Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, Learn the science of #Elliott-Neo wave forecasting along with #Ichimoku cloud, #Fibonacci trading systems in TRISHUL Membership Program. Live Webinar in Sutra of Waves on 10th & 11th Oct. Register here: https://www.wavesstrategy.com/trishul-form

Channel
Ashish Kyal Trading Gurukul ️
@AKTradingGurukul
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,654subscribers
-585 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001456128948 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AKTradingGurukul |
| Description | Waves Strategy Advisors | SEBI RA INH000001097 Ashish Kyal Trading Gurukul. Learn Technical Analysis, Elliott wave, Neo Wave, Time Cycles. +919920422202 wavesstrategy.com, Disclosure: https://tinyurl.com/z6usr93v |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AKTradingGurukul |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 29,654 | -65 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 29,719 | -32 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 29,751 | -39 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 29,790 | -69 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 29,859 | -123 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:42 | 29,982 | -42 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 30,024 | -24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:24 | 30,048 | -42 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:44 | 30,090 | -60 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 30,150 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 30,168 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 30,178 | -31 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 30,209 | -67 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 30,276 | -48 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 30,324 | -19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 30,343 | +7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 30,336 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 30,337 | +14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 30,323 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 30,322 | first reading |
Engagement
405 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.1%
- avg views ÷ 29,654 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,470
- 208 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.441%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 209
- of 405 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 207 of 208 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 405 (6 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 928,963 |
| Reactions total | 4,097 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 17:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,010
- Videos
- ≈348
- Links
- ≈10,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 37m 49s
- Average length
- 1m 53s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,876 reactions across 403 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,770 | 38.2% | |
| 👍 | 3,621 | 36.7% | |
| 🌚 | 955 | 9.67% | |
| 😁 | 350 | 3.54% | |
| 👌 | 334 | 3.38% | |
| 🔥 | 313 | 3.17% | |
| 🤔 | 101 | 1.02% | |
| 🕊 | 78 | 0.79% | |
| 🙏 | 77 | 0.78% | |
| 👏 | 65 | 0.658% | |
| 🎉 | 54 | 0.547% | |
| 🤩 | 46 | 0.466% | |
| 💯 | 38 | 0.385% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 0.253% | |
| 🫡 | 22 | 0.223% | |
| 🤝 | 13 | 0.132% | |
| 😎 | 8 | 0.081% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.061% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 403 of the 405 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,876 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 405 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 108
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 404 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 100
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AKTradingGurukul. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 405 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, #Nifty is still below daily Supertrend, close above 23560 is must as per this indicator for medium term reversal, until then sell for move to 23240-23120 lvl, 23480 resistance is working like a charm if you following my Nifty tweets
👍22
Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, #Nifty trend is yet to emerge, but an asset where strong 3rd #Elliottwave pattern has started & trade setup using #Ichimoku cloud check in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1co85rsGYc Delta Exchange Link: https://india.delta.exchange/?code=NFRKQC
❤1👍1
Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, #Nifty did not break above 23480 levels tweeted since 2 days, prices are showing rejection from higher levels, possible move to 23350 - 23280, high OI near 23500 put side as major hurdle, Bear call spread options is good strategy
👍14🙏6❤5
Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, #GNFC rallied over 5% after breaking the prior swing high near 616. Read the analysis of the #Ichimoku Cloud setup, #AK Indicator momentum and price action for potential upside move. Read More: https://www.wavesstrategy.com/blog/ichimoku-cloud-strategy-for-big-stock-moves
🌚3❤2
Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, #Nykaa 330 CE — #Keltner Channel + #AK Indicator setup worked well when applied directly to the option chart. Prices have broken above the upper band, with AK Indicator turning positive. Any dip towards the mid-band towards 8 followed by a move back above the upper Keltner Band could offer a fresh entry opportunity.
❤8🌚2🕊2🤔2
Ashish Kyal will be Live on CNBC Awaaz today at 2:00 PM. He'll give his views on #Nifty overall market outlook with his hand-picked selective stocks! You can keep watching to gain valuable market insights. Watch now
👍8❤3🌚1
#Nifty breakout yet? #NSE marketlens is the magic wand or just another free tool that everyone is talking about, Screener site or nse marketlens which one you pick? check in this video: https://x.com/kyalashish/status/2102656898252370064?s=20
❤11🌚2💯1
Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, #Nifty reversed from 23480 hurdle tweeted yesterday, break below 23280 will resume down move to 23150-23120 levels as long as 23420 is intact, levels are working precisely as per #Elliottwave, trending move can start today!
👍73❤10🌚5😁4🕊1🤩1
Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, Vinay, our #AKTG member, used #Keltner Channel on 5-minute chart with #Supertrend to identify precise #Nifty Call and Put Options levels. 3 months of #Trishul Membership Program helps you to time the Market without FOMO. Register here: https://www.wavesstrategy.com/trishul-form
🌚2👌2❤1😁1
Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, #Nifty completed flag pattern, below 23280 will confirm trend to 23150-23120 in wave e, prices made high at 23480 near upper hurdle of 23480 tweeted in morning & reversed! Nse market scanner you want me to show its power? Comment 👇 https://x.com/kyalashish/status/2102425337821073427
❤6🌚1
Waves Strategy Advisors, SEBI RA INH000001097, BHARATFORG 2000 CE- Volume profile + EMA applied directly on option charts. Prices recently took support of 20 EMA and now trading near the high-POC zone. A move above 29 zone could signal fresh momentum.
❤8👍4🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 405 posts we hold for @AKTradingGurukul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Since 3 August CAS introduction compared with before, what has happened to your Options trading activity?
- Options Trading more than before13%
- Options Trading less post CAS40%
- Almost Stopped Trading Options46%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 405 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Gann_Hidden_secret · 6,178#1
@trendonomicsbyharshdixit · 4,499#2
@ganndecoder · 10,000#3
@chartians · 56,982#4
@FortuneSignals369 · 17,119#5
@NKsingh100 · 67,800#6
@niftyganntheory · 2,358#7
@Elliott_wave_India · 10,194#8
@MovingWithPlanets_MUKESH · 2,040#9
@SuperTraderLakshya · 126,239#10
@indextradingnitin · 200,405#11
@fiboganmcx · 5,621#12
@thetagainers · 112,736#13
@Chartinkk · 3,220#14
@WdgannsandipTradingViewindicator · 2,069#15
@StockyMind · 11,551#16
@FibonacciNWaves · 2,104#17
@unit_of_technical_analysis · 2,831#18
@GannStudies · 4,223#19
@TradingIdeasByDarshan · 5,547#20
@AKVEquityResearch · 8,504#21
@trader_ritvi · 9,328#22
@bullman_gann · 836 (as read 7 September 2026)#23
@Astrolog_360 · 2,348#24
@LearnBetterwithSheetal · 8,846#25
@AnirbanMarketDiary_NoPaidService · 13,431#26
@FinanceWithSunil · 93,527#27
@sweegluew · 2,944#28
@chartkingz · 6,841#29
@Gann_SharadJhun · 13,270#30
@sunilcryptocircle · 8,830#31
@prashantbhansali · 1,505#32
@abnstocks · 2,615#33
@priceactionexpert · 23,881#34
@platinumresearchs · 9,241#35
@intellxis · 220#36
@Darkhorseofstockmarket · 44,585#37
@shortterm07 · 57,379#38
@fnotraders · 6,242#39
@tradingvsinvesting · 2,834#40
@ndtvprofitnews · 48,297#41
@Chart_Wallah · 44,995#42
@kuttrapali26 · 91,779#43
@elliottwavecount · 199,880#44
@MaverickAmit01 · 6,266#45
@VRSuccessfull · 7,178#46
@NEoWaveAC · 993#47
@moneycontrolcom · 236,761#48
@Trade_with_Omkaar · 305#49
@marketmasterhub1269 · 8,223#50
@HubOfFinance · 2,348#51
@DGPIndia · 90,693#52
@elliottwavemonitor · 10,971#53
@bahetyashish · 5,132#54
@elliottwaveofficial · 1,676#55
@qappsocial · 11,424#56
@MathTrading · 1,992#57
@Elliott_Waves_Academy_TA · 19,477#58
@stockstix · 7,780#59
@market_wizaard · 2,298#60
@ewstrategy · 61,266#61
@stocksbyYA · 2,185#62
@marketanalysisniftybanknifty · 32,083#63
@twelvecalls · 2,674#64
@chartbank · 64,987#65
@Virendrapandey81 · 85,469#66
@BuyBeforeBreakout · 10,339#67
@HarmonicsTraders · 8,138#68
@elliottwavesecret · 12,374#69
@FOGYAN · 5,997#70
@Stockizenofficial · 49,658#71
@RPtechnicals · 8,772#72
@moneycreatesmoney · 131,518#73
@Techno_charts · 30,485#74
@TradeTheTrend_99 · 30,192#75
@cnbc_tv18 · 77,682#76
@uremo24 · 13,973#77
@thetradingmarvel29 · 19,537#78
@vijay_bhambwani · 6,179#79
@tradewithlogic619 · 29,358#80
@eagleeyesmarketanalysis · 38,184#81
@stockpro_online · 268,229#82
@tradelikeberlin · 148,879#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@thetagainers · 112,736
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
@NKsingh100 · 67,800
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@MarketWolfApp · 25,176
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 September 2026
@G2020_CRICKET · 44,561
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
@priceactionexpert · 23,881
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 September 2026
@RuchirGuptaTradingInvesting · 103,496
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
@voodootrainings · 54,887
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@MetaverseTA · 49,351
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
@umeshsharmachartanalysis · 39,350
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
@aatradingblog · 23,273
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
@JoinDhan · 49,946
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@chartians · 56,982
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@NayanPokharkar · 95,641
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
@RakeshAlgo · 33,957
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
@PhoenixCommoditiesOfficial · 25,257
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
@Virendrapandey81 · 85,469
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
@marketanalysisniftybanknifty · 32,083
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
@itsvijaythk · 22,385
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
@MohitShrama · 60,074
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
@chartcommando · 27,158
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
@becomeanindependenttrader · 56,273
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@gameofcharts · 29,102
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@plutusadvisors · 22,317
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
@mkjtalks4investment · 57,153
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ashish Kyal Trading Gurukul ️” (@AKTradingGurukul), 29,654 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AKTradingGurukul.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.