🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day ATR indicates the direction of an asset's trend.
- True39%
- False61%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6

Channel
@A1TradingFXAnalysis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,910subscribers
+406 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001228490587 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @A1TradingFXAnalysis |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/A1TradingFXAnalysis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 43,910 | +31 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 43,879 | +58 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 43,821 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 43,820 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 43,835 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 43,846 | +20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 43,826 | +14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 43,812 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 43,797 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 43,804 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 43,801 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 43,811 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 43,828 | -23 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 43,851 | +10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 43,841 | +31 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 43,810 | +14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 43,796 | +9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 43,787 | +15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 43,772 | +48 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 43,724 | first reading |
131 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 131 (30 July 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 326,780 |
| Reactions total | 2,715 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3,413 reactions across 130 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,129 | 62.4% | |
| 👍 | 667 | 19.5% | |
| 🔥 | 407 | 11.9% | |
| 😁 | 73 | 2.14% | |
| 🫡 | 60 | 1.76% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 0.879% | |
| 👀 | 21 | 0.615% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 0.322% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.176% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.117% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.088% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.059% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,413 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day ATR indicates the direction of an asset's trend.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day A bull trap occurs when:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤20
AUDUSD long signal ripping 📈
❤24
Want to trade like the institutions? Here's exactly what they're buying & selling... Stop guessing where the market is going and start following smart money. Get access to our live COT (Commitment of Traders) reports to see exactly where the big players are positioning their capital. ⌛️NEW DATA RELEASED TODAY at 3:30 PM EST! 🔓UNLOCK HERE
😁4❤2
AUD/USD Daily Chart Aussie has been chugging higher for some time now, but I'm especially liking how relatively strong it was during USD's pop this morning. I'm looking at opening some exposure in Aussie. Whether it be AUD/USD or starting a long campaign across multiple trades with the Aussie basket. If you want updates / alerts of new trades being taken, join our VIP group here! Today is the last day for 40% off.…
👍17❤6
DXY Fails to Hold a Stellar Jobs Report Pop The dollar popped this morning off a stellar jobs number, 162k versus 56k expected. Oddly enough, it was not enough for the dollar to follow through. Why? My speculation is the market is now eyeing inflation more than ever. Reflect back a couple weeks: Warsh was very hawkish at Jackson Hole, saying inflation was running too hot. Then yesterday Waller, another hawk, said h…
❤10🔥6👍4
Macro summary for gold:
❤15😁4
Gold daily chart: NFP was a big beat, which temporarily spiked the dollar. Gold bulls are holding up decently well though, rebounding intraday nicely. The recent 1-2 month uptrend still remains largely intact, and I think attention is now set squarely on next weeks inflation prints (CPI & PPI on Thursday and Friday) I remain long for now! If you want updates / alerts of new trades being taken, join our VIP group…
👍23👀3😎2
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day When the 50-day moving average crosses above the 200-day, this pattern is called:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥9💯4👏3
📌 Master Technical Analysis- Free Course! Price action tells a story—are you reading it correctly? 📉📈 Our FREE Technical Analysis Course walks you through the essential tools used by professional traders to time their entries and exits with confidence. Whether you're brand new or brushing up your skills, this course is packed with actionable insights. 🔥 What’s Inside? ✅ Support & Resistance: Spot high-probability t…
❤8👍2🔥2
Gold is absolutely ripping! 📈 Took me a few tries, but fortunately was able to catch the right entry 🙂 Congrats to any who are also riding this. All of my trades and updates are being shared in VIP here (40% off memberships ends tomorrow) - Nick
❤37🔥19🫡8
USDJPY Daily Chart I'm really liking this pullback. I've been waiting on it ever since we had Yen intervention chatter. There's two scenarios I see in the short-term: 1. Strong NFP + Oil remains bid = USD/JPY dip gets bought around 155.5 2. Weaker NFP = Fed likely stays neutral, in that case Yen strength continues to shine through and you see further dips. Nonetheless I'm looking to get active here despite what h…
❤18👍3😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @A1TradingFXAnalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 28 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day ATR indicates the direction of an asset's trend.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day A bull trap occurs when:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day When the 50-day moving average crosses above the 200-day, this pattern is called:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day The Point of Control (POC) on a volume profile represents the price level where the least amount of trading activity occurred during the session.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day A trader loses 25% of account equity. Why does this create a disproportionately larger challenge for recovery compared to the size of the original loss?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔔 Closing Bell - Question of the Day Using a fixed dollar risk amount per trade regardless of the asset's volatility results in consistent risk exposure across all positions.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A1 TRADING | Indices, Commodities, Forex, Futures” (@A1TradingFXAnalysis), 43,910 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/A1TradingFXAnalysis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.