Channel
@ewstrategy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
61,410subscribers
+151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440615761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ewstrategy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ewstrategy |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 61,410 | -51 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:51 | 61,461 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 61,477 | -32 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 61,509 | -38 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 61,547 | -14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 61,561 | -16 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 61,577 | -33 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:17 | 61,610 | -15 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:11 | 61,625 | -48 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 61,673 | -20 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 61,693 | +51 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 01:40 | 61,642 | +286 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 61,356 | +90 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 61,266 | +109 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 61,157 | +100 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 61,057 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 61,052 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 61,066 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 61,068 | +2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 61,066 | first reading |
92 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 156 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 92 (19 July 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 497,670 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 09:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#GBPJPY 🇬🇧🇯🇵 The drop from the August high was five waves. Since the September low, GBPJPY has been correcting in a W-X-Y, and price is now in the last leg, (c) of Y. I give it a little more room into the upper red line, then I expect the turn. If price drops back under 208.19 first, the turn has already started. The next leg down points back toward the September lows. If the rise runs well past the red line instea…
#XAUUSD 🥇 Gold is at a fork, so today I’m sharing both counts. First chart, count 1, the one I shared on Wednesday: the October range is a triangle in wave ④, and wave ⑤ still drops into the 4,000 box. Second chart, count 2: the correction ended in October, and wave 3 up is next. Above 4,198.94, count 2 takes over. Until one of them breaks, I don’t force it. In Premium you’ll see which count is active after the b…
#EURUSD 🇪🇺🇺🇸 On Thursday I wrote what I wanted to see: a pullback that stays above 1.11128, then a break above the bounce high. The pullback came this morning. Price dipped to the 0.5 level at 1.1191 and buyers stepped in right away. A deeper dip to 1.1173 is still possible and wouldn’t change the count. Below 1.11128 it would. From this area I expect the rise to continue, first toward 1.1329, then 1.1426. A break…
#DXY 🇺🇸 The big picture before the new week. The dollar’s rise since February looks like a correction. On the 2-day chart it’s a W-X-Y-X-Z move that stopped at 102.945, at the 50% retracement of last year’s decline. I marked that zone on October 7. Price touched the start of it and turned down hard. I count wave (B) as complete. Wave (C) should take the dollar back toward the February low near 95.55. Above 102.945…
#GBPUSD 🇬🇧🇺🇸 Yesterday I wrote that a dollar turn would bring opportunities in many pairs. Cable is one of them. Price broke below the range low on Wednesday, touched 1.3137 and turned straight back up. I count that spike as the end of wave 2. The first push up is almost done. Next I expect a pullback, and that pullback is where I’d plan the long for the next move higher. Below 1.31372 this count is off and I star…
#EURUSD 🇪🇺🇺🇸 In my last update I was looking for one more decline toward 1.11. It came. Price dropped to 1.1113 and then turned sharply. It’s still early to call the low, so it’s early to plan a trade too. With US data later today, I’d rather let the chart confirm it. The scenario I want to see: a pullback that stays above 1.11128, then a break above the high of this bounce. That would finish the correction. And …
#XAUUSD After today’s CPI, gold is moving lower again, and I still see wave ⑤ extending towards $4,000. That's where I'll watch for a possible turn. Before considering a long, I want to see an impulse up followed by a small correction. Join us on Premium with a 50% discount on annual and lifetime memberships!
#XAGUSD 🥈 The pullback we discussed on Friday has arrived. Silver dipped slightly below the 61.8% retracement and is now moving higher again. I think the W-X-Y correction ended at last week's low. I'd like to see price break above the recent high next, and I've updated the chart with a move towards $67 in mind.
#EURUSD 🇪🇺🇺🇸 This correction has kept us waiting a little longer since the last update :) I still count this triangle as wave ④, with one more decline to come. Price is now back near the lower trendline. A break below it would support a move towards 1.11 and slightly lower to complete wave ⑤. Join us in Premium to follow our trading plan for this next leg.
#ETHUSDT I count five waves up from the June low, followed by an (a)-(b)-(c) correction. I think wave (c) still has room to fall towards $2,156-2,003, the 50-61.8% retracement area. That's where I'll start looking for a turn higher. I'd want to see the first impulse and a small correction before planning a long. Join me in Premium next week as I follow the smaller waves of this decline and work on the entry plan i…
#XAGUSD 🥈 The correction went deeper than I expected in our last update. Silver has now broken above the falling trendline, and I think this W-X-Y may be complete. I’m looking for a pullback before another move towards $64. A break below $58.50 would invalidate this count. I’ll be watching that pullback for a possible entry. Join me in Premium to follow the updated count and trading plan.
#BTCUSDT I don’t think this correction is finished yet. My count points to a drop towards $79,500, followed by a bounce towards $82,000. After that, I expect another move lower towards $77,500, the 38.2% retracement, to complete wave 4. I’m still looking for a turn higher once this correction ends, but the first bounce may come before the final low.
Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @ewstrategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Çetin Çalışkan |
|---|---|
| Description | Elliott Wave analyst and founder of Elliott Wave Strategy (EWS) |
| X / Twitter | @ewstrategy |
| Official site | https://www.ew-strategy.com |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elliott Wave Strategy” (@ewstrategy), 61,410 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ewstrategy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.