Channel
@ewstrategy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
61,066subscribers
-193 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440615761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ewstrategy |
| Description | 📈 Elliott Waves & Price Action 📉 Currencies | Indices | Metals | Energy | Crypto |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ewstrategy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 61,066 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 61,079 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:05 | 61,071 | +20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:05 | 61,051 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 61,069 | +20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 61,049 | +18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 61,031 | -19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 61,050 | +24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 61,026 | +23 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 61,003 | +35 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 60,968 | +16 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 60,952 | +33 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 60,919 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 60,926 | -31 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 60,957 | -27 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:59 | 60,984 | -32 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 61,016 | -29 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 61,045 | -17 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 61,062 | -89 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:29 | 61,151 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (19 July 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 402,880 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
#XAGUSD - (Chart Link) You don't need to be right every time. You need to know what to do when you are wrong. This is how we approach a setup. We first map the possible scenarios, then define where an entry could make sense, where the risk should be managed and what level would invalidate the idea. On XAGUSD, we have two possible paths. Both have their own entry and stop areas. The important part is not predicti…
#GBPJPY 🇬🇧🇯🇵 - (Chart Link) This is why we start with the Daily chart. At the beginning of the week, we shared this GBPJPY Daily analysis with our Premium members, mapping the larger correction and the key levels to watch. Now, a few days later, the 4H chart is showing how that structure is developing. The Daily chart gives us the bigger picture and the main scenario. Lower timeframes help us follow the move and …
#NAS100 #US100 🇺🇸 - (Chart Link) Yesterday it was the #SPX500. Today, the #NAS100 is showing a very similar setup. After five waves to the upside, a correction, likely to continue further, is coming. The expected correction zone is marked on the chart. If the price reacts from the 50%-61.8% Fib zone, the larger uptrend should remain intact.
#SPX500 #US500 🇺🇸 - (Chart Link) Markets spend more time correcting than trending. If you can't read corrections, you can't read the market. On SPX500, we're watching where this correction could end and waiting for confirmation before the next move higher. No rush. Let the structure confirm it.
#EURUSD 🇪🇺🇺🇸 - (Chart Link) The #EURUSD rally is done for now, but the bigger trend isn't. A pullback into the Fib 50.0–61.8 zone would be normal. This is where we expect buyers to step back in.
#XAUUSD - (Chart Link) Yesterday's setup was invalidated. That's exactly why we publish invalidation levels. The level was there before the move, not after it. When price broke it, the count was closed. No arguing with the chart, no holding on to an idea that stopped working. The bigger picture has not changed. Gold stays bullish while 4,203 holds. Below that, we switch to the second scenario, and we already have …
#XAUUSD - (Chart Link) Fib 38.2. A perfect touch! 👌 → Now wait for the breakout, the reaction alone is not confirmation.
#EURUSD 🇪🇺🇺🇸 - (Chart Link) Elliott Wave has three rules you can't break. One of them says wave four must stay out of wave one's territory. That's the line in the sand on EURUSD right now. A break above the red trend line would open the way for the trend to continue higher.
#XAUUSD - (Chart Link) Yesterday we said gold is in a wave 4 correction. Looking closer, the inner structure is made of three-wave moves. That means wave 4 can form as a WXY, or as an ABCDE triangle. If price drops below 4,605.11, we follow the green arrow. If it holds, we follow the blue one and watch for the triangle break.
#XAUUSD - (Chart Link) Gold's 2nd wave was quite deep, so the 4th wave may stay more shallow. For now, this looks more like a short pause than a major correction. The upward trend will then continue.
#DXY 🇺🇸 - (Chart Link) The dollar will continue to lose value; although we may see a rise in the coming days, this will not go beyond a correction and the dollar will continue to fall. Consequently, the major currency pairs will generally move in line with this trend.
👆🏻
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @ewstrategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Çetin Çalışkan |
|---|---|
| Description | Elliott Wave analyst and founder of Elliott Wave Strategy (EWS) |
| X / Twitter | @ewstrategy |
| Official site | https://www.ew-strategy.com |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elliott Wave Strategy” (@ewstrategy), 61,066 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ewstrategy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.