Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TMA OFFICIAL®

Channel

TMA OFFICIAL®

@TMAbyArty

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,141subscribers

-516 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001573829148
TypeChannel
Username@TMAbyArty
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TMAbyArty

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,14125,65725,3997 August 2026 — 25,657 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,649 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,636 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,618 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,603 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,594 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,588 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,567 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,546 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,520 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,506 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,503 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,500 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,483 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,467 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,442 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,417 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,400 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,384 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,364 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,351 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,339 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,324 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,307 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,284 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,271 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,252 subscribers8 September 2026 — 25,206 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,184 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,167 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,141 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 39 days, net -516. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,064–25,734 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 00:3825,141-26
13 Sept 2026, 08:4025,167-17
11 Sept 2026, 08:4125,184-22
8 Sept 2026, 15:0125,206-46
5 Sept 2026, 07:3925,252-19
3 Sept 2026, 13:5725,271-13
2 Sept 2026, 05:3525,284-23
1 Sept 2026, 02:1525,307-17
30 Aug 2026, 23:1325,324-15
30 Aug 2026, 00:2525,339-12
28 Aug 2026, 23:0325,351-13
27 Aug 2026, 21:1325,364-20
26 Aug 2026, 21:5525,384-16
25 Aug 2026, 23:4425,400-17
25 Aug 2026, 02:1425,417-25
23 Aug 2026, 13:4225,442-25
21 Aug 2026, 22:0525,467-16
20 Aug 2026, 20:5425,483-17
19 Aug 2026, 17:2425,500-3
18 Aug 2026, 19:1525,503first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.00%
avg views ÷ 25,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.775%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held46 (23 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total34,187
Reactions total259
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

886 reactions across 40 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43048.5%
👍20222.8%
🔥17720.0%
👏616.88%
🤔50.564%
🥰50.564%
😱40.451%
😁20.226%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 886 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,370 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

This Trading Strategy Loses 88% of the Time https://youtu.be/BbqrJynVvww

👍54

30 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,640 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026

I Gave AI My Trading Data… It Found This https://youtu.be/D_j2LeQ5Duw

👍104

29 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,830 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

You need this video if ur strat isn’t giving you the results you want

🔥5

29 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,790 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

You’re Backtesting Trading Strategies WRONG https://youtu.be/xn5TCIEtN6E

9🔥4

26 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈2,250 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

8🔥5

26 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,110 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://youtu.be/79npBG_7Nn0?is=iooPStG009gT34NO

🔥84

26 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC≈2,130 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026

my eyes burn and my back hurts from sitting for so many hours

👍10👏1

26 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC≈2,120 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026

this one was so f..king hard to do!!!

🔥10👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @TMAbyArty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTCAnonymous Poll415 voters

If you have more then $10,000 to commit to a trading account would be interested in a 1 on 1 call with me to get set up on the new automation?

  1. Yes it would be beneficial to have a walk through.36%
  2. No I can set it up my self9%
  3. No I don’t have more then $10,00059%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Swingtradinglab
@alexsetandforget · 213,316
#1
Trade with Pat 🆓 (FRN)
@tradewithpatfree · 77,473
#2
The Real Rayner Teo
@tradingwithrayner · 76,079
#3
GOLD Snipers
@goldsnipers11 · 194,685
#4
TradeLikeMalika
@Tradelikemalikagroup · 113,971
#5
Forex Salary Connect
@ForexSalaryConnect · 5,815
#6
Easy Forex 👑 OFFICIAL CHANNEL
@EasyForexPips · 243,677
#7
Trading Nut LIVE
@CamTradesAsia · 1,401
#8
FundedNext Official Channel
@FundedNextOfficialCommunity · 61,429
#9
DataDollar$
@datadollarswithme · 6,049
#10
Liquidity Trading
@Liquidity_Trading · 48,562
#11
Power of Trading
@poweroftradingofficial1 · 7,175
#12
Forex Ideas
@forexideaas · 3,260
#13
FXStreet Forex News
@fxstreetforex · 103,794
#14
Booming Bulls Academy
@boomingbullscompany · 338,221
#15
Market Makers
@mmsignalsfx · 105,341
#16
TRADING LEGEND F&O
@legend_of_trading · 160,851
#17
ApexBull.com
@ApexTrade · 4,645
#18
Elliott Wave Count
@elliottwavecount · 199,032
#19
Trader Theory
@tradertheory · 31,662
#20
VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals)
@VasilyTrading · 42,632
#21
MSB FX Elite Insights 🔥
@msbfxelite · 23,376
#22
Saint Patrick Fx
@STPATRICKF · 5,755
#23
Strive Scalper Official ©
@StriveScalperOfficial · 9,728
#24
CEO Trades
@ceotrades23 · 3,040
#25
Mindfully Trading FX Analysis
@emilymindfullytrading · 1,807
#26
FOREX TRADING WIZARD
@fxtradingwizard · 4,592
#27
theSignalyst
@thesignalyst · 10,190
#28
TRADiNG hub ™
@tradinghubreal · 37,282
#29
FirePips Forex Academy (Jeffforex)
@firepipsignals · 237,494
#30
We Pass Challenges
@wepassfunded · 10,851
#31
Darius FX
@Darius_FX · 3,446
#32
FoundXations | Results room
@elliotstrading · 12,990
#33
The AlphaFX Public Channel
@thealphafx · 5,138
#34
FxDave
@FxDdot · 919
#35
Trade with Ash ♌️︎
@Ash_TheTrader · 16,394
#36
JeaFx
@therealjeafx · 28,719
#37
KOJOFOREX
@kojoforextrades · 290,958
#38
ETM Free Channel
@escapethematrixfx · 3,002
#39
ForexLia
@forexlia · 9,696
#40
Stock Sniper Trading FX
@stocksnipertrading · 7,648
#41
Ankit Jain-Official
@ankitjainsofficial · 6,321
#42
Learn Price Action Trading
@learnpriceactiontrading · 10,546
#43
Forex & News Analysis
@fastplanetnews · 42,307
#44
Trader Zed
@traderzedict · 7,947
#45
MM Gold Trader🏆
@MMGoldTrader · 16,675
#46
Ace Trades
@AceTrades_Official · 119,841
#47
Yokesh Trader
@Professionalelliottwavetheory · 7,140
#48
Ben, Gold Trader
@bengoldtrader · 354,238
#49
Octa Analytics
@octa_analytics · 75,765
#50
Forex News | Fundamental
@Forex_LiveStream · 103,192
#51
A1 TRADING | Indices, Commodities, Forex, Futures
@A1TradingFXAnalysis · 44,052
#52
Sangam Agarwal FX
@SangamAgarwalFX · 8,014
#53
FX MENTOR US OFFICIAL fxmentorus.com
@fxmentor1985 · 3,141
#54
OTS Fx
@FORKETTAA2 · 5,535
#55
School Of Trades
@schooloftrades · 153,716
#56
Traders Paradise Live
@tradersparadise · 249,282
#57
R. Linda Trading
@RLindaTrade · 27,062
#58
Supply and Demand Snipper
@supply_demandez · 14,332
#59
RoyalPrince.org
@RoyalPrinceTrading · 2,143
#60
Forex.Doc by San Shone
@forexdochtc2 · 34,897
#61
Scalp Trading Lab
@scalptradingLabb · 20,648
#62
Kristina Forex Signals
@kristinaforexsignals · 5,867
#63
The Funded Trader
@thefundedtraderprogram · 14,034
#64
TradersAdda360 (Official)
@TradersAdda360officials · 11,210
#65
RebelsFunding
@rebelsfunding · 1,894 (as read 14 September 2026)
#66
GoldViewFX
@GoldView_FX · 13,809
#67
Elliott Wave Strategy
@ewstrategy · 61,057
#68
MQL5 Algo Trading
@mql5dev · 554,973
#69
Trading with Akash
@tradewithakashgarg · 31,201
#70
AwaisFX ⚡️
@itsawaisfx · 2,130
#71
Gold Trader Sunny 🏆
@goldtradersunny · 114,032
#72
Little Panda Forex
@LittlePandaForex · 32,257
#73
US30 PRO SIGNAL
@joinsigb · 2,379
#74
Forex Signals - Blue Pips
@Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips · 71,297
#75
Photon Trading
@photontrading · 33,604
#76
DRX GOLD
@wwdrxtrader0001 · 13,367
#77
Liquidity Sniper
@Liquidity_Sniper · 10,537
#78
Prop Fun - Signals & Results
@propfunofficial · 3,370
#79
Elite Traders Circle 🚀
@elitetraderscircle · 1,295
#80
Gold Trading XAUUSD
@xauusdanalysistrading · 6,165
#81
Trade Simple - @Idris.Tabrizi.IG
@Trade_Simple_FX · 8,201
#82
FBS Analytics
@fbsanalytics · 86,890
#83
Learn Candlesticks pattern Admin
@learn_candlesticks_patterns · 17,706
#84
NAS100 PRO SIGNALS💰💰
@Nas100freepip · 41,206
#85
PumpFun 100X Finder
@PumpFun100XFinder · 12,357
#86

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Real Rayner Teo
@tradingwithrayner · 76,079
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Trade with Pat 🆓 (FRN)
@tradewithpatfree · 77,473
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
Udupa Finance
@udupafinance · 26,840
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
Prep 1 | Science | Mr.Ahmed ElBasha
@Elbashasci · 24,948
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TMA OFFICIAL®” (@TMAbyArty), 25,141 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TMAbyArty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.