

179subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002695437421
TypeChannel
Username@zzxdxdfff
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zzxdxdfff

Growth

178197187.513 August 2026 — 197 subscribers13 August 2026 — 196 subscribers20 August 2026 — 185 subscribers28 August 2026 — 178 subscribers12 September 2026 — 179 subscribers17913 August 202612 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 175–200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 10:21179+1
28 Aug 2026, 16:52178-7
20 Aug 2026, 16:58185-11
13 Aug 2026, 11:38196-1
13 Aug 2026, 06:33197first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 00s
Average length
3m 00s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

264 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21179.9%
103.79%
83.03%
🙈62.27%
😎51.89%
🆒41.52%
😇41.52%
🥱41.52%
😡31.14%
🐳20.758%
👌20.758%
🕊20.758%
🥰20.758%
💯10.379%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC18 viewsread 13 August 2026

نقرأ في استشهاد أمير المؤمنين علي عليه السلام: «تهدّمت والله أركان الهدى، وانطمست والله نجوم السماء وأعلام التقى، وانفصمت والله العروة الوثقى، قُتل ابن عم محمد المصطفى، قُتل الوصي المجتبى... قُتل علي المرتضى، قُتل والله سيد الأوصياء، قتله أشقى الأشقياء». ونقرأ في مصاب أبي عبد الله الحسين عليه السلام: عن الإمام علي بن موسى الرضا عليه السلام: «إن يوم الحسين أقرح جفوننا، وأسبل دموعنا، وأذل عزيزنا بأرض كرب والبلاء، وأ

11 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

السؤال/ ماصحة نسبة هذا الحديث إلى الإمام الصادق (ع) (كلنا سفن النجاة ولكن سفينة جدي الحسين أوسع وفي لجج البحار أسرع) المصدر بحارالأنوار:ج٢٦،ص٣٢٢،ح١٤ ؟ الجواب/ ١-لم يرد في مصادر السنة والشيعة الأصلية والفرعية التي وصلتْ إلينا . ٢-المصدر المذكور أسفل الحديث غير صحيح فالحديث غير موجود في بحارالأنوار قط وما وُضِع مع الحديث إلا لخداع الناس به . ٣-أشار الشيخ الريشهري الى هذا الحديث الموضوع في كتابه موسوعة الإمام الحسي

🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC79 viewsread 13 August 2026

ملاحظة : ما نقلته هو من هذه القناة و أنصح بها جداً. ✍️/الأحاديث المكذوبة والمحرفة على أهل البيت (ع) https://t.me/Ahmaed202096

10 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC144 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

هل يمكن بعد كل هذه الأكاذيب أن نجعل من هذا الشخص قدوة؟

1💯1

10 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ahmaed202096Video

شواهد وشوارد : عندما وثقت سرقة علاء المهدوي بالصور وسجلت له فيديو وأنزلتُ منشوراً بالسرقة هاجت عليه الناس لأنهم يعرفون منشورات الصفحة لمتابعتهم لها قبل ٣ سنين من السرقة فخاف من افتضاح أمره فقام بحذف المنشور الذي أبرز عضلاته فيه وتحدى الناس به وكانت هذه القشة التي قصمت ظهر البعير ولكن الأعجب من ذلك قد سأله بعض متابعيه عن هذه السرقة فقام بتنزيل فيديو وقد وصلنا وأطلعنا عليه يقول فيه أنا تكلمت من زمن بالأحاديث الكاذبة م

1

10 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC129 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🔴شبهة وجواب : زعم علاء المهدوي جهلاً أن (مسيلمة الكذاب ظُلِم)وكان يؤمن برسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وصدقه وارتد مسيلمة بعد شهادة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله بسبب أفعال أبي بكر ...؟؟؟الى آخر كلامه . رد الشبهة/ ١-إن مسيلمة الكذاب لم يكن مؤمناً مظلوماً وارتد في زمان النبي(صلى الله عليه وآله) وليس كما يزعم علاء المهدوي وأن مسيلمة جاء الى النبي وقال له أشركني في النبوة ولم يشركه فارتد ورجع كافراً وصنع له قرآناً وإلي

1

10 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

١-لم نعثر على مصدرٍ لهذه الرواية من مصادر السنة والشيعة التي وصلتْ إلينا. ٢-أُويس القرني(رضوان الله عليه) وُجِدَ مقتولاً في معركة صفين والروايات تذكر ذلك من دون حضور الإمام علي (عليه السلام) عند خروج روحه .فقد روى الشريف الرضي(ت٤٠٦)هـ عن الأصبغ بن نباتة، قال: كنت مع أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام بصفين فبايعه تسعة وتسعون رجلا ثم قال: أين تمام المائة؟ فقد عهد إلي رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله إنه يبايعني في هذا اليوم مائة ر

1

10 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC112 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

السؤال/ماصحة نسبة هذا الحديث إلى الإمام الصادق (ع) (إبدأ طعامك بالملح والمراد من الملح هو إن الميم ميم محمد واللام لام علي والحاء حاء الحسن والحسين)؟ الجواب / ١-لم يرد في مصادر السنة والشيعة التي وصلتْ إلينا . ٢-في تركيبه ضعف لأن في كل الحروف بدأ بأول حرف من الأسماء أعلاه ولما جاء إلى اسم الإمام علي(عليه السلام)فلم يجد حرف العين في كلمة (ملح)فانتقل الى اللام . ٣-روايات الابتداء بالملح كثيرة ولكن من دون هذه الزيا

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zzxdxdfff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مؤلفات علي ناظم فليح” (@zzxdxdfff), 179 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzxdxdfff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.